404
submitted 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) by UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

Almost all the links in my front homepage are sponsored now. What's next, a few ads in the bookmark bar? How about when I enter a URL, I then have to type "McDonald's" before I can actually navigate there?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] carrylex@lemmy.world 3 points 48 minutes ago

There are some more privacy friendly forks of "Firefox for Android", which have sponsored shortcuts disabled or minimized by default. For example:

Feel free to give them a try :)

[-] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 2 points 25 minutes ago

+1 for fennec

[-] plwt@mstdn.social 1 points 33 minutes ago

@UltraGiGaGigantic Sorry about that, not quite what is expected to happen. I understand that it has been looked into and has now been resolved.

#fxhelp

[-] Redex68@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago

Personaly those shortcuts are a feature I literally never use so much so I don't even register their existence anymore.

[-] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 38 points 6 hours ago

The browser itself is free, and they have to make money somehow to keep the company running (if the CEO didn't keep most of it for themself). If you don't like it, you can turn it off or download an ad-free fork.

[-] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Name an internet browser that costs money

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 20 minutes ago

How much money are they likely to make over a lifetime of a user from the sponsorships. Would FirefoxPro actually be a good idea?

[-] nonmi9@programming.dev 18 points 4 hours ago

Name an internet browser that's not rigged to show you adds, or one that doesn't havest your data.

[-] TotalCourage007@lemm.ee 5 points 4 hours ago

Y'all can use LibreWolf or BestHomePageEver if it really bugs somebody. I do get being annoyed by shortcut ads though.

[-] NudeNewt@lemm.ee 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I wouldn't recommend LibreWolf to the average user as they'll unfoubtedly stretch their attack surface thin.

[-] itslilith 2 points 4 hours ago

It's not gonna make them more exposed than vanilla Firefox

[-] NudeNewt@lemm.ee 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Absolutely, it's just the browser extensions most end-users want/need that would cause them distress in that regard. It's simply not as user friendly from what I can recall, it's been a while since I last used it so it may have improved since then

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Microsoft Edge

[-] callyral@pawb.social 23 points 5 hours ago
[-] skizzles@lemmy.world 27 points 4 hours ago

Yup, you can turn it off.

It's not overly difficult to get to the setting either.

[-] ghen@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 hours ago

There's literally a settings button on that new tab page to take you right to the correct setting.

[-] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 5 hours ago

If we want software to be FOSS we have to stop bitching so much about developers trying to make the math work.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

One could posit an ideal public sector development studio that takes grants from the state/federal government to produce useful Open Source software. Think public radio or public broadcasting, but for apps.

Hell, it isn't even wild in the current moment. Modern day AWS and Azure subsidize much of its small/new user client base with the massive public sector clientele. OpenAI and DeepSeek are both the product of giant state-sponsored initiatives to develop AI that is free at point of service. Plenty of the original internet architecture was the product of public investment and grants, as was the university-centric ARPNET that would eventually be commoditizated into the commercial World Wide Web.

Look up the history of the National Center for Supercomputing Applications and the pioneering of Mosaic, the first widely available GUI-based web browser. It was the foundation for both Internet Explorer and Netscape Navigator, which licensed the original design for the tiniest fraction of what it would ultimately generate in future revenues.

[-] Aeri@lemmy.world 27 points 7 hours ago

Yeah but you can literally just turn this off with no fuss.

1.Firefox for Android.

2.Tap the menu button.

3.Tap. Settings.

4.Tap Homepage.

5.Deselect Sponsored shortcuts under Shortcuts.

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 25 points 7 hours ago

This was a bug

And looks like it's been fixed :)

[-] a9cx34udP4ZZ0@lemmy.world 17 points 8 hours ago

So how exactly were you planning on them making money if they don’t take money from Google to be the default search engine and they don’t take money to place advertisements on the default home page?

[-] themusicman@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Open source projects shouldn't have "making money" on their priority list. I would donate to Mozilla if I had some guarantee that my money would actually fund Firefox development

[-] P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 4 hours ago

But why does (some) people want every software to be open source if making money can't be an objective? /genq

[-] themusicman@lemmy.world 1 points 56 minutes ago

I'm not one of those people, and to be clear I support for-profit companies open sourcing code. Mozilla is a unique case where donations are a tiny fraction of their income and Firefox development is a tiny fraction of their expenses. I just want to donate directly to the parts I care about (Firefox, MDN).

[-] Old_Yharnam@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Breaking news: Businesses need to make money, more at 11

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 69 points 12 hours ago
[-] potustheplant@feddit.nl 7 points 11 hours ago

Also, I rarely use Firefox on my phone and my links are still all from websites I've visited.

[-] krolden@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 hours ago

The best thing about this is that you can turn it off

[-] MangoPenguin 6 points 7 hours ago

Seems fine to me, they need to make money somehow.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 hours ago

This is why I torrent firefox pro using Limewire.

[-] zante@slrpnk.net 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

someone on lemmy has a bit of a hateboner for mozilla.

[-] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Almost all the links in my front homepage are sponsored now. What’s next, a few ads in the bookmark bar? How about when I enter a URL, I then have to type “McDonald’s” before I can actually navigate there?

Don't give them new ideas, Sony might jump in and patent that too.

[-] greedytacothief@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago

Honestly, I don't care. I don't even look at that stuff, I just type in the bar thing what I want. Mozilla has to fund the project somehow.

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 11 points 12 hours ago

Ads are one thing, but this seems excessive and probably unintentional. Looks like someone just filed this bug, which is another sign that it might be an unintentional problem: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1944704

[-] mvirts@lemmy.world 46 points 16 hours ago

Better than the unlabeled sponsorship behind the default search engine.

[-] lemmylurkaround@lemmy.world 83 points 19 hours ago

See ads, "how dare they" Sees paid version, "how dare they" Development costs time and money, pick your poison.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
404 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

18311 readers
1053 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS