446
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 7 hours ago

This implies that Linux is rising but still worse than the worst windows os 🫣🫠🫤😴🤧🤮🥴

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I liked Vista (I was never a RAM peasant & I liked the glass theme) and hated XP.

I was also always sad how Me was brutally sodomised by shitty third party drivers (who just renamed 98 drives).

I considered W8 and 11 just as mediocre moneygrabs or maybe a marketing stunt.

[-] Fosheze@lemmy.world 173 points 10 hours ago

Win 10 was definitely an improvement over 8. I'd even argue that 10 as it started out was the best since xp. Of course now 10 has been fully enshitified but it used to be good.

[-] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 hours ago

I'd even argue that 10 as it started out was the best since xp

How can you so batantly skip over Win 7? I've heard some argue 10 was better (it wasn't) but that 7 >> XP was pretty undisputed.

All three are shit compared to Linux, of course (Arch btw).

[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 30 points 9 hours ago

I would agree that 10 was very good, but i could say similar things about windows 11 which in many ways performs better then 10.

And yet its shortly after upgrading to 11 that i switched to linux to never look back.

I think part of the logic in this meme is that it doesn’t matter how good the basic functions of the operating system are but what does is the design philosophy of the company. Loyalty in other systems decreased while Loyalty in windows gained.

Microsoft force feeding edge, onedrive, burrying the local account option till after the install with Microsoft account.

Randomly finding an update put a second weather widget on my taskbar that shows a different weather then the one in start. Taskbar icons that cant be closed, only hidden.

These things don't affect the OS functionality in a big deal but its like i was in an abusive relationship that i finally got out of. No matter how much sweet talking and promises to do better i am not going back.

[-] psvrh@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 hours ago

8 wasn't nearly as bad as people think, and there were big improvements to the kernel that make it a definite improvement over 7.

The problem for most people was the Start screen, which if you could get past, left you with what was a really good OS.

Less ads and telemetry than 10, too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Windows Vista was better than 8 and 10, a lot of legacy devices in industry kept extended Vista support for years and years.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 2 points 4 hours ago

Yes, this is my experience also, it was stable and only a few (at the time) legacy bs didn't work out of the box.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 1 points 4 hours ago

Charting is ops passion!!

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 hours ago

Having used both, Windows Vista was much worse than windows 8.

[-] youngalfred@lemm.ee 37 points 9 hours ago

Vista wasn't that bad. The dodgy selling it on computers that couldn't handle it was an issue (much like they still do with selling laptops with only 32gb storage).

I still think it was one of the nicest looking - black taskbar with the start button sticking up, sidebar widgets, aero glass etc

[-] GiveOver@feddit.uk 21 points 8 hours ago

It was never stable for me. I remember I had a laptop that would always refuse to shut down because "shutdown.exe" was running

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I wonder if that was actually malware.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] psvrh@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 hours ago

You're absolutely right about this. 7 is basically a Vista service pack that got rebranded.

All of the "good stuff" people credit 7 with came in Vista.

[-] AspieEgg 3 points 6 hours ago

I think some of the biggest complaints about Vista were its poor driver support and over-active UAC. You couldn’t hardly do anything on the computer without UAC bugging you for permission when Vista first came out.

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 7 hours ago

I remember the hardware situation being very fucked, due to driver authors not updating their shit in time and people trying to get their older stuff working which worked fine under XP, but was incompatible with Vista's new driver model. It took a couple years until the release of 7 for most of those issues to get ironed out.

[-] asudox@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Windows has commited a sin()

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 18 points 9 hours ago
[-] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago

Linux on the other hand gained a lot of exp()

[-] De_Narm@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago

The colouring is shit, MacOS turns red at its peak. So, was it good or bad at that moment?

[-] y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago

Made in China moment.

Red is good in the east, green is bad.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] zante@slrpnk.net 17 points 10 hours ago
[-] smeg@feddit.uk 6 points 7 hours ago

Yeah, I'd say it's the ~~best~~ least horrible it's ever been

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Gladaed@feddit.org 14 points 10 hours ago

Windows and even Mac are clearly superior. As shown in the graph eventhough Linux is getting better it never even got close.

[-] abfarid@startrek.website 3 points 6 hours ago

I think the way you worded it doesn't make it obvious that you're criticizing the graph specifically and not the os, hence your downvotes. But yes, that graph is absolute mess.

[-] Gladaed@feddit.org 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

That wink was somewhat intended ;) The graphs are the intended primary meaning, but Linux usability has actually been complicated in the past.

I.e. I was unable to get a crappy 300$ Laptop running with Linux as a student (ca. 2016) to be used as a youtube/Netflix machine. But that is way in the past. It worked barely when using Windows and I had the hope to prolong its life with Linux. There were some complicated graphic driver issues.

[-] smeg@feddit.uk 3 points 7 hours ago

Wasn't 98 the precursor to ME? I thought 2000 was the server version (or something like that)?

[-] AspieEgg 9 points 6 hours ago

Windows 2000 sold as both a server OS and a workstation OS, but there was no home edition of 2000. There was also no professional version of Me. It would probably be more accurate to say there were two separate paths of evolution that converged with XP.

NT -> 2000 -> XP
98 -> ME -> XP

Though, XP is built off of the NT kernel, so you could also argue that the 9X line ended with ME.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

OP wasn't yet born in the late second millennium, they didn't suffer through monthly reinstalls.

/j!!

But yes, for home users NT Windows came with XP.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 5 points 7 hours ago

Yep. In the beginning there were two threads of Windows garbage: Win NT (for companies, with NT kernel) and (MSDOS-based) Win 9x for peasants. Win 2000 was the "last" Win NT and Win Me was the last Win 9x.

That's not 100% true as Me used something called "Real mode DOS" which limited the OS interactions with DOS and Windows XP was an evolution of the NT kernel, and all subsequent windowses come from that kernel (Vista, 7, 8, etc.. and the Server variants).

Win Me was the "Mistake Edition" because it was half-baked, most of Microsoft was focusing by then on the next iteration of NT and they even didn't ship to developers the Me version but rather Windows 2000.

And probably Windows Me was on the knowing about 9/11:

"System Restore suffered from a bug in the date-stamping functionality that could cause System Restore to incorrectly date-stamp snapshots that were taken after September 8, 2001. This could prevent System Restore from locating these snapshots and cause the system restore process to fail. Microsoft released an update to fix this problem."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
446 points (100.0% liked)

linuxmemes

21340 readers
1281 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS