I understand what you mean, but the number of Americans who care about Gaza for it to impact their vote wasn't clear. Everyone (including me, admittedly) thought the economy was the main reason Harris lost and everything else came after, so this is new information.

As you correctly point out, and according to the article:

Of course, diverging from Biden on Gaza risked losing voters who supported his policy. But a close look at the survey suggests that risk was low compared to the potential reward. Voters who were with Biden in 2020 and stuck with Harris in 2024 were asked if breaking with him on Gaza would make them more or less enthusiastic about voting for Harris. By a 35 to 5 margin, they said doing so would have made them more enthusiastic to vote for her, with the remainder saying it would have made no difference.

The real issue is Biden shouldn't have been materially supporting genocide in the first place

Then Harris wouldn't have needed to decide to break with his administration or not.

The whole situation was russian propaganda.

It's weird to blame foreign donors instead of Raytheon, Boeing, Lockheed, which donated 40 mill, and whose stock half of congress own.

Israel is the client state here.

Ah the zero sum game enjoyer has logged on, where everything is a zero sum game, if you had to vote between Hitler and Mussolini you would shed a single tear and proudly cast your ballot for Mussolini as he is clearly the less bad option and go to sleep soundly knowing your vote didn't benefit Hitler.

I doubt she will pay much of a price at all. I bet she will do fine the next four years.

I mean if this is to be believed he kinda did make it better. We can all hate on the orange man but it seems he kept his word here.

In what some Israeli media described as a “tense meeting”, Witkoff delivered his message. The president-elect was emphatic that he wanted a ceasefire-for-hostages deal. Trump wanted the war in Gaza finished. He had other fish to fry.