540
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FundMECFS@slrpnk.net 159 points 5 months ago

Kind of fucked up but tbf Google does similarly shady stuff.

Please just use duckduckgo (or SearX).

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago

DDG is just Bing under the hood

[-] FundMECFS@slrpnk.net 56 points 5 months ago

And Searx is the same. And startpage is just google.

But the point is they don’t track.

[-] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 12 points 5 months ago

DDG was letting Bing track users. They may have stopped now that they got in trouble for it.

[-] FundMECFS@slrpnk.net 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Wait really?

Best I could find was this arstechnica article from 2022:

Microsoft trackers run afoul of DuckDuckGo, get added to blocklist: Search privacy company still needs Bing, but won't allow Microsoft's trackers. https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/08/microsoft-trackers-run-afoul-of-duckduckgo-get-added-to-blocklist/

[-] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 8 points 5 months ago

Yeah that would be it:

Previously, we were limited in how we could apply our 3rd-Party Tracker Loading Protection on Microsoft tracking scripts due to a policy requirement related to our use of Bing as a source for our private search results

I couldn't remember the details exactly, but basically up until then they were allowing Microsoft tracking despite all their advertising claiming they wouldn't track users.

[-] dan@upvote.au 24 points 5 months ago

SearX is dead; you should use SearXNG now.

[-] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 17 points 5 months ago

I feel like Microsoft is way more shameless about their shady stuff. They've been messing around with impersonating google/chrome for awhile now, they recently had that thing where they would copy all your open chrome tabs, and then when you started your computer it would open edge with all your chrome tabs to trick people into using edge instead.

[-] vinyl@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

They aren't afraid of people complaining about them, they are afraid of the government, and they fulfill a hefty amount of contracts for the gov

[-] vinyl@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

I would use anything else before DDG, the primary function of it which is searching, generally feels sucky

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 77 points 5 months ago

Microsoft does so many scammy things when it comes to trying to prevent people from using Chrome/Google. Even though Edge/Bing hasn't caught on, I really think them abusing windows dominate OS position this way should be enough for an antitrust lawsuit.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

I'm having antitrust deja vu. Anybody else?

[-] Veneroso@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Hope for EU sanctions because it's going to be a rubber stamp for at least the next four years in the US.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 67 points 5 months ago

lol the gall

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 57 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Usual Microsoft, using shady tactics instead of creating a better product or just focusing on their own thing and respecting user choice. They should grow up sometime.

[-] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago

They seem to pathologically not be able to help themselves, even with products that don't need to be promoted that way. I used Outlook for Android for years because it was actually quite good. Had a multi account inbox view, true dark mode, Galaxy Watch compatibility when those were all rather unusual features. But then they started trying to put Bing search in my long press menu system wide, using Outlook as the Trojan horse to do so, and I just found that too obnoxious

[-] tibi@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

I don't think they can. They would need to rethink their company culture, but because the current one makes big numbers go up, they don't really have to change anything.

[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 38 points 5 months ago
[-] seven_phone@lemmy.world 38 points 5 months ago

This is a search engine showing open evidence of skewing results away from true for their own motivations. Slightly comic when it is Microsoft doing it to Google but if they do this so blatantly how else are they more subtly redirecting our searches towards biased or even false results that benefit them and misinform the user.

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 37 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This is a genius move to keep you from Google search

Seems more like a genius move to get slapped with another antitrust-like lawsuit.

[-] Feelfold@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago

Corps don't give a fuck about an antitrust law suit. In the US, the party that pays the most to jerk off CEOs just got put in charge. Even if it was the other party, who only pays slightly less, the most extreme fines are a slap on the wrist. Hell, come Jam 20th it'll probably a tax write off.

Until the EU levies fines that would kneecap these companies out of business, there is no incentive to change the behavior.

[-] sandwichsaregood@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I mean the original lawsuit was for aggressively bundling Internet Explorer and kneecapping other browsers. Which sure sounds a lot like a minor variation on what they've been doing with Edge and Bing for a while now, without consequences. Antitrust enforcement is not something I have a lot of confidence in for the foreseeable future.

[-] const_void@lemmy.ml 28 points 5 months ago

Bing/Microsoft are so scummy lately

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

The enemy of my enemy is still my enemy! But an enemy I like to watch.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BangCrash@lemmy.world 26 points 5 months ago

The single thing Google did right when they first came out was a clean UI with a search bar on an uncluttered page.

At the time the competitors had search pages cluttered with ads and news. It was so bad you couldn't think.

If Microsoft makes their search nice to look at them it's going to get many more users

[-] airportline@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 months ago

DuckDuckGo and Kagi managed to figure this out. Bing is the odd one out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lipilee@feddit.nl 23 points 5 months ago

Honestly, that's actually smart and nobody is hurt here. Google by now is as shit as Bing, so there's nothing wrong with using B instead of G. Let them downvotes come :)

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 37 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Misleading users is definitely harmful. Since this is obviously done on purpose, I'd say it's malicious.

[-] lipilee@feddit.nl 17 points 5 months ago

yeah, you're right, actually. if I have to fit this somewhere in my framework of things, it'd fall in the "dark pattern" box. so per definition it's actually malicious.

[-] lowleveldata@programming.dev 6 points 5 months ago

It's malicious and I like it. What's more entertaining than watching giants fight?

[-] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 5 points 5 months ago

Is Google really as shit as Bing? I had to Ask Jeeves to confirm that.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

With Net Neutrality gone, these giant tech companies could start bidding to make ISPs make their search engine default and have the other competitors fail to load.

[-] Pika@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The stupidest thing about this whole entire thing about net neutrality.

The entire reason the FCC was created was to prevent the committee from being governed by the government process to avoid corruption for the exact circumstances we're seeing here

Saying that the Supreme Court and the appeals court has any area of saying what the FCC is legally allowed to do is laughable, as the entire reason for the committee being isolated from the standard Executive Administrative branches was to prevent government overreach like they're doing currently.

This is 1,000% them saying hey you're an isolated committee that we can't touch but you're not allowed to do the one thing that your committee is supposed to do

Corruption all the way to the top. It's the American way, ironically I think the slogan "drain the swamp" works for both parties, as it's clear that the people that are in charge aren't willing to actually uphold the commitment they've made to the people.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

"This thing that one party did, multiple times, is the fault of both parties!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jaxiiruff@lemmy.zip 12 points 5 months ago

Microsoft is a pathetic little husk of a company, what a corny and predatory practice that not even google cares to do if you search other search engines.

[-] SnotFlickerman 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The Yes Men have already done it.

We need to get back to real fucking culture jamming. Andy Bichlbaum you're our only hope!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Mwa@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Besides Privacy DDG is wayy better then Google And Bing + It has a better search quality.

[-] toynbee@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

I prefer DDG to either as well, but in terms of search quality ... Don't they use Bing search results?

[-] Mwa@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago

Yes they use Bing but i think they did some adjustments to improve the search quality (Correct me if am wrong)

[-] conartistpanda@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

I disagree with the quality part.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 8 points 5 months ago

And just when I thought their endless begging couldn't get any more pathetic.
Soon enough they'll tell you a puppy dies every time you launch a non-edge browser

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Rinox@feddit.it 6 points 5 months ago

Wait, is Microsoft using Google's copyrighted work on their page without authorization? This is going to get pulled so fast they're gonna get whiplash.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Why would they? They can imitate Google's style w/o violating their copyright, it would actually be easier to reinvent the wheel than to try to somehow copy what Google has. It's nothing special, just a bit of padding and margin settings for result cards and whatnot.

[-] Syd@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago

Yeah this "Microsoft" group seems to be pretty established and it looks like they have decent resources.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago

And probably a lawyer or two to look things over.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

which has become a synonym for search engines or finding answers online.

If you’re my age, sure. But it’s crap.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
540 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

72360 readers
3627 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS