701
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ROAGO@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Why is everyone acting like this is a thing that will happen? All they have to do is wait roughly 90 days and it'll all go away.

Don't fucking let Musk buy it though

[-] daggermoon@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago

What company could actually afford to buy it other than Google, Meta, or Amazon? Unless they are forced to sell it at a loss, which is fine with me.

[-] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 42 points 2 days ago

By "sell," they could also mean ending up having Chrome just split off from Google, as a new, independent entity that is its own company, without anybody needing to buy it in the first place.

[-] gap_betweenus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

How exactly is this company going to make any money?

[-] AhismaMiasma@lemm.ee 10 points 2 days ago

I assume by continuing to sell data.

[-] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago

Selling user data, selling ad placement, subscriptions for paid services, enterprise-grade support contracts, and the like.

They could also take an approach similar to Google, branching back out from being just a browser into a suite of related tools that Chrome can then convince users to switch to (similar to how Chrome gets users to not just use Google search, but also services like Gmail too.)

[-] Radiantprime@feddit.uk 9 points 2 days ago
[-] dinckelman@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

With all due respect for Valve, they don't need this. They exist in their niche, and they're exceptionally good at doing their work

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 8 points 2 days ago

Oracle, sun, tencent, tita...

[-] pewgar_seemsimandroid 4 points 2 days ago

oracle would create MANGO (Microsoft,Apple,nvidia,google and Oracle)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] renegadespork 6 points 2 days ago

Microsoft is probably drooling at the prospect. They’ve been trying to get that IE monopoly back since this happened to them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mosscap@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

Trump will let this go through and behind the scenes force a deal where X buys Chrome

[-] 200ok@lemmy.world 191 points 3 days ago

Alphabet’s Chief Legal Officer Kent Walker, says the DOJ is pushing “a radical interventionist agenda that would harm Americans and America’s global technology leadership.”

I'm honestly curious how this would "harm Americans".

[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 92 points 3 days ago

Google pretending they have any other nationality other then “the global internet” is cute in a disgusting way.

[-] ladicius@lemmy.world 81 points 3 days ago

That statement is technically true.

The billionaire owners are Americans.

[-] Beldarofremulak@lemmy.world 39 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Everyone really does need to have that at the forefront of their mind. When the C-suit, wall street, and politicians talk about "Americans" they aren't talking about us schlubs.

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 2 points 2 days ago

I refuse to call any Billionaires Americans. A billionaire in America has far more in common with a billionaire in Ireland or France than with working class Americans. They don't use our schools, drink our water, drive our roads, or rely on our safety nets. They don't take out the trash, do their laundry, wait 6 months for a doctor's appointment, or stress over defunding their retirement to pay for needed medication.

Billionaire involvement in politics should be considered foreign interference. Of course AIPAC is foreign interference too, but apparently that's not a problem either.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 days ago

It harms wealthy asshole Americans at Google.

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago

Alphabet’s Chief Legal Officer sounds like Donald Trump

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 123 points 3 days ago

This is the last antitrust win we'll get for years, isn't it?

I know Trump doesn't like Big Tech, but I doubt his admin will punish them meaningfully, but just rail about censorship.

[-] babybus@sh.itjust.works 75 points 3 days ago

This isn't a win I think. They are yet to meet in the court with Google.

The DOJ will file a revised version of its proposals in early March, before the government and Google return to the DC District Court in April for a two-week remedies trial.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 102 points 3 days ago

Ehh just fight it for a month pay king trump some money and bam their golden.

[-] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 42 points 3 days ago

This is exactly what will happen. Same thing with Albertsons and Kroger too.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 17 points 2 days ago

Sell it to me, I'll buy it for one dollar.

[-] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago

I'll go treefitty

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago

sell it to Microsoft so they can finally have a web browser that people use

[-] Liz@midwest.social 24 points 2 days ago

Yes, the anti-trust lawsuit should culminate in one part of a tech giant being sold to another tech giant.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Corigan@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Nah I rather they not get deeply vested in figuring out as revenue...

[-] 200ok@lemmy.world 60 points 3 days ago

If they're allowed to choose who they sell it to this won't change anything

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 50 points 3 days ago

I think they should sell it to me.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Bosht@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Just...please for the love of whatever diety do Microsoft. Fucking sick of their shit recently with One Drive.

[-] xylogx@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

Do you have a few minutes to learn about our lord and savior Linux?

[-] Bosht@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

Man the Linux propaganda is STRONG on Lemmy. I'll say what I've said before: I use my computer for gaming, web browsing, and managing a media server for my family that hosts pictures and other things. If those 3 things can be done easily without issue on a Linux distro without having to fuck around with configs every time I want to do something, I'm all in. By what I've heard though it's just not there yet. I am super happy Steam decided to go Linux for their Steamdeck though as I've heard thats helped make monumental strides the right direction. Trust me, I want to. Large part of it is I worked tech support for over a decade and having to troubleshoot my own shit is like the furthest thing I want to deal with haha

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 35 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

People wondering what Chrome has to do with a search monopoly:

The obvious benefit is that they can default the user's search provider to Google.

But the more nefarious benefit is that, by controlling both the client and server, they can unilaterally decide the future of web standards. They don't have to advocate for proposals, gain consensus, and limit themselves to well-supported standards the way other companies do. They can just do it, gain the first-mover advantage, and force others to follow suit.

If they don't like HTTP/2, they can invent their own protocol and implement it for their search servers and Chrome. Suddenly, using Chrome with Google Search is way faster than using Chrome with Bing or using Firefox with Google Search. Even if Microsoft and Mozilla don't like the protocol, they now have to adopt it or fall behind.

This has happened. QUIC was deployed in 2012. Firefox gained support in 2021.

They're doing the same thing with Privacy Sandbox, and you can also look at browser feature compatibility tables to see how eager Google is to force their own interpretation of every not-yet-finalized web standard as the canonical interpretation.

Edit: Also, JPEG XL vs. WebP.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago

They should force it to become a worker cooperative. It's the only solution that doesn't allow for corruption

load more comments (5 replies)

Step 1: Buy Chome

Step 2: End development

Step 3: ???

Step 4: ~~Profit?~~ Non-Profit Firefox?

[-] disconnectikacio@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

They should force google to kick sundar, the harmful thing, what made all google software, and services shit since it is the ceo...

[-] bitwaba@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

If you think Sundar is bad, just wait to see who Wall Street picks to replace him.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
701 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59598 readers
2981 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS