211
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 102 points 1 year ago

It's still just money laundering

[-] ambitious_bones@lemmy.world 84 points 1 year ago

For anyone else wondering:

"The artwork owner is given a certificate of authenticity that the work was created by Cattelan as well as instructions about how to replace the fruit when it goes bad."

[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

Ductaping a banana on a wall needs instructions?

[-] Zier@fedia.io 10 points 1 year ago

Don't underestimate how dumb people can be.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Howtobasic taught me how to touch wall with apple

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The type of idiot that pays 6.2 million dollars for a duct taped banana exhibit needs those instructions.

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 76 points 1 year ago

It's one banana, what could it cost, 6.2 million?

[-] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 65 points 1 year ago

Anyone who says the rich deserve to BE rich because they are "clever businessmen" need to repeatedly kicked in the balls.

Most folks could live comfortably for the rest of their lives on what this idiot spent on a banana.

[-] LowtierComputer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

All people really...

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago

This is a special keystone headline used to warn time travellers to keep on driving to the next timeline, this one is cooked, attempt no landing here

[-] Modva@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago

I'll never understand spending that money like that instead of helping kids with cancer.

Probably one of the several reasons why I am not rich.

[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 24 points 1 year ago

It's usually an investment. Or in this case: a publicity stunt.

[-] itsathursday@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

Fuck this insufferable world.

[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

~~surely the banana is rotten by now wasn't this years ago~~ yup he just replaced the banana so he just ate... a banana, which he could've done with every previous banana that went rotten too if he doesn't mind soft bananas

[-] Zier@fedia.io 18 points 1 year ago

Wow food prices have really risen.

[-] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

I respect every part except "crypto entrepreneur".

[-] Wimopy@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

I think it adds to the contemporary symbolism.

[-] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Idk it seems par for the course

The 34-year-old crypto businessman was last year charged by the US Securities and Exchange Commission with fraud and securities law violation in relation to his crypto project Tron.

[-] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago
[-] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thank you! The whole point of the artwork is that it can reproduced by anyone.

[-] GeekMan@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

There's never been a better time to reference Arrested Development;

"There's ALWAYS, money, in the Banana Stand"

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

wow that is a very long article to say bullshit

[-] VubDapple@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago
[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

NFT artists kind of hide behind the oldschool art world to justify it...

I think it shows how stupid that world is.

The point of art is to move people, to make them think and feel something by conveying the artist's thoughts, not be a store of value. And while I've been to museums with gorgeous pieces, if you're paying millions for a painting, at some point most of that value is the gratification of hoarding it. That same money could buy you an incredible experience in today's art landscape, but it's not about the experience, is it? And NFTs are like the perfect deconstruction of that.

That being said, OP I am downvoting your post because eyeballs are exactly what crypto bros want, no offense :P

[-] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The money wouldn't be better off sitting in his bank account.

[-] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

He spent $6m on something. If he didn't spend it, it'd just be sitting in a bank. At least now it's out in the wild.

this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2024
211 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

21484 readers
1237 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS