432
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 21 points 2 days ago

Like only the West has gone Fascist...

[-] tibi@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

In the Romanian presidential elections we just had, we have a fascist extreme right-wing candidate who got 1st place (note that we have a 2 round election system and this was only the first round). He appeared out of nowhere with a TikTok campaign, he didn't have a traditional ad campaign, he didn't participate in any debates, a lot of people who don't use TikTok haven't even heard about him. We will know in 2 weeks if we become fascist or not.

There are 2 problems. First is the hybrid war going on. The western world needs to do better. Ban TikTok and take drastic measures to limit the spread of misinformation and propaganda on social media.

The second big problem is that western leaders are ignoring the real problems affecting average people. The out of control immigration (the problem isn't with the people immigrating, but with a system unable to integrate them into the rest of the society), rising costs, unaffordable housing, huge tax burden are real problems that aren't being addressed. People are rightfully angry with the current leaders and are looking for alternatives. But most people aren't very smart or care enough about politics, so they are easy prey to propaganda and extremist groups that are calling out these problems.

[-] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 4 points 2 days ago

In my opinion, what stresses people is not rising costs etc..it is the eroding of quality of life that they are used to.

  • Rising costs are only a problem if wages are stagnant or as is often the case, falling in real terms.
  • Unaffordable housing is a major systemic issue, mainly being caused by inadequate supply. We have major issues in NZ with crazy house prices. The problem of high housing costs can't be solved quickly.
  • Huge tax burden is again not a problem if the social contract is being upheld. But as is often the case, the social contract is being eroded. We are paying the same tax as we were last year, but suddenly the services we receive for that money are reduced or removed.

For example in New Zealand, the previous government removed the co-payment on prescriptions from the pharmacy. The current government has brought it back, services have gotten worse over the time also...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 27 points 2 days ago

Mexican here. Last month, a reporter known for being critical of the government was fired live in the middle of his segment. We're definitely going fascist.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 21 points 2 days ago

Yeah, this is a strangely euro-centric viewing. It needs to include so many more places. Russia is a big one that's missing, for another example, and there are a ton more. We're in bad economic times, which is where Fascists thrive. On the good side, leftists can also take advantage of it to actually help people if they succeed.

[-] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

We're only in bad economic time because the wealthy elites and corporation gobbled up everything away from the public, which makes it even more sad.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

Yes, but it's bad for everyone but them. The reason doesn't really matter. It's the same as always. It's mostly the same conditions that led to the last rise in fascism.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

No, the reason absolutely does matter. If we were all suffering because of a global drought, that would be entirely different than all of us starving and going homeless at the peak of human production.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

Sure, but the reason is always the same. It's rich people taking everything. There's way more than enough food and water for everyone, and that'll be true for a very long time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Do you know of any English coverage? That's very interesting

[-] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Here. I'm afraid there isn't much that's interesting about it other than the fact that it happened in the first place — I only singled it out because it's quite recent. If you want something interesting, though, how about the time our president straight up doxed a New York Times reporter on live TV?

[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The map is misleading. The other "non-West" countries are leading the pack. We humans, from space, must look like starlings.

[-] Zementid@feddit.nl 19 points 2 days ago

India and China are missing. Japan is pretty fascist too... at least when compared to European "fascist" countries marked in the map.

Apart from that... the amount of fascism is too damn high!

[-] BluesF@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Is Japan "going" or just sitting roughly where it's been for decades? I don't know enough about Japanese politics but it doesn't seem from my perspective like it moves fast.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] nifty@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

People are collectively losing their minds if their think any western country is anywhere near fascism. Have you lived in Russia or North Korea?

Western nations are losing the psyops war, which is what you see in a lot of countries.

The main problem is that our representatives and elected officials are just as likely to believe emotional propaganda as any regular person.

This is why we need better public education, so the general population, including any elected official, has better critical thinking.

[-] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

We've normalized mass surveillance. Local police have full, warrantless access to your travel habits from licence plate cameras. I can buy all of the data on you and find your political ideology. People are prosecuted for their political beliefs and actions every day.

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Even if you, a private citizen, buys someone data to intimidate them, it just amounts to stalking and harassment. That’s not fascism.

If you’re saying that the government is outsourcing stalking and harassment of private citizens via these means, then that’s an interesting take. Personally, I think a government body may not necessarily have anything to do with such a thing, but private entities with resources could do it. Like some crazed hedge fund dude targeting anti-genocide protesters. These private entities may even get government contracts, so who knows.

In U.S. history civil rights activists were straight up assassinated, and so were U.S. presidents who got too uppity as far as someone else was concerned. Environmental or social justice activists were always targeted or tracked by govt. agencies. The regular person who holds spicy political takes on any ideology isn’t a concern unless they’re in the news or getting attention.

I am not naive about the state of things, but I also don’t think they’re any worse than they’ve been before in terms of govt control over activism. The main problem now is psyops at scale. Countries like China and Russia safeguard themselves from it by having a homogenous culture, which is antithetical to democracies.

Tbh it’s not mass surveillance that adds chilling effects to activist action, but the constant seizing of power and resources by oligarchs. I think in this instance people who want change should become a part of the system, ie the government or its agencies.

If we fool ourselves into thinking the U.S. or any other western state is as bad as current fascists regimes, we’ve lost the psyops war. Can things be better, yes. There’s no way to get that without organizing for change, and creating strong local communities.

[-] DeadWorldWalking@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

I'm pretty sure moving into a administration who plans on mass deportations requiring holding camps, literal work camps for the mentally ill, and the degradation of regulations/rights are all clear signs we are moving in that direction.

I mean come on man, Trump couldn't have his first pick for AG be approved because he said "We will drag the bodies of our political opponents through the streets" he said that, and that was Trump's first choice for the most powerful prosecutor in the country.

When the fascists show us who they are WE SHOULD BELIEVE THEM!

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

Without reference to other nations and countries, what elements of fascism do you believe are missing that makes the label inaccurate or inappropriate

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I think the main difference is that people who hold different political opinions are not randomly falling out of windows

The other difference is that you can have protests and still get what you want. Or you can vote and still have the change you voted for count.

If voting didn’t matter at all in the US or other democracies, psyop campaigns wouldn’t be targeting the citizens, but only the leaders or officials, elected or otherwise

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

When you say "randomly falling out windows," I think you mean that the state is not assassinating its own citizens to protect the electability of the (small-F) fascist ruling party. That's a pretty specific line to draw. I'm not sure if that's what you mean because you continue to cloak your meaning in euphemism and irony.

You say that there are still elections where votes are counted fairly, and that public speech is still permitted. I would suggest that is not the minimum requirement for a fair election or political empowerment. It's interesting that you suppose that psyops exist and are effective against voters, but that there are still free elections where people are able to enact the changes they have presumably been induced to want.

It sounds very much like you are saying, "yes, while it resembles fascism in every way, real fascism would be the same thing but worse." You can appreciate I am sure that other people have other standards, and that yours are not really universally accepted. John Kelly gave a very good off-the-cuff definition recently. Rather than presenting my own, I invite you to refute his.

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

not assassinating its own citizens

I meant more as in opposition party members or political foes are not routinely disposed of

If people have the standards you claim they do, they sure as hell don’t vote that way.

So I guess a more educated public might help in this case? How do you tell people they have it worse off? Americans are so dumb that they can’t even look at Nordic countries for good examples of how to be.

[-] Delphia@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

Australia is facist now?

Fuck guess I missed it, was outside all day too.

[-] finderscult@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago

You guys are seriously arguing for a ministry of truth.

[-] TassieTosser@aussie.zone 7 points 2 days ago

Eh, we find that out next year if the cookers are stupid enough to vote Dutto in.

[-] goodthanks@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

It's not just the cookers. It's also the media illiterate and unengaged. I'm constantly shocked at how insular our population is. It feels like a ticking time bomb.

[-] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Oh, they are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago
[-] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago
[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago
[-] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 days ago

Thanks to putin and his psyops war

[-] fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

Its certainly a key part of it

[-] Zorque@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago

We just wanna be like everyone else, is that so wrong?

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 20 points 3 days ago

Hear, hear. Let’s commit to fighting fascism as enthusiastically as Putin!

[-] Incandemon@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 days ago

So, not particularly effectively and using it as an increasingly threadbare excuse for maintaining the status quo?

[-] Fleur_@lemm.ee 14 points 2 days ago

Ah yes. The west. Famously known for being the most authoritarian of geopolitical regions.

In the memes defense you can't be moving towards authoritarianism if you're already there.

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 9 points 2 days ago

They said fascist, you can be authoritarian without being fascist.

How do you know Shrek isn't portraying someone in the west asking the rest of the west to stop turning fascist?

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] shawn1122@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

I mean...yes. But more often through colonial enterprises.

[-] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 14 points 3 days ago
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Please remove Quebec from that map, we’re definitely not going fascists!

[-] wholookshere 6 points 2 days ago

I'm not sure I call banning hijabs in all public service roles in the name of "secularism" isn't a great start...

https://montreal.ctvnews.ca/here-s-how-people-are-reacting-after-bill-21-was-upheld-by-the-quebec-court-of-appeal-1.6789650

[-] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

I wish your neighbours were smarter ;(

[-] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
432 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

1160 readers
6 users here now

Non political memes: !memes@sopuli.xyz

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS