1091
submitted 2 days ago by petsoi@discuss.tchncs.de to c/linux@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MunkysUnkEnz0@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Maybe we'll go back to forums.

I hope BBS's make a comeback. Pixilated titles and all..

[-] shortrounddev@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I've been working on writing my own forum in C# lately. Meant to look like some places I went on back in 2009-ish

[-] ora 1 points 18 hours ago

I mean, have you seen YetAnotherForum.net? .Net Core, PostgreSQL/MySQL Support and the old VBulletin styling from the hayday of internet forums.

[-] d_k_bo@feddit.org 19 points 1 day ago

Fuck X.com, all my homies use wayland.social

[-] jim3692@discuss.online 3 points 1 day ago

It's not loading for me. Is that instance up?

[-] d_k_bo@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Oh, that's sad. See https://mastodon.social/@compositor@wayland.social for some of their posts.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 day ago

If you ask me, this looks like a big possibility, as X/Twitter's evident bias towards the newly established U.S. government and their favoring of one demographic over the other could have set off Debian's move.

That's just me speculating, though. 🙃

No, you got it right. I get that you need to cover your ass to avoid a lawsuit, but it's exactly because a guy who loves the adoration of nazis owns the platform.

[-] VandimionDevilChild@beehaw.org 3 points 1 day ago

didn't even knew they had an account there, good can't see how twitter could ever be a good fit for Debian values or any person with who care about foss.

[-] rational_lib@lemmy.world 70 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

shutting out a significant portion of your community without seeking their input first isn't a sensible move for such a foundational open source project.

Ironic when X shuts out anyone who isn't logged in and shuts out anyone who doesn't pay for a blue checkmark from having visible replies.

Having an X account isn't consequence-free - if it becomes where updates occur, people have to sign up for an account and subject themselves to nazis everywhere and all manner of crypto spam just to see updates. And they have to pay Elon tribute to be heard in response. It's crazy that anyone sees it as being friendly to users.

[-] Ferk@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Were they using Twitter to provide exclusive updates not available anywhere else?

My impression from the post is that they are publishing the exact same updates in multiple locations, including mastodon at https://framapiaf.org/@debian ...so just because they were publishing in that one extra site to make it accessible to a particular subset of people does not mean all other people were being shut off from receiving updates.

However, I do agree with the move, but only because Debian being a FOSS initiative should stay away from proprietary platforms and promote FOSS.

[-] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 17 points 2 days ago

Agreed. Notably, Bluesky doesn't require an account to read posts.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 87 points 2 days ago

When it forces you to log in to view stuff, it's usefulness as a platform for announcements is substantially lessened.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I'd even say, the usefullness is fully gone.

[-] deathbird@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

The "safety" thing is a bit hyperbolic. I wish they'd just say "the quality of the interactions is going down" or "poor moderation" or something else a little more honest.

Twitter is a shitty platform in structure, format, and moderation. I'm glad Debian's not on it. But I am disappointed in them for using hyperbolic rhetoric.

[-] spoopy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Safe is a very broad term. Its not being used hyperbolically here. It's not referring to physical safety.

[-] deathbird@mander.xyz 1 points 22 hours ago

Yeah I'm aware that it means "emotional safey" the way they're using it. But they're still being hyperbolic, because emotional safety in the context of opinions on the Internet is just not meaningful. In a relationship one can speak of emotional safety in context of emotional manipulation or violence, but on a microblogging platform? The axiom of Tyler the Creator still applies, and we're not even talking about targeted harassment.

[-] topherclay@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

What is "The Axiom of Tyler the Creator"?

[-] Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 96 points 2 days ago

Good riddance. Stop using Nazi platforms and join the fediverse instead.

[-] nullpotential@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 2 days ago

shutting out a significant portion of your community without seeking their input first isn't a sensible move for such a foundational open source project.

It actually is a perfectly sensible move, and it doesn't "shut out" anyone. If anything, prioritizing twitter is what shuts users out. They linked to two-three alternatives. What's the argument here, exactly, from the other side?

[-] Ferk@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think the argument is that those alternatives already existed before. Twitter was not being prioritized, it was essentially mirroring the content already available in RSS, mastodon, etc. So effectively, there's now one less place where the news will be visible.

However, I do agree with the move, but only because Debian being a FOSS initiative should stay away from proprietary platforms and promote FOSS, even if it means effectively "shutting off" a portion of users who don't wanna leave the twitter bubble.

[-] savvywolf@pawb.social 211 points 2 days ago

Personally, I think that the discussion around this will evolve as the news spreads, but I agree with Robert on this one. Sure, X/Twitter has become a less welcoming place than before, but shutting out a significant portion of your community without seeking their input first isn't a sensible move for such a foundational open source project.

Nah, I think I'm cool if Debian doesn't respect the input of Nazi sympathisers.

[-] patatahooligan@lemmy.world 78 points 2 days ago

Yeah, that section is bad.

For one, it's has classic vibe "if you want to keep the nazis out, you're the one who's exclusionary".

But also, how is refusing to engage on a platform "shutting out a significant portion of [the] community"? That sounds backwards to me. Blocking people from engaging with Debian on its own platforms would be shutting them out. The implication in the article is that Debian is obligated to be unconditionally present on every social platform its users might be on.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 49 points 2 days ago

The other twist is, unlike Xitter, you don't have to create an account on Mastodon to be able to read their feed. You can access it like any other website. So nobody is getting shut out. They're just posting elsewhere, where anyone can read it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] markstos@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago

My town’s subreddit just started a policy to disallow links to X for similar reasons.

There is a movement to avoid the platform.

How does one not feel safe on a digital platform? Even if someone physically threatens you, nothing is going to happen to you. And you can block/mute people you don't care for.

Digital platforms have promoted genocide. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa16/5933/2022/en/ Blocking people you don't care for would have no impact here.

[-] deathbird@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Leaving the platform would have no impact either. You are talking about something different.

[-] DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works 90 points 2 days ago

Wild that so many are still hanging out at the Nazi bar

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 173 points 2 days ago
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Slikki 4 points 1 day ago

Ship ship ship!

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 60 points 2 days ago

I didn't really need another reason to love Debian more but here we are... I'm donating to Debian today

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zacryon@feddit.org 34 points 2 days ago

The reasons (summarized using Copilot):

  • The platform no longer aligns with Debian's values, social contract, code of conduct, and diversity statement.
  • Concerns over X becoming a place where people they care about don't feel safe.
  • Abuse on the platform happening without consequences.
  • Issues with misinformation and lack of moderation.
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] mormund@feddit.org 112 points 2 days ago

They can be found on Mastodon here: @debian@framapiaf.org

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] usernameusername@lemm.ee 32 points 2 days ago

god, the replies to their tweet are awful...

[-] FFF982@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 days ago

Why politicize everything?

Simps for X (formerly twitter)

[-] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Those replies are why they are leaving. And good riddance to such a godawful platform.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] SVcross@lemmy.world 65 points 2 days ago

I don't mind, actually everyone should ditch Twatter.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
1091 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

49446 readers
1035 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS