49
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 17 points 1 day ago

This is sorta funny for me because as a non cs major who went into it it seems like all the api's I work with are called rest apis and I was always wondering what a non rest api would be.

[-] macroplastic@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago

SOAP, which is basically dead, or GraphQL.

[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Hahaha, don't underestimate jank ass vendor systems. My workplace has at least one business critical thing using SOAP. We've been spinning our wheels on deprecating the damn thing for three years.

[-] macroplastic@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Lol, I probably should have said "legacy". Would hope no one is writing new SOAP APIs in 2024!

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 1 day ago

see. now I have seen references to soap but never really got that to. when it comes down to it my biggest concern is things just work.

[-] vzq@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

This is all very “old man yells at cloud”.

Interesting historical note, but things change.

[-] Dunstabzugshaubitze@feddit.org 25 points 1 day ago

I'd Agree in most cases, but not in this one.

Rigor in definitions allows us to express a lot of complex things in a compact form. this allows us to treat "Cars" as something different than "Motorcycles" while both a motorized vehicles.

the same is true for REST-API and other API-Types, while all of them are just a means to allow services to exchange data, they tell us a lot about how this exchange happens and what to expect, but only if we use the words in a way that they represent the concept they were meant to represent. Otherwise we end up with meaningless buzz words like "rest", "agile", "scrum", "artificial intelligence" and so forth, instead of meaningful terms found in the jargon of other engineering disciplines like "magnetism", "gravity" or "motor".

[-] frezik@midwest.social 19 points 1 day ago

We're well past that. I would probably care more if the original idea behind REST solved a real problem, but it doesn't. It's architecture astronaut stuff.

If REST is just about using HTTP verbs and status codes smarter, and sending the payload in JSON, I'm good to leave it at that. It's useful.

[-] vzq@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Besides, the original definition is not reflective of real world needs - which is why it’s morphed to something else.

[-] sushibowl@feddit.nl 7 points 1 day ago

Rigor in definitions allows us to express a lot of complex things in a compact form. this allows us to treat "Cars" as something different than "Motorcycles" while both a motorized vehicles.

Meh. There's plenty of room in the gray zone between "car" and "motorcycle" where things like this or this can exist. The botanical world has worked very hard to create rigorous definitions of fruits and vegetables only to be completely ignored by cooks. The culinary world in general has done just fine for centuries without rigorously specifying whether taco's are sandwiches and cereal is a soup.

As long as it is generally understood what people mean by a word when they use it everything will be mostly fine. REST is an understood term, whether the inventor of the term meant something else by it is immaterial.

[-] Dunstabzugshaubitze@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

my problem is not with words changing there meaning its with words losing meaning.

rest api today means any api ontop of http where response bodies are json, but nothing more, we can't get much more general when talking about web apis than that, "rest" is almost meaningless and we don't have a new word describing APIs that adhere to the constraints of what restful meant, but those are a useful tool for building web applications that can easily be used by a web browser. no matter if you like fielding-rest-style-apis or not, you lost the ability to call them by a name and gained murky mumbo jumbo for it.

[-] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

I'm my observation, as a nearly-30-year-vet in the field, it's due to the same factors as always. The technology doesn't enforce the standard. So people do any fucking thing they want because they honestly don't know any better.

I'm working on an app right now. On one of the controllers there is a single endpoint, out of about 30 (which should fucking tell you something right there) that conforms to restful standards. Every single other one of them is wrong. Because folks didn't know better and leaders didn't lead/teach/know any better themselves.

[-] Slotos@feddit.nl 6 points 1 day ago

A cargo cult doesn’t change airplanes by building mock runways - they rather miss the point entirely.

this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
49 points (100.0% liked)

Programming

17476 readers
173 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS