596
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 week ago

This meme is almost a decade old now isn't it?

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

Still one of my favorites

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

It first appeared shortly after he was elected. It needs to be updated to the person burning their house down.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

Lol. So many dumb voters who think everything changes for the better overnight if they protest vote and don't grasp that politics is a battle of voting for the less shitty option so you can take baby steps toward something better.

In the end, all they did was set us back X number of years/decades. Thanks stupids.

[-] Carl@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago

politics is a battle of voting for the less shitty option so you can take baby steps toward something better.

Every single time Dems have won since Carter, we have been baby stepping towards something worse. The victories for gay rights under Obama were a brief outlier in our country's otherwise uninterrupted march towards fascism.

ah yes, unfortunately the alternative to literally hitler, was moderately worse than what i preferred, and therefore, literally worse than hitler, even though hitler literally genocided the jews.

[-] Carl@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

your misuse of the word literally in this post figuratively gave me an aneurysm.

I'm on the couch, literally reading this comment laterally.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Turret3857@infosec.pub 9 points 1 week ago

Looks to be on track to setting us back about 90 years and moving us about halfway around the globe.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I'm thinking 150 years, and staying right here....

[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Since the Democrats didn't give every single thing on the bLuEmAGa screechers wishlist, ofc Trump was the perfect alternative!

Definitely not an example of letting perfection become the enemy of good or anything!

Edit: To whoever replied to me, but probably has me blocked since I can't see it (only the reply counter) unblock me if you're going to reply to me, coward!

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago

Uh, that means you blocked them.

[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Thanks, I never block anybody but sure enough pancakes was on it lol

[-] toomanypancakes@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Letting perfection become the enemy of good? Good is funding a genocide?

Also, I've never blocked anyone.

[-] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago

Now we’re funding a genocide and making life worse for everyone else. Huzzah!

[-] toomanypancakes@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Yup, it's pretty outstanding. We're a nation of gullible, hateful idiots it seems.

[-] SuperNovaStar 3 points 1 week ago

Now we're upping the funding for said genocide and actively cheering it on.

[-] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

We protected the Palestinian children by letting a worse candidate win! Yay!

[-] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

One of Biden's last acts this month was to approve another few billion for Israel, and Harris said repeatedly she wasn't gonna do anything different from Biden's admin. It wasn't gonna be better for those kids if she won.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

My b, you somehow got blocked on accident as I also never block anybody.

Anyways

Good is funding a genocide?

There was keeping the status quo at worse (Harris) and then there was throwing the dial to 11 and opening new potential genocide fronts right here in America! (Trump)

[-] toomanypancakes@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Oh no worries, I probably said something stupid at some point.

I completely agree with everything you're saying except that the Harris campaign was good. There were no good choices this election, there was just an objectively wrong one. I voted for Harris anyway because trump is obviously worse by far, I think I'm just still pissed at her milquetoast center right campaign.

[-] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 12 points 1 week ago

As a fellow reluctant Harris voter, I wonder if people like them think that anyone who criticized Harris/the campaign didn't vote. I know A LOT of hardcore leftists that are left of even me and every one of them voted. Some would maybe not say it out loud in a group, but they all did just in case Trump had the votes lol. It's a shame they sacrificed their morals not only for Harris to lose, but now they're also being blamed for it. If people had anti lib energy the way they had anti leftist energy, we'd have M4A by now lol.

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

Fine, letting perfection be the enemy of not the worst, then.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Protest voters did not impact the results

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So… Harris lost by some 2.3 million votes. Collectively, third party spoilers netted over 3 million votes.

Now, we add in the just under 90 million people that chose not to vote at all- and assume that at least several million of those people folded their arms and pouted because something they don’t understand is going on in a place they didn’t know existed a bit over year ago because of reasons that even though has been explained to them ad-nauseam, they still refuse to acknowledge because if flies in the face of their edgy manufactured outrage…

… it’s safe to assume protest votes and non-voting was a tremendous lift in helping trump win the White House.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

I know for sure some people who didn't vote because of white "leftist" content creators who were working hard all 2024 to smear Kamala and BIPOC liberal content creators. There's not enough data to measure the damage they did, I don't see any reason they should be let off the hook either.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago
  1. Those idiots didn't know going into the election that their vote wouldn't affect the outcome, but they did it anyway.

  2. Protest voters could conceivably include people who protested by not voting, and they most certainly affected the outcome.

[-] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Protest voters were young people, who voted the exact same as every other election. They don't vote.

If you want to engage with reality and look at the data you would see that the groups that voted for Biden and not Harris were older white men/women, and older hispanic men. Most likely because of the instilled patriarchal values and machismo culture of these groups made it hard to stomach voting for a woman with the same policies as the white man they voted for.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 week ago

Biden's polling low, the voters want things do be different... huh, better campaign on doing nothing different! What? They're saying we're doing a genocide? Well, better point out that Trump is gonna do a worse genocide!

That'll be a great message, exactly the sort of thing that makes people excited to vote...

[-] peregrin5@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago

"Democrats didn't entertain me enough so I didn't vote."

[-] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

OP mentions genocide

Response frames it as entertainment

[-] Lesrid@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Yes. The party needs to be enticing. They lost an election. Shaming voters for not embracing lesser evilism is another mistake the party is making and you're reproducing here.

At least twice now the party has believed themselves to be assured of victory because Trump is on the ballot. Now they may never have a chance to run again.

[-] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago

Yeah, because people should vote on excitement and engagement, not truth ... totally doesn't devolve a democratic process into one of reactionary populisms fueled by false promises. If people want to get excited, they should go to a theme park. If they have a shred of civil responsibility, they vote, specially when things were as bad as they were.

[-] Carl@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

If people want to get excited, they should go to a theme park.

Welcome to America!

If they have a shred of civil responsibility

lmao

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

because people should vote on excitement and engagement, not truth

What part of the genocide wasn't true at the time of the elections?

reactionary populisms fueled by false promises

Like codifying Roe V Wade? Like closing Guantanamo?

If they have a shred of civil responsibility

Civil responsibility is voting for the party that pretends to care about Gazans while carrying out a genocide and funding Israel.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

because people should vote on excitement and engagement, not truth

What part of the genocide wasn't true at the time of the elections?

reactionary populisms fueled by false promises

Like codifying Roe V Wade? Like closing Guantanamo?

If they have a shred of civil responsibility

Civil responsibility is voting for the party that pretends to care about Gazans while carrying out a genocide and funding Israel.

load more comments (1 replies)

i mean, it's also factually true. I still maintain that the dems ran a fairly good campaign. The problem was voter turnout, as it always is, except for 2020, when voting was easier.

Because democrats have an aversion to actually doing things for some reason (primarily age related)

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

At which tax bracket do you get to enjoy life now?

[-] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

If I remember right, things start to turn around somewhere north of 350k yearly.

[-] Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Oh neat. I'm only 320k away.....

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

Only one color on that map wanted things to be "different."

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
596 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5994 readers
2868 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS