130
submitted 11 hours ago by Garibaldee@lemm.ee to c/usa@midwest.social
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 25 points 7 hours ago

In 2016 NPR laid out a smear campaign on Bernie Sanders. Didn't even give the man equal time. Just smeared him. If it gets defunded I won't be totally sad.

[-] Blum0108@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

I literally stopped listening to NPR after the way they treated him.

[-] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 hours ago

Yea, same. Stopped donating. Stopped caring what they had to say. I'm glad there's some of us out there that saw it. It was such a wakeup call moment.

[-] Blum0108@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

It really tainted everything I listened to on the station.

[-] __nobodynowhere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

He's going to build them all houses to live in and give them all jobs. They'll never have to worry about unemployment again.

[-] psmgx@lemmy.world 24 points 8 hours ago

NPR stopped being credible when one of the Koch brothers bought his way into PBS and got on the board. Since then they've been "fair and balanced". Trump is just finishing the job.

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 33 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

With his small town, egalitarian rallies and appeals to “the forgotten man and woman,” he has revived the term populism in the political lexicon and gone further with it than anyone since Bryan’s heyday.

And this is how it happens. The moment Trump launches an investigation into PBS and NPR, they start kowtowing to his every demand and saying whatever he wants to hear in order to keep their funding.

[-] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago

Anti NPR propaganda? While the Trump administration is attacking NPR and public broadcasting in general? Sus

[-] MrQuallzin@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago

It's in response to NPR's recent article saying Trump works for the common man or something like that.

[-] Wolf314159@startrek.website 5 points 6 hours ago

Ron Elving wrote the article, it's his article published by NPR. That distinction matters because NPR is not some monolithic liberal mouthpiece, despite what zealots on either side might have you believe. Moreover, his opinion piece seems unique in offering any sliver lining to a Trump presidency. All of the other coverage I've heard on NPR about Trump, specifically not Republicans in general, has been resoundingly and consistently negative.

[-] HandBash@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

What positive coverage would there have been? Genuinely I ask

this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
130 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2206 readers
192 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS