301
submitted 2 weeks ago by ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] copygirl 177 points 2 weeks ago

30% is the industry standard across the board, with the exception of Epic which takes 12%. However, Epic has already shown that it's ready to dump loads of money into store exclusivity deals and tons of free games, so I will argue it's for the sake of growing the number of users and developers using their platform.

But do they, or any other competitor or similar store, offer the same functionality as Steam? rtxn already mentioned some. And there's more. And then there's the fact that Valve is using all that money not only to stuff the pockets of alread rich people (not that Gabe isn't a multi-millionaire if not billionaire, idk), but actually puts it back into the industry: Their own store, Linux/Proton (you may not care, but Microsoft becoming a monopoly in PC gaming is no good), and hardware (with their Steam Deck handheld, and VR stuffs).

Steam might be the biggest player when it comes to storefronts, but it's because they've actually earned it. And they're not actively preventing other competitors from entering the scene (other than existing). In fact, they keep trying, and keep failing, and then going back to Steam.

I'm not opposed to more money going to developers, but let's not single out Steam, who (perhaps besides GOG? I am not familiar enough with it) is doing the most for users and develpers.

[-] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 91 points 2 weeks ago

Epic is in stage 1 of enshittification. They will offer a great deal (at their economic expense) to capture users and providers.

[-] babybus@sh.itjust.works 48 points 2 weeks ago

It isn't enshittification because they never had a high-quality product to offer.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (46 replies)
[-] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 166 points 2 weeks ago

Steam singlehandedly stopped piracy overnight for me.

Developers were getting $0 from me before steam, and thousands of $$$ from me after steam.

The 30% cut is well worth it for developers, plus all the other services steam provides. Kids have no idea how buying, installing, modding, patching games used to be like.

You cant compare this to the apple app store

Name another platform that has gone 20 years without completely enshittifying itself.

We can start shitting on steam when they turn evil

[-] Sorse@discuss.tchncs.de 57 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Name another platform that has gone 20 years without completely enshittifying itself.

Wik*pedia?

[-] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 51 points 2 weeks ago

I mean a for-profit corporation owned by an ex-microsoft employee...

Everything about that screams enshittification, but they've done a pretty good job to be relatively consumer friendly.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)
[-] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 112 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's kinda funny to read through this thread ngl.

Everyone claiming: "OH WOW PRICES WILL BE LOWER" or "OH MAN DEVS WILL PROFIT SO MUCH MORE!!!!!"

You know who profits? Publishers. The ones already taking 80 - 90% of a games revenue. Devs don't see shit of that. And for indie devs that don't have a publisher, the 30% cut is a godsend considering that steam is handling everything in the distribution chain.

You guys are fighting for corpos that want to buy their 5th luxury yacht.

[-] micka190@lemmy.world 47 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

People who genuinely believe game prices will get lowered if stores take a smaller cut are delusional. You can literally look at the Epic Game Store and see that it isn't even remotely true. The only games on there that are cheaper than on Steam are the ones Epic invested in specifically to entice developers/gamers to use their services. The ones that don't have exclusivity deals are the same as on Steam.


Edit: changed "take a cut" to "take a smaller cut".

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[-] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 103 points 2 weeks ago

free market mfs when consumers choose the option that doesn't shit on them:

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Stern@lemmy.world 80 points 2 weeks ago

My extremely Baby's First Monopoly take is that whatever your feelings about specific aspects of Steam's service, or Valve in general, no individual company should exert this much power over the fortunes and overall culture of an artform. As such, I welcome efforts such as Wolfire's to challenge Valve and Steam, even if I may not agree with the detail of the suit in question.

What a stupid take. Valve isn't doing anything anti competitive, they just provide an objectively better service which is why everyone uses it. Anyone can put their game up on Steam, Gog, Epic, Uplay, and Origin at the same time. Valve doesn't own the space, and tbh we're probably getting the best deal we can get with them being the top dog, cuz you know Microsoft and the like would never treat us that well.

The closest thing I can think of wrt competitive rules is their price parity rule, where if you sell your steam keys (note that. not epic or uplay, just steam.) yourself, the price can't be noticeably lower (or a sale can't happen) without a comparable discount/sale on Steam within a reasonable timeframe.

load more comments (26 replies)
[-] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 57 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

They can use alternative stores if they want. Its not our fault the alternatves bar gog are shit and anti consumer. Valve is the only one supporting linux so I'm buying my games there to support that effort.

Also steam has a lot more than just the store. The chats, the media sharing, the forums, cloud saves and input profiles. Epic can't even show you a list of games in your library when you log in. I claim the free games each week but ive never even bothered to play them as with steam I can just click play and get on with it. As a long time linux user I value the just works approach and the work that wine and valve have put in.

[-] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 weeks ago

I won't use GOG till they make Linux use easy.
Bought Skyrim and Doom II then proceeded to spend 45 minutes struggling to getting them to work. Decided that it wasnt worth the effort when Steam just works™️ and bought them there.

Id prefer if valve took less from developers but I value being able to actually play my games more than I value a couple bucks. Also their cloud saves make multi device gaming so much better. If steam eventually enshittifies and takes my games away I'll just pirate them and struggle with 'Wine' then.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 42 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

lol, replace Valve with Apple and Steam with App Store and everyone would have a very different tone on here despite the fact that they both charge 30%.

[-] Sickday@kbin.earth 59 points 2 weeks ago

That'd be false equivalence. Valve doesn't own the platform in which they distribute games. Valve doesn't own Windows, macOS, or Linux, and to my knowledge they don't enforce any platform-specific restrictions like Apple does. Not sure why you'd swap the two with regards to this case.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] OrgunDonor@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

This will always be funny to me. In no other aspect of my life do I even know the charge of distributors or shops is, and I dont give a fuck. I still don't know why I as a consumer should give a fuck because that aint my problem.

I go where the best service and the best options for me are. In terms of digital games stores, Steam is easily that platform. In terms of phone platforms, for me it is easily not apple, I coule not care how much people charge to sell in their stores.

I do care about dumb monopolistic limitations though, things like apple forcing browsers to use webkit. That would be like steam forcing all games to use the source engine. Apple not allowing people to install their own store fronts, Google making that more difficult, Steam not allowing you to install Epic... oh wait.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
301 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

8760 readers
590 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS