524
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

“This was not reckless driving. This was murder,” the judge said before she read out Mackenzie Shirilla's verdict Monday afternoon.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 310 points 1 year ago

The reason why they say this was murder:

Two weeks before the crash, she allegedly threatened to crash her vehicle when she was driving with Russo because she was upset over a disagreement they had. Russo called his mother and asked to be picked up, and a friend ended up retrieving him. In a phone call with Russo, the friend allegedly overheard Shirilla say, “I will crash this car right now,” prosecutors said in court documents.

This isn't a drunk driver, or a thrillseeker, this is someone with murderous intent.

[-] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 62 points 1 year ago

Considering she was unconscious as well, sounds like it was a murder/suicide attempt.

[-] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 14 points 1 year ago

Sounds more like a suicide/self harm thing to me.

[-] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@kbin.social 72 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

When you include an unconsenting person in the attempt, it is also murder.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] JoBo@feddit.uk 38 points 1 year ago

It sounds much more like an abusive relationship. She was trying to punish him, regardless of the risk to herself.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

A woman kills family then kills self. Is it murder?!!!! Oh. No, just self-harm.

load more comments (2 replies)

If you attempt to kill yourself and take other people with you, it's commonly called murder/suicide. Killing people with intent is usually murder.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] 18_24_61_b_17_17_4@lemmy.world 81 points 1 year ago

Fucking hell that is horrible. And of course she's the only one to survive. 100mph into a brick building has probably left her pretty physically fucked up and in constant pain. Hope she enjoys feeling that way in prison for the rest of her life.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 62 points 1 year ago

Remind me why we allow teenagers to drive 3-ton vehicles again?

[-] kozy138@lemm.ee 68 points 1 year ago

"Gotta get them teens to work. And no public transit options please, they make my money pile smaller."

-CEO's everywhere

[-] OrnateLuna 46 points 1 year ago

Why do we allow most people to drive 3 ton vehicles

[-] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 40 points 1 year ago

Remind the rest of us why anycunt needs a 3 ton personal vehicle again?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] krayj@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because the vast majority of them don't use the 3ton vehicle to commit murder.

You do know that adults use vehicles as murder weapons also, yeah?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] _wintermute@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

The same reason we all have a personal 3 ton vehicle: to ensure we remain bound to a culture of sprawling roads and fossil fuel consumption.

So they can be exploited for cheep labor.

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] kyden@l.cackl.io 57 points 1 year ago

I am truly sorry for the passengers. Lost life because of teenage perceived hardship is tragic.

From a different perspective, it seems incredibly impressive that anyone survived a deliberate head on collision with a brick wall (that appears to have barely buckled) at 100 MPH / 161 KMH.

[-] Siegfried@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thanks for the Christianization of the speed units, God bless you

Survived and still standing on her feet...

[-] Saturdaycat@kbin.social 45 points 1 year ago

Wow the way she's crying is disgusting, she's just sorry for herself not for the deaths she caused. No remorse, only regret for getting sentenced

[-] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

Wow the way she’s crying is disgusting, she’s just sorry for herself not for the deaths she caused. No remorse, only regret for getting sentenced

How do you know that? I don’t know about you but I’ve done things in anger that I felt genuine remorse for later.

Never killed anyone though, I suppose.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

Prosecutor: What gear were you in at the moment of impact?

Defendant: Gucci sweats and Reebok Classics.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kite@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

There are a lot of people in this post spouting their opinion on an article they very clearly did not read.

[-] Nyanix@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 year ago

Jesus, I sympathize, this is awful...i was t-boned by a teen going 85 mph, I wish my attorneys had the same teeth this judge does

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 16 points 1 year ago

I'm sorry that happened... but that's not why she said it. This girl accelerated full speed, without attempting to slow down at all, straight into a brick wall. Those teens probably weren't trying to hit you, this girl very very very likely was trying to hit that wall and kill everyone in the car.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

Anyone with a legal background able to help me understand how two deaths resulted in 4 murder convictions and 2 vehicular homicide convictions?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] girlfreddy@mastodon.social 13 points 1 year ago

@Buffalox @MicroWave

Often the driver does survive catastrophic accidents vs front passengers.

https://emj.bmj.com/content/21/2/197

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thank you, but that's a lot of reading for a simple question.

Statistical analysis was by χ2 test; a p value of less than 0.05 was assumed to correlate with a significant difference in rates of injury.

Oh yes it's all clear to me now.

I know it used to be like that before air bags and safety belts, because the steering wheel takes some of the blow in frontal collisions. But such dramatic difference I suspected she might have made the collision worse for the passengers on purpose.

PS She is probably a narcissist: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12417047/Mackenzie-Shirilla-TikTok-doing-drugs-not-dying-jailed-murdering-boyfriend-friend-drugged-100mph-crash.html

PPS: The article I found describes that her survival was miraculous, and she had surgery.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

This is an unbelievable tragedy, for all of them. She just turned 18, I wonder what her sentence will be like. I assume that in the US - unlike the situation over here in Europe - there is no special "juvenile justice" for young adults, so she might face multiple lifetimes in prison after being convicted for murder. If I remember correctly you can get separate sentences for each victim, which will sum up to your total sentence.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's a tragedy for the victims and their families, but I'm sorry, I can't feel sorry for her. Seems she planned to harm them for petty reasons because she feels entitled. Probably a narcissist:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12417047/Mackenzie-Shirilla-TikTok-doing-drugs-not-dying-jailed-murdering-boyfriend-friend-drugged-100mph-crash.html

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
524 points (100.0% liked)

News

23353 readers
2734 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS