Ah yes the version of the picture with the earbud mouse cursor.
Most popular fashion item of 2025.
2024 had maga ear diapers, so that wouldn’t be too far out.
Our god has selected him! We must allow him to carry out the will of the player!!!
That’s how the patriarchy controlled his thoughts.
* Allegedly
Reminder Time's Person of the Year is based on how they influenced the year not if someone was good or bad. E.g. It's been Hitler, Stalin, Churchill, and FDR in that consecutive order before.
I'm not bias at all, but 2 of those I like /s
Who was Time's actual person this year, Putin? Steven Seagal?
Hell ifI know. That crypto-douche guy?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Trump. It was, both disturbingly and yet unsurprisingly, Trump.
Yeah I know. Another nail in th corporate media coffin.
Lol every fucking year people don’t get what Times Person of the Year is. It’s not a popularity contest, it’s which person dominated the media landscape in that year and how much that person influenced the year. Hitler and Stalin were also person of the year.
Remember when it was you? That was . . . quite a year.
Trump, as opposed to Zelensky in 2022.
2023 was Taylor Swift
Too bad he didn't do it.
Does it matter?
Just a reminder that Jury Nullification means you can decide that someone is guilty of a crime, but their actions were justified. This has historically been used to free people who aided escaping slaves in Northern courts.
Is this a meme or are you serious? If the latter, elaborate please
Well clearly he's innocent until he's proven guilty...
He ditched 2 backpacks 2 jackets, 2 pairs of pants, 2 masks, and kept the murder weapon on him, and also money from 2 countries, yet 0 evidence of him trying to leave the country? No airplane ticket.. which he could have used to leave the country immediately following the attack, yet... No evidence presented that a ticket was ever bought in his name or the fake ID name. So without intent to leave... Why have money you couldn't spend on the U.S. on your person?
The only thing we know for sure is that someone died, and they found someone they are blaming. Now if someone wanted that guy dead for being directly responsible for the deaths of ~51,000 people.. maybe a conspiracy would be that that this guy got caught on purpose knowing he has a solid allibi and would take all this time away from the true killer getting followed so they can get away.
Do I believe that? Who knows, it's conspiracy. But if they get it wrong once... What are the odds they'll ever be able to have a solid enough case against someone else? I'd say there would be room for reasonable doubt right from the start, meaning the charges should never stick
Fuckin love it! "The adjuster"
A bit tacky, but I can appreciate the statement with the geeky mouse cursor shaped ear buds.
A community to post anything related to Luigi Mangione.
This is not a pro-murder community. Please respect Lemmy.world ToS.
