185
submitted 3 weeks ago by chanteoma@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] zeca@lemmy.eco.br 68 points 3 weeks ago

i would guess that people that deactivate js are fine not using google for search

[-] Toribor@corndog.social 23 points 3 weeks ago

This breaks things like Whoogle that used the JavaScript-less api to pull search results.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

Any idea if it will break SearXNG?

[-] Wolfie@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago

True. I am one of those. I just use duckduckgo or swisscows or brave search.

[-] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago
[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 5 points 3 weeks ago

I wish they would fix the bug where I can't click "images" with js disabled

[-] far_university190@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

That no bug. There just no html search for image.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 2 weeks ago
[-] far_university190@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

No. Missing feature is not bug.

You not write bugreport, you write feature request.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 2 weeks ago

Image search already exists. Its just missing for some users. That's a bug, not a new feature request

[-] andreas@lemmy.kfed.org 22 points 3 weeks ago

SearXNG solves this (and many other problems)

[-] krnl386@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 weeks ago

Soon they’re gonna start using Widevine DRM to encrypt the Javascript required to access the search results. 🤦🏻‍♂️

[-] Tender@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 weeks ago

Motherf***ers

[-] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 weeks ago

Why it is important to use alternative metadata fetcher like searxng

[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 weeks ago

Someone here use still Google for searching? 😳

[-] hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 3 weeks ago

Luckily, as of today I can still set my user agent to something like a Playstation or ancient firefox/IE to get a lightweight HTML-based page. The results are in www.google.com/url?q= format but I can use a redirector extension for that.

[-] M33@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 3 weeks ago

Better abandon google search for something else at this point. Even if alternative search engine calls bing and google, at least they take this BS out of the way

[-] hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

you're right, but startpage is slower than lightweight google :p

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 8 points 3 weeks ago

I mean on the list of reasons not to use Google, I feel like this one is pretty low.

[-] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

This used to be a great feature for vintage computers. If the machine had internet, you could search with HTTP site instead of HTTPS.

The alternatives listed here might not require JS, but most if not all of them require SSL. Vintage computers struggle to support that. Anyway, Google is best avoided when possible so hopefully an alternative surfaces .

[-] Undertaker@feddit.org 6 points 3 weeks ago

Startpage.com does not

[-] zerozaku@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

What does this mean?

[-] mr_satan@monyet.cc 2 points 2 weeks ago

Wait this is new? I wasn't able to use google without JS for sometime.

this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
185 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

33460 readers
273 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS