336
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 90 points 2 weeks ago
[-] TingoTenga@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago

Should be the other way around. It takes one year of profits to pay three week worth of fines.

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 2 weeks ago

Do they even actually pay these fines tho? I would assume there are just endless legal battles about them and none of them have actually ever been payed.

[-] programmer_belch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 weeks ago

It would be more illustrative to know the percentage of the annual profits the fine costed them

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 10 points 2 weeks ago

3 weeks is about 5% of the year. Do you think that’s a more illustrative figure than 3 weeks in a year? I think you’re in the minority on that opinion.

[-] puchaczyk 12 points 2 weeks ago

I would be more intrested in how long it takes them to pay a fine using the revenue from the region that fine was issued from.

[-] happy_wheels@lemm.ee 8 points 2 weeks ago

I probably haven't had enough coffee yet, but what exactly is this chart trying to show? And why are MS, Meta, and Apple listed multiple times as opposed to once like they are in the article (once per section)?

[-] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 12 points 2 weeks ago

It's an incredibly bad chart mostly for the x-axis being so horrible in scale that March, when a lot of fines were handed out, had to be repeated twice.

What we are seeing are specific fines that were handed out. Like the Apple $2B fine is from the EU for antitrust law violation that was handed to them in March. The $89M fine was handed out by the US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) in October over the whole Apple Card thing and how bank disputes weren't being handled and how Goldman Sachs who backed the card wasn't keeping all of the required compliance information (which I'm shocked at how quickly everyone forgot about it).

I digress.

Yeah, this chart is incredibly bad at indicating this information and by breaking out by violation over time really takes away from the point that ought to be expressed.

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yup, the x axis might as well not exist

A date on each bubble might have been better

[-] prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The article aggregated all the fines per company (though a breakdown is available at the bottom of the article). The image shows the top 8 biggest individual fines, and the companies you listed had multiple fines in the top 8.

[-] WanderingPhoenix@mander.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

It shows the biggest fines imposed to each company and the month they were paid in. At the end of the article there's a list with different individual fines of each company, with the ammount fined as well as the reason and a link to a relevant article. They just took the biggest numbers for this chart. Hope this helps, and correct me if I'm wrong :)

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

if we could get that to months and for all corps and it would be a decent tax rate.

[-] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Blade9732@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, but have you thought about the poor CEO's? These fines make it harder for Bezos to buy another yacht to take him to his yacht that tenders his main yacht.

[-] ShareMySims@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

These fines make it harder for Bezos

Truth is he doesn't even notice it. These fines are mere days, maybe a week's worth of income to people like him.

[-] isles@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Furthermore, the wealthy don't take cash profits to buy things, they collateralize their wealth for loans to buy yachts.

this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
336 points (100.0% liked)

Data is Beautiful

1451 readers
5 users here now

Be respectful

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS