1347

The French government is considering a law that would require web browsers – like Mozilla's Firefox – to block websites chosen by the government.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sourcery@lemmy.one 177 points 1 year ago

As always I am reminded that governments are run by the tech illiterate.

[-] Lafuma300@lemmy.world 91 points 1 year ago

If they were run by techies, they'd do even more damage. Authoritarianism is the issue, not tech literacy.

For real - look at the damage “tech literate” corporate leaders are doing to the internet in particular, and society in general. The issue is less about knowledge and aptitude, and more about morals and ethics, and how those principles interact with the desire for profitability driven by investors and owners.

[-] Squids@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 year ago

On one hand, yeah

On the other hand, I'm scared about the day when someone who is tech literate gets into government and tries to push stuff like this

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 year ago

Can't they just put a metal box with a guard around the entire internet?

It is just a black box with a blinking light anyway.

Although the guard might get tired from climbing the stairs of the Elizabeth tower every day.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] jsdz@lemmy.ml 60 points 1 year ago

Firefox being free software, it wouldn't make much sense for them to try and do something like this. So obviously we know that Mozilla would never go along with such an absurd law and start doing censorship on behalf of France. ... right, Mozilla? Slightly strange that you didn't say so?

[-] unscholarly_source@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 year ago

True... How would governments enforce dumb laws like that on open source software anyway?

[-] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Firefox is open source but it's controlled by the Mozilla Foundation.

The steps would be

  1. Pass the law
  2. Tell Mozilla they're breaking the law
  3. Do things to them as they're breaking the law

It could be fines, it could be banning firefox in France. The good/bad roles are flipped, but anything anyone has tried to do to meta can be done to Mozilla, too. The only alternative Mozilla would have would be purposefully pulling Firefox from France.

Ultimately, Mozilla would have a vote of some kind, deciding to capitulate or pull firefox (or just keep paying fees, potentially, but they're not made of money).

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They could still charge the leadership, fine them, and cause life to be a bit more difficult. Even if I don't live in a country, I wouldn't want that hanging over my head.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sab@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

I guess it cannot be completely enforced. What they can do, however, is to say that Firefox is illegal in France unless it complies with their unjust laws.

Mozilla could either choose to comply and release a French version of Firefox with government mandated fixes, or decide not to comply and probably block firefox.com from being accessible from France. This would make it harder for French users to find an alternative browser, making even more people will stick to the pre-installed Chromium based one.

In general it's just not a good thing when open source software becomes illegal, no matter how hard the laws might be to implement.

[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 year ago

Why would it be mozzilas responsibility to make their website unaccesible in france rather then that being the responsibility of french isp?

If north Korea puts up an obscure law that says all sites are banned from using english does that give them grounds to sue any sites that didn’t think of blocking them specifically?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] benpo@lemm.ee 55 points 1 year ago

Why forcing the browsers? Couldn't they just make a law for ISPs to block specific domains?

[-] Jomn@jlai.lu 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is already possible (and is actively used, mainly for piracy related websites) with the current laws.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Too easy to bypass that with a VPN, proxy, or alternative DNS.

[-] tourist@community.destinovate.com 22 points 1 year ago

Either way it's still a software restriction that can be bypassed with other software.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 year ago

Librewolf is going to get very popular...

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But like, can't they just download the non France version of Firefox? Isn't it open source? People can just build their own, right?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mojo@lemm.ee 54 points 1 year ago

Why do right wingers hate freedom so much?

[-] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 year ago

Its nothing to do with the right wing and everythiny to do with authoratarianism. Left wing authoratarians hate freedom just as much. They just usually attafk different targets.

[-] thecam@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Why do right wingers hate freedom so much?

What? Am I on crazy pills? This has nothing to do with polticial leaning. Its man VS big gov.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bahmanm@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago

"Do you not know my son, with how little wisdom the world is governed?" 🤷‍♂️

[-] feecoomeeq@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Ok, it's a freedom and free speech nightmare, but are they stupid or something? They are aiming for the browsers instead of ISPs (and DNSes?)?

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 20 points 1 year ago

They tried this in the UK and the ISPs is just ignored them. So the government declared its success anyway, despite the fact that essentially nothing had happened, and then stopped talking about it.

These laws always come up by people whose grasp of technology is basically, make magic box do thing x. They don't understand that people smarter than them (school kids) will find workarounds in about 10 seconds.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] KrimsonBun@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago
[-] Matcraftou@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I am French and I state that in fact I do not like France

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Trail@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

So things like curl or lynx would be illegal eh? Good luck enforcing those.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SnowBunting@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

Can we sign it even it we don't live in France?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] thecam@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

If worse comes to worst, someone can fork Firefox and remove the in-browser censorship. That is the beauty of FOSS.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Now imagine if something like this would happen after Google manages to DRM the internet? You won't even be able to fork the browser...

[-] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

Whelp, I signed in the dumbest way possible. Signed under the name Lupine Arsène. Only thing I regret is not putting the country as France to complete the dumb joke.

[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 15 points 1 year ago

Somehow, I don't think ruthless authoritarians are going to care about what the little people think.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Lazycog@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 year ago

Signed. Although I wanted to ask if it has any value if it was signed by someone from outside of France/not French?

[-] Jomn@jlai.lu 17 points 1 year ago

Even petitions from within France don't have any value. Our current government doesn't really care about this kind of action (or any type of action, actually).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RecursiveParadox@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Signed. Enough with this kind of bullshit in the EU.

[-] ULTIMATEDEAD@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

Russian propagandists claim, there is no democracy and no freedom of press in the west. It seems like, they were right in that regard.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sculd@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago

Can someone explain how this is enforceable??

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

Maybe this is a stupid question, but how does France have jurisdiction to force features into a web browser made by an American company?

[-] Waltzy@feddit.uk 18 points 1 year ago

They are free to try and compel them and Mozilla would be free to stop operating in France.

[-] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

What does "stop operating in France" even mean? It's not like they are selling their browser to the French people...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] beeb@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Signed and shared on Mastodon

[-] BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de 9 points 1 year ago

completely forgot to credit the one that made me aware of this: @LinuxCat

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
1347 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

31823 readers
168 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS