1122
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago

Identity politics, and the concern silos that come with them, have failed. It's my personal opinion that they were pushed as a means to divide us against each other over things that don't threaten the profits of the capitalist class.

Fight for human rights.

Yes, human rights includes LGBT+ rights.

Yes, human rights includes women's rights.

Human rights at work as well. Human rights to housing and Healthcare. No half measures, no negotiations.

We tried to negotiate with the 1% in the early 20th century. Much like negotiating peace with Putin, it was just a temporary cease fire while the 1% consolidated their power and let their propaganda networks soak the human mind.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Class warfare

[-] NeoToasty@kbin.melroy.org 16 points 1 day ago

I would put literacy right in front because apparently there's a disturbing amount of people who don't know what words mean almost.

To understand anything, you need a sense of literacy.

[-] FlyingSpaceCow@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

21% of American adults are illiterate (54% read below a 6th grade level)

17% of Canadian adults are illiterate.

I keep coming back to these points as it's important context when understanding the news.

[-] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 1 points 12 hours ago

Because there are still a lot of old folks around from when education was… not so well enforced

[-] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago

That's... horrifying. I had no idea it was that high. I have to wonder how anyone can be illiterate, after watching my kids learn to read, and how little effort it took (on my part I mean, they were putting effort into it, because they wanted to)

[-] FlyingSpaceCow@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

I should point out that a portion of the stat comes from immigrants who are fully literate in their native language.

National literacy as a topic forms an interesting picture that I don't fully understand.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago

Yeah the data is kinda fucky cause of that, this has always been a factor too one of my ancestors spoke decent English but could only read and write in German he was considered technically illiterate.

[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It looks to me like it's ordered from more progressive to more fundamental, so literacy should be the last one, really. Trans rights is the newest major one, so it's the first to fall.

[-] maplebar@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

I believe in free speech but I'm more concerned about freedom from religion than freedom of religion.

Democratic secular society is on a sharp decline all over the world.

[-] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 5 points 1 day ago

Although you don't like religion, it's one of the dominos that fall in the line of authoritarian control. When it falls, other dominos fall with it.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

If we are to (correctly) have freedom of religion, the working class must remain armed to put down the religious' inevitable grasp at taking over the nation state.

These people are mentally ill, and work tirelessly to make their delusions your reality.

Source: your reality

[-] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

If we are to (correctly) have freedom ~~of religion~~, the working class must remain armed ~~to put down the religious' inevitable grasp at taking over the nation state~~.

Edit: I'm not disagreeing with your details, I'm just simplifying.

[-] maplebar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Religion has been used for millennia as a mechanism for authoritarian control.

Like I said, I support free thought and speech. Be religious if you must buy into a cult of mass delusion. But true freedom means freedom from religious law in a secular and democratic society.

[-] Siegfried@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

How is this a meme?

[-] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

We need to regroup. Anyone who cares for the above needs to join the same movement. Put your personal feelings aside and stand together, it's the only chance we've got to stop everything from unraveling.

[-] PagingDoctorLove@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago
[-] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

We need our grassroots organizations to collaborate more and we need people to move towards those organizations. That's how I see it anyways. It's not going to be easy, a lot of these organizations are slow moving due to their financial burdens and lack of general support, but there's more urgency now than ever.

[-] shasta@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

i don't understand the secondary text on those past rights. What are they supposed to represent? I can't even read any past Free Love

[-] taipan@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago
  1. Trans rights
  2. Gay rights, Freedom of expression
  3. Women's rights, Free love
  4. Free speech, Democracy
  5. Freedom of religion, Modernity
  6. Literacy
[-] SARGE@startrek.website 138 points 2 days ago

This implies it's falling on its own.

There should be a mass of red hats trying to push it over.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 116 points 2 days ago

“But Trump said he’d magically make eggs cheaper!!!!11!!”

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 7 points 1 day ago

Entenmann's donuts were buy one get one free right after the election. Bless Trump for turning donuts to twice as many just by thought alone!

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 55 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Call me radical if you want but, I don't think Subject A of our cause should be rights for a minority of our citizenry.

Those rights should be unspoken truths we uphold regardless.

The common man will walk by TRANS RIGHTS 4000 times before they walk by UNION STRIKE.

The left needs to go back to focusing on workers, unions, labor, taxes, fairness and sense. Trans rights are important, and topical, but I feel the sjw yelling pushes a lot of people away from what our side of politics is actually about.

There isn't a single person I work with that wouldn't toss a flier with 'trans rights' written on it in the trash the second it was handed to them.

[-] Antiproton@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago

You could not have missed the point harder

[-] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

I'm taking points by consensus. Luckily, Lemmy has those built in and the congregation ain't with you, dog.

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah but the point is that if they hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominos will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate.

It's easier to ramp up an authoritarian regime if you start off bullying a group that's small and easy to marginalized. Then you work your way up from there.

What you're saying is like "All lives matter" compared to "Black lives matter". The point of BLM wasn't that Black lives are more important, per se, but that they need more attention right now.

Like if you've got two kids, and one scrapes his knee, and the other cracks his head open...obviously (hopefully) you love both of your kids, but one of them is clearly in more need of immediate attention. They matter more right now, in the current context.

[-] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

What do you think of Sanders, he has spoken out in the past about how putting identity politics with regards to gender, race, etc ahead of economic issues isn't helping Democrats. That doesn't mean he's not staunchly in favor of supporting rights for those minorities though. Are you coming down on that side of the issue or are you saying eliminating the hard line on rights for minorities of all sorts as a party position/talking point would be favorable, and then once in power maybe resume supporting them?

Do you think Republicans using trans rights/bathroom bills as a wedge issue was effective in the last decade? There is something to be said for putting your best foot forward, using your most widely popular policies to run on being a strong winning strategy but I'm not sure how I feel about it. Is this another example of the new "when they go low, we go low" thought that's happening this week? Yeah weird times all around, my trans friends are looking a little scared.

I am someone who wouldn't give "T people" rights the time of day. It's absurd. If they're American, and a legal citizen, then they have the same rights as me. I don't have the time or patience to focus on a group that makes up a fraction of a fraction of a percent of the population. We have real problems.

[-] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

I think you've misinterpreted the picture. These are supposed to be domino bricks. "trans rights" isn't the first brick because it is the most important - it's the first brick because it's the first that's going to fall.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 47 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I see your point but when basic human rights of a minority group are threatened, there is a moral imperative to organize to protect them, regardless of their popularity. There’s really no way around it. I think a framing that includes trans rights as only one aspect of a larger struggle for human freedom and dignity is the best strategy. Because there will need to be some discussion of trans rights if fascists continue to attack them. The alternative is to abandon a part of our community to violent oppression, which to me is unthinkable.

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 21 points 2 days ago

that’s the importance of countermessaging. harris and walz had it right for 0.0076ms with their “weird” direction, like “look how fucking weird jd vance is for wanting to do genital inspections on every kid in order to make life harder for like 40 kids nationwide, what a freak!?!” and even some conservatives were like “yeah that’s a little far we don’t need to be doing all that.” that was a really successful strategy that had great potential.

…and then they dropped that like a month before the election in favor of courting suburban conservatives. from “weird” to “follow the law.”

[-] 7toed@midwest.social 6 points 1 day ago

Sorry now every time I see someone mentioning the "weird to follow the weird laws" pipeline I get unduly agitated at how fucking hard the DNC dropped the ball this cycle. Now I'm more than surprised as ever that Hilary won the popular vote with campaign managers like these.

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 day ago

literally no need to apologize! it’s absolutely fucked

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 75 points 2 days ago

If you don't stand for the rights of others, there'll be nobody left to stand for your's - so get standing!

[-] MellowYellow13@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

As well as lack of affordable or even free healthcare, lack of affordable housing, lack of vacation time, lack of decent pay, lack of maternity and paternity time, lack of affordable healthy food.

It is really becoming lack of anything and everything. The only thing that has rights in this country are guns and vehicles.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
1122 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5473 readers
2472 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS