430
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

Donald Trump signed an executive order declaring only two sexes, male and female, based on reproductive cells at conception, banning gender-affirming care, and limiting federal recognition of gender diversity.

Experts, including Dr. Richard Bribiescas, president of the Human Biology Association, criticized the policy as nonsensical, stating, “Clearly, this order is not fully informed by current biological science.”

Biologists noted the order oversimplifies human biology, ignores intersex individuals, and conflates sex and gender.

Critics warned it advances anti-trans rhetoric and risks legal challenges.

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cybersin@lemm.ee 89 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Ah, yes.

Trump will surely change his mind after reading their sternly written letter, because as we all know, Trump truly cares about science.

[-] atx_aquarian@lemmy.world 29 points 6 days ago

Changing his mind isn't the goal. He constantly already does that for the highest bidder. The people who have to enforce this stuff and the courts that have to rule on it are the ones who need to be well aware of its nonsense, and the bigger of a mess that causes, the better.

[-] fed0sine@lemm.ee 7 points 6 days ago

He totally reads written reports too.

[-] mjhelto@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago

And he can't read, at least not big words with more than 2 syllables.

[-] lunarul@lemmy.world 45 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

conflates sex and gender

I read the order. It explicitly avoids defining gender and says that only sex should be used everywhere (which it does define, but incorrectly).

It basically says that the government doesn't care about your gender, they just want to know what's in your pants (or used to be).

[-] TheFogan@programming.dev 59 points 6 days ago

they just want to know what’s in your pants (or used to be).

At the moment of conception....

Of course that's the real poison pill of this. The real intention is to declare personhood at conception... and pave the way for the nation wide abortion ban. Making things worse for trans people, is just the decoy.

[-] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 25 points 6 days ago

At the moment of conception...

Doesn’t everyone start out female and then become male or stay female?

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 30 points 6 days ago

Conception is literally the point when the sperm fertilizes the egg:

Conception (or fertilization) is when sperm and an egg join together.

reference

At that point it's not anything, it's just a fertilized egg. Assigning a sex to it makes no sense at all.

[-] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 6 points 6 days ago

So everyone should be no sex then?

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 17 points 6 days ago

At conception, yes, there is no sexual differentiation. In humans the SRY protein is responsible for a fetus developing male sexual characteristics. The effects of this gene are expressed after week 6 of development:

SRY gene effects normally take place 6–8 weeks after fetus formation which inhibits the female anatomical structural growth in males. It also works towards developing the secondary sexual characteristics of males.

That is, at least a month and a half after conception.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

If they declare personhood at conception some pregnant women should demand to be allowed to purchase a life insurance policy, and immediately sue when denied.

[-] TheFogan@programming.dev 7 points 5 days ago

The levels of chaos that can come from this are off the charts... Yeah someone can purchase life insurance on an unborn child... at the same time every miscarriage is on the board for manslaughter/homicide, basically leading mothers to prove that the miscariages were not intended or negligent. The ramifications and definitions of things are outright terrifying.

[-] Zero22xx 7 points 4 days ago

Critics warned it advances anti-trans rhetoric

Hmmm yes this floor appears to made of floor.

[-] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago

Imagine; all of this to prevent trans folks from using the women’s restroom… but now we can all use the women’s restroom by way of Executive Order. What a time to be alive!

[-] elrik@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

I'm pretty sure now we all MUST use the women's restroom as we're all legally female.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 17 points 5 days ago

I thought he declared one sex?

[-] LadyMeow 24 points 6 days ago

Executive order ‘ripped’, or maybe ‘blasted’ or whatever the latest word for ‘we made some tiny lil vid or headline saying maybe it wasn’t the best.’ I’m so sick of it. Sick of the way media portrays things. That’s it, the media has been SLAMMED by me, ripped, blasted, smoked! Whatever bullshit that basically means ‘we disagree, but have no teeth’ bleh

[-] prole 2 points 4 days ago

Right? Add to that, that the reasoning they always use is reasoning that no longer applies.

Stop wasting time with open letters, and arguing about the wording of laws and orders whose intents are crystal clear, and will be carried out in the way it was always intended regardless of any stupid fucking technicality you think you found.

[-] Grail@aussie.zone 15 points 5 days ago

Trump's new sex definitions are impossible for anyone to meet. Everyone is legally nonbinary now. https://medium.com/@viridiangrail/trump-says-americans-are-all-intersex-not-female-b31f97ffd80d

[-] NautiNolana@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

I don’t necessarily support the law, but your take saying “everyone is legally nonbinary” is ridiculous. At conception, if you were able to remove and examine the genetic material in the cell, it would absolutely be apparent if it was XY or XX.

I love bashing Trump and his idiocy… but this is definitely not the way. It’s embarrassing for us liberals…

[-] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 30 points 5 days ago

You're talking about genotype. They define sex based on phenotype. It assumes that the genotype can only be binary (it can be X0, XXY, XYY etc). It also assumes that genotype equates with phenotype, which is also wrong given in utero hormonal exposures, testosterone insensitivity, etc.

The WH definition makes no sense for anybody familiar with biology beyond 10th grade level.

[-] NautiNolana@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Nope, I’m not. But thank you for your “contribution”.

[-] aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Your karyotype doesn't determine what kind of gamete you produce.

See for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Androgen_insensitivity_syndrome

AFAIK we don't have any way to determine this before sex differentiation actually occurs. When sex differentiation occurs it happens as a response to hormones, not karyotype. It's possible that environment could be the determining factor, as is the case with freemartins.

So no, it's not an exaggeration nor embarrassing to say that nobody meets the order's definition of male or female.

[-] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

The WH accidentally invented Schrödinger's Sex.

Of course it's also wrong because unlike dead/alive sex is a bimodally distributed continuum we binarize for simplicity. Also, don't look up the Schrödinger dude's sexual preferences because you'll puke. But that stays on brand too.

[-] NautiNolana@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Wow this place is no better than Reddit. You can be incredibly wrong and still get all of those upvotes! Amazing!

[-] Grail@aussie.zone 5 points 5 days ago

However, the law doesn't talk about genotype. It talks about gametes. Embryos don't produce gametes. The law does not specify a difference.

[-] NautiNolana@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

My point still stands but thank you for “contributing”.

[-] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Your point is taken poorly because you raise issue with people giving deservedly nonsensical interpretations to a nonsensical definition, while giving a pass on WH calling their definition an "incontrovertible biological truth".

[-] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

But they're not talking about its effect on egg prices

[-] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 1 points 3 days ago

Don't you understand? You were the egg this whole time.

[-] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Reminds me of the time someone wanted to define π = 3 because it would be more convenient to calcate with.

(Except bigotry isn't quite the same as convenience, except insofar that it conveniently avoids having to acknowledge complex social issues)

[-] Zier@fedia.io 11 points 5 days ago

As usual President Felon is talking out his ass, doing nothing for Americans, and being led by the nose by christian fascists. Someone please get that man 25 buckets of KFC. Cardiac event in 3-2...

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 5 points 5 days ago

So they just denied the Judeo-Christian yhwh, because that being is androgyne.

this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
430 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19594 readers
2453 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS