731
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 59 points 3 days ago
[-] DerArzt@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

41% of people they asked! Who knows what criteria they used to get their sample set, so the number may even be higher.

[-] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Also, do we know the specific wording? The wording of the questions around it? Those can have a significant impact on the answers.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 231 points 4 days ago
[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 112 points 4 days ago

People aren't exactly gonna tell a random stranger and probable Fed that they support murder even if it's really based

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 40 points 4 days ago

It's not illegal to say you believe Brian Robert Thompson deserved to die. Hell, you could, perfectly legally, file paperwork to hold a parade in Luigi's honor, right through the heart of DC. It's illegal to make death threats, but it's perfectly legal to express support for someone being killed.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago

With the incoming administration, I don't want to be on record as saying that.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 43 points 3 days ago

That sounds extremely low. What young voters are they polling? The Amish?

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 62 points 3 days ago

Yeah that is shocking. My guess is lots of people declined to say for obvious reasons. The number has to be closer to 80%

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

Cannot believe what our nation is coming to! How the hell is it under 50??

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DrFistington@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago

Gotta pump those numbers up. Those are rookie numbers!

[-] Womdat10 55 points 3 days ago
[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 36 points 3 days ago

I think of it this way. 41% are willing to say the killing was justified to a perfect stranger.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

Seems low. Like if they polled exclusively young conservatives or something.

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 days ago

I don't think I'd be considered "young" anymore, but I don't know if I'd say I support it.

Is the world better off without him? Yes.

Did he deserve to die? Yeah, probably.

Do I want to support vigilantism? Probably not.

Would it have been better if he had to deal with some terrible incurable and deadly disease? Yeah, if karma was real.

[-] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago

I'm almost 40. And I support it.

All other avenues are closed. All the proper and acceptable forms of redress are either coopted or outright captured. Civil, political, or otherwise. Peaceful Protest is universally ignored because it lacks the implicit threat of violence that makes it effective elsewhere in the world.

“When the people shall have nothing more to eat, they will eat the rich.” ~ Jean Jacques Rousseau

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 90 points 4 days ago
[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 58 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

There's a teensy bit of data massaging to make the approval rating appear lower... in my opinion of course.

The respondents were asked to rank "acceptability of the killers actions" on a scale of 1 to 5.

Assumin'the average "young voter" views gunning strangers down as:

[1.very unfavorable]

(You would, if asked about murder, say it was bad As a rule. right? I would too. Ya know, unless it was justified.)

Looking at it that way, the same data looks a lot different suddenly.

33% young voters still think the killer is completely unjustified.

7% think there was some justification

19% are undecided if the CEO deserved to die for what he did

24% think the killer was mostly justified... But have reservations

17% believe he was 100% in the right

I got a little free with the interpretations but you get the idea, You could decide to frame the data this way too. there's a saying: statistics don't lie but statisticians do. Here's my 100% true alternate title using the data but presented with the story I want to tell:

67% of Young Voters at Least Partly Approve of Killers Actions

[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 28 points 4 days ago

Selective selection of selected data by billionaire controlled media still can't get below 41%

It's awesome how willfully they exclude or manipulate in attempt to soften the information.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kurwa@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago

Yeah that's the shocking point for me

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 29 points 4 days ago

I'm of two minds about it. Half the time, I want to build a statue of Luigi

The other half of the time, I'm feeling the Tolkien quote, "many that live deserve death, and many that die deserve life. Will you give it to them?"

In other words, at no point do I feel that Brian Robert Thompson didn't objectively deserve to die. He is objectively doing more good for the world as worm food than he did as a living man. My only question is on the ethics of anyone actually killing him. On one hand, no one should have a right to make that call on their own. On the other, it's not like he was ever going to face justice any other way.

I wonder if this dilemma is reflected in this poll. You can believe that killing the CEO was unacceptable, while also believing he absolutely deserved it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 19 points 3 days ago

They also claim that they want more equality, universal healthcare, less student debt, etc. And then a ton of them proceeded to vote for Donald Trump. I can't take anything they say seriously.

[-] Solumbran@lemmy.world 107 points 4 days ago
[-] i_dont_want_to 58 points 4 days ago

When I was young, I wouldn't have found it acceptable. It doesn't matter how badly you're treated, you need to find a peaceful way to resist. It's something drilled into my and my peers' skulls since I can remember.

After seeing little progress (but mostly worsening) with polite requests and peaceful protests, I really can't figure out how it can be unacceptable.

A lot of those kids probably just haven't gained that wisdom yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago

For one thing, you can sympathize but not find it acceptable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 41 points 3 days ago

Many of these polls are written in way to ellicit a biased response.

Others have already covered how this works, but I'll add to it anyway.

If you ask a question like "do you condemn violence against healthcare CEOs?" A lot of people are going to say yes, because they view themselves as people against violence and respond mostly to that first part.

If you ask "did brian thompson deserve to die for his crimes? Many of the same people will say yes to that too, because people have an innate desire for justice.

Polls do this all the time. It's part of social engineering and plays on the phenomenon that the Asch Conformity Experiments analyzed. Around 35% of people will change their opinions to fit everyone else's even if the answer or opinion is very obviously incorrect.

Don't let them take the narrative back.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] john89@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 days ago

Only 41%?

We still have work to do.

[-] Heikki@lemm.ee 13 points 3 days ago

I mean, "Broadly gesturing to everything"

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 50 points 4 days ago

That is shocking. Get your shit together, 59%!

[-] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 26 points 3 days ago

That low? That is a shock.

[-] melisdrawing@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago

Young, like under 26? Like never having had to supply their own health insurance maybe?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 65 points 4 days ago

The fact that politicians and executives consider this a “shock” is part of the problem.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago

110% of all statistics are made up on the spot.

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 55 points 4 days ago

I doubt I’m "young" but I find it acceptable. I’m only shocked it doesn’t happen more. These people making insane amounts of money off the suffering of the working class have been getting away with too much for too long.

[-] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 26 points 4 days ago

They make money by murdering people. Someone has to hold them to account since our justice system, which is bought and paid for by these same scumbags, surely won't.

[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

A person has to ask themselves the question of does this person help or hurt humanity, and if you look at this company denials since he took over he definetely hurts humanity as a whole.

Not every human life is valuable or worth keeping. We need to treat our weakest members of society better, which is elderly, disabled and children. He hurts those people the most, when he should've trying to protect them. He chose to chase profits over human life.

This is simply a logical consequence. Income equality now is FAR worse than the french revolution, I'm just suprised it took this long.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Every life is valuable and sacred. Every death a tragedy. But I will not cry when tragedy comes for those who grow rich by permitting tragedy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ef9357@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 3 days ago

Shock poll? Who is shocked?

[-] Walk_blesseD 18 points 3 days ago

I'm shocked that the number isn't higher, does that count?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 4 days ago

The generation whose future was stolen by greedy, sociopathic billionaires doesn’t care if they get killed. Fetch my fainting couch!

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 34 points 4 days ago
[-] oakey66@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago

It’s not shocking if you’ve had to deal with any sort of healthcare in this god forsaken shithole of a country.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago

It’s a wake up call, but it’s not really going to change anything. You want universal healthcare? We need a general strike. Shut everything down for a month and demand it.

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

Just 41%?

The pain felt in the US is still not high enough.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 3 days ago

I don't understand what's shocking about that?

I would have called that predictable.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago

It seems pretty low

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago

Americans have been trained to wish on the CEO the negative things that those CEOs have caused.

Game CEO cancels or ruins an anticipated game? Wish on to them that something they value gets canceled.

Car company CEO makes cars more expensive? Wish upon them financial trouble.

Social media CEO invades your privacy? Wish on them someone to track their plane wherever it flies.

But there exists a subset of companies where death is the outcome of a bad CEO, and the end consequence of encouraging an eye for an eye is what we just saw. Perhaps if a company can decide whether you live or die, the government should play some role in it. Then at least voters will at least have a stake in the governance.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
731 points (100.0% liked)

News

23622 readers
2483 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS