27

Summary

Nine states cutting income taxes on January 1, 2025: Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Carolina, and West Virginia.

Most reductions occur in Republican-led states, with changes like flat tax rates in Iowa (3.8%) and Louisiana (3%).

Democrat-led New Mexico targets middle- and low-income taxpayers.

Proponents argue these cuts enhance economic competitiveness, while critics warn of potential public service impacts.

Several states plan further reductions in coming years.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Terrapinjoe@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago

Louisiana is raising sales taxes as a result, so this effectively is just more switching the tax burden to lower income people.

[-] tiefling 1 points 2 days ago

That's just what the bootlickers want. They're happy to pay more in taxes as long as it punishes "undesirables"

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 27 points 3 days ago

I think most people have no understanding of taxes.

I remember a coworker some years ago fully believed we had a flat tax rate. That they just take 20% of your money. I had to explain progressive taxation to him.

We should be investing a lot more in public education.

We could lower taxes on the lower brackets, maybe, but we should be raising taxes that target the wealthy. Fix the "buy borrow die" strategy, too.

[-] astrsk@fedia.io 7 points 3 days ago

I had to explain how the progressive tax bracket works on a per-dollar-earned basis to my 65 year old mother last month. Turns out she had thought the different brackets were the amount paid in taxes on all of the income for the year based on year end totals, which is why she assumed the billionaires were getting hit with 37%+ tax and how it was unfair that poor people paid 10-20% and why she has been advocating and voting for a flat tax. She still isn’t changing her mind about anything but at least she now understands how each dollar is taxed I guess.

[-] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago

The lack of public education is what makes "opportunities" like a felon making it into the White House or any of the other batshit insane going-ons possible, and those that benefit would have it no other way.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Yes, we should. Sadly, in these Republican led states, the GOP has been gutting the education system since at least the Reagan era and they've been breathtakingly successful at it.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Unfortunately the wealthy already pay the lions share of taxes. What needs to happen is, we need less waste. So much spending is stolen by private companies via contracts that it's a joke. We're the wealthiest nation on the planet, yet we seem to always be broke.

[-] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago

As a condition of receiving federal funds, states with budget deficits shouldn't be allowed to cut income taxes; it's essentially passing off those costs to taxpayers in other states.

this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2025
27 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19287 readers
1615 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS