49
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] moody@lemmings.world 28 points 1 day ago

If Israel cared about hostages being released, they would have handled it by now. They've given up on saving the hostages, and just using them as an excuse to massacre civilians.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

To the people who stayed home or voted 3rd party because they claimed to care about the people of Gaza.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

How about you fucking wait until we see what he'll do before being smug about it? He says "hell to pay" but that's exactly what Biden has been doing, with more platitudes.

[-] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Fair enough. It’s just sad that more people have to die but you are correct that Biden isn’t doing a damn thing either.

[-] Questy@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago

Oh my god, they wouldn't consider genocide would they?!

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago

Is carpet bombing the entire area and everyone in it genocide?

[-] clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

For Trump that's just preparing the terrain for real estate development.

Gaza sits on such a valuable beachfront! But those ugly ruins... Someone ought raze them down

[-] Glasgow@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

Now they’re gonna do super genocide and expand to Greater Israel

[-] Fitik@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

Maybe HAMAS should release the hostages then?

[-] BMTea@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Does Hamas have any guarantee that doing so will stop a single thing Israel is doing or will do? The answer is clearly no because - as even rational factions in Israel will concede - the war is about population engineering, land annexation and settlement, not the hostages. It was clear from the very first two weeks when that intelligence report leaked laying out war options which included exactly what we are seeing, when Israeli leadership declared starvation plans and stated that Gaza would be reduced to a "city of tents." And just last week the IDF let kahanist lunatic settler Daniella Weiss enter the strip to survey land for settlement. The hostages don't matter on any political level, only on a propaganda, morale and moral level.

[-] superb 10 points 1 day ago

Hamas cant even be sure that the IDF won’t shoot the hostages

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Can't tell if trumper or centrist.

[-] the_tab_key@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

"Trump for peace"

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 1 day ago

Oh but haven't you heard? No wars under Trump. Trump will end it as soon as he takes office, or so I heard from some voters dumb enough to no longer be in my life.

[-] Zier@fedia.io 8 points 1 day ago

LOL! Fat Donnie will help Netanyahoo delete Gaza. What a scum!

[-] whithom@discuss.online 1 points 1 day ago

ML: but what about genocide Joe?!?!

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago
[-] whithom@discuss.online 1 points 1 day ago

He will build a golf course on all that newly available beach front property.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Is it possible a deal is nearing, and Donald Trump is posturing to take credit for it?

[-] EndOfLine@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

The Biden administration has been working since last year with Israel and international mediators, including Qatar and Egypt, on a cease-fire deal that would include release of the hostages.

I'm sure this is just a coincidence and all that was really needed to end the conflict was an old man yelling "Don't make me come in there".

After all, Hamas has such a long history of being scared of the US and trying to avoid poking that particular bear. /s

More likely he is posturing to take credit for whatever he can regardless of the outcome.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Yup, we elected Trump again. And there'll be Hell Toupee.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago
[-] beansbeansbeans@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Isn't this the fascist that called prisoners of war losers? As if he gives two shits about hostages...

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 23 points 1 day ago

Well, this is what the people in Dearborn voted for.

They get to watch the carpet bombing of Gaza.

Or he'll drop a nuke. Because that's the hardest anyone has been hit in our long and storied history.

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is what the people in Dearborn voted for—along with the people of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, and others.

Across the board, almost every category trended rightward (edit: by way of staying home, you know what I mean) since the last election. Ask yourself: why is your first instinct to attack the tiny minority in Michigan who have been treated as subhuman for months? They’ve been held in constant limbo while their families are killed, ignored as they plea for mercy from a government that continually sinks deeper into racism and hatred.

If I saw my friends and family being treated like irrational animals, I might not be surprised to feel the urge to act irrationally.

You’re not even wrong about your statements, but … have some damn empathy.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

It didn't trend rightward.

Democrats stayed home just like they did in 2016.

They were convinced through our republican controlled media that voting wasn't worth the effort.

So now my empathy isn't worth their's. I hope all 88 million who stayed home on election day have a completely hellish next 2 years. I'm circling my wagons right here at home and watching those apathetic fuckers learn a major lesson.

It's probably the only way they will learn to pay attention. Or they will die from some weird ass disease.

Happy Holidays!

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

It's not "empathy" if it's part of some imagined negotiation in your mind.

[-] BMTea@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Oh no! The carpet bombing of Gaza! Would hate to see that when Biden is out of office! Trump is going to hit the 25% of the remaining buildings!

[-] ATDA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I was thinking, hell to pay? Is that like, the name of the last neighborhood left or?

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 points 1 day ago

He'd have to drop 3 to make it harder.

[-] BMTea@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Gazans with infected amputation wounds starving in tents: "Oh no! He'll take away our 1 daily piece of bread."

this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
49 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19158 readers
2498 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS