971
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by lwadmin@lemmy.world to c/lemmyworld@lemmy.world

Earlier, after review, we blocked and removed several communities that were providing assistance to access copyrighted/pirated material, which is currently not allowed per Rule #1 of our Code of Conduct. The communities that were removed due to this decision were:

We took this action to protect lemmy.world, lemmy.world's users, and lemmy.world staff as the material posted in those communities could be problematic for us, because of potential legal issues around copyrighted material and services that provide access to or assistance in obtaining it.

This decision is about liability and does not mean we are otherwise hostile to any of these communities or their users. As the Lemmyverse grows and instances get big, precautions may happen. We will keep monitoring the situation closely, and if in the future we deem it safe, we would gladly reallow these communities.

The discussions that have happened in various threads on Lemmy make it very clear that removing the communites before we announced our intent to remove them is not the level of transparency the community expects, and that as stewards of this community we need to be extremely transparent before we do this again in the future as well as make sure that we get feedback around what the planned changes are, because lemmy.world is yours as much as it is ours.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] theDIESEL999@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago

This is a bit concerningโ€ฆ why is Lemmy censoring things that not even Reddit is censoring? This seems like a bleak warning for the future of the platform. I understand censoring illegal content, but if nothing is hosted on Lemmy, then whatโ€™s the problem?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mneasi@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago

Ahhhh right, we are now one step closer to become the new redditโ€ฆ

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] 80085@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago

Seems overly cautious, or lemmy.world is trying to find excuses to cut off content they don't like. Legal trouble for allowing access to those communities, which aren't even based on lemmy.world, would be so much of an overstep, they'd probably be able to get free legal counsel from the EFF or a similar organization.

Anyways, this will be my last post on this server. Even though I don't use any of those communities, I don't want to have to constantly monitor what has been banned to see what I may miss out on.

Apparently, lemmy.world also removed c/shrooms, which I didn't even know about. And again, risk of legal trouble for that would be extremely low.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ivyy_LemmyW@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago

This is why Lemmy won't grow, a lot of instances are forcing their users to create another account on other instances, this was my third account due to the blocking of some instances like this...

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] talos@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago

I can understand this. This is a server hosted by an individual who doesn't want the potential legal headaches that may arise. Everyone is free to make another account on another instance, or create their own instance.

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago

I'm no fan of piracy - just seems like a pretty name for petty theft to me - but this decision seems problematic. I went and read some of the threads about this decision on some of the other communities, including dbzer0, and I looked around the blocked communities on an alt account.

I'm not seeing evidence of actual copyrighted material posted, just discussions about how to steal content, which itself isn't illegal. And there's a pretty fair amount of content - the communities are active - so if there was a violation I feel like it should be handled as the exception it appears to be. Those communities themselves don't allow posting of copyrighted content, so it shouldn't be a problem to get a violation removed. If someone posted an image that contained child pornography to one of the NSFW communities, would we block the whole community, or just get that post removed (and alert the authorities)? The latter, I hope.

They also make a good case that the action was taken in response to a troll on a newly-created account who didn't provide any evidence of there being copyrighted material. That in itself seems like a problem, though maybe someone looked into it? I'm pretty supportive of the .World admins, I think you're doing a good job in a difficult situation, but I believe these communities should be unblocked unless there is an actual problem.

[-] atlasraven31@lemm.ee 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yarr harr, tis incorrect sez me

Theft be taking somefing, I has it and you don't

You savu?

Copying be making another thing from a thing

load more comments (27 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] xyzinferno@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago

I wish people would be more mature about their reaction to this, as well as other people's reactions, regardless of whether they agree or disagree with the choice.

I'm not opposed to piracy, though I understand the risks that come with a platform allowing potentially pirated content. While I respect the decision and see the reasoning behind it, I don't agree with it, and will likely change my home instance to one that allows me to continue communicating with those communities, as I was subscribed to one of them.

I'll still be participating in communities hosted here, and I hope that with this decision, the admins' concern about being potentially sued is substantially alleviated.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] vsp@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago

It's a tough decision.

There's a target on the collective back of Lemmy, its developers and this instance. Rooting out these issues early is part of it. One of my first recommendations to @ruud@lemmy.world was to start putting aside contribution dollars from donors for a legal fund to manage liabilities like this. This decision is just solid management and avoiding issues well ahead of time.

I wish the admins well. And for those who have had their communities 'snipped' from being connected to Lemmy.world, I hear you. It's hard when you have built a connection and a sense of self on a platform, and then it becomes severed. That's hard.

[-] brutallyhonestcritic@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿฟ๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿฟ BOO! ๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿฟ๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿฟ

๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿฟ๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿฟ BOO! ๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿฟ๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿฟ

๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿฟ๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿฟ BOO! ๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿฟ๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿฟ

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Lummy@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

Goodbye yโ€™all Iโ€™m out

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] harry_assman@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago

QQ: Have there been other communities removed and was it communicated?

I have just realized that c/Shrooms has been banned too, but I cannot find a statement regarding this particular ban.

Are or will there be more bans? I am not asking to complain about it or make remarks about which the decision is correct to me or not, but rather point out the lack of communication or unfortunate communication.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Aurix@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

I am strongly opposed to the way this is handled. Discussing piracy may not be censored in any way and being afraid of shady lawsuits is not good, this is one of the main responsibilities of a server admin of such a grand operation. Especially so for what is effectively an image board which is grey zoning on copyright all the time. It is fine to ban communities who direct link to well known piracy sites, both because of the legal and perhaps ethical complications this brings.

We need now more than ever platforms where we defend basic freedoms as discussion of hot topics. I view the negative impact of this as banning discussion on drugs. Disclaimers about dangers and help lines for addiction should be forced, as the banning of purchase options, however please stay out of experiences, discussions and warnings on them.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

The copyblight strikes again.

This decision was the logical one, however, it was only rendered logical because of the awful state of copyright law.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] WereCat@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

I do understand that you would remove them if they were also hosted here... But they are hosted on other instances so I don't understand the issue? Is linking to that specific instance via comment the same issue as if they were visible for everyone on this instance? Or even mentioning it now in the OP like it is?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] JBloodthorn@kbin.social 45 points 1 year ago

Well that was a stupid thing to do.

[-] systemglitch@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

Unfortunate, but I understand the necessity of avoiding legal troubles as a volunteer group.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] deadinside91@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

While I wish there was more transparency about this decision before action was taken, in this case it's kind of understandable due to the servers being hosted in Germany and them having really draconian piracy laws. Just hoping that this won't lead to a chain reaction of other communities being removed due to legal complaints.

In the meantime, happy to get my piracy content over at db0.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] alldreadme@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

I kinda do understand their stance, it sucks but its better than having to deal with legal shit.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] WraithGear@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I donโ€™t think this was the right call. Donโ€™t have it hosted on here, fine. But defederated? I donโ€™t see how being federated would be an issue at all. Oh well guess i got to actively go seek them out now.

At this rate, you might as well as defederate from all instances. Cant be too careful.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] eleitl@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

Time to get serious about running my own instance. I now have to wonder what kind of political opinion I might voice which could make the instance operators liable. This is not tolerable long-term.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] Donger@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

I can't believe you've done this.

[-] SnowMeowXP@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

Just to put my two cents: Thanks for the good work. Continue keeping up to make sure lemmy.world wonโ€™t be liable in any way for possible issues.

I did not know you can defederate from specific communities. I thought it can be done only to instances.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ
this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
971 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29211 readers
72 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news ๐Ÿ˜

Outages ๐Ÿ”ฅ

https://status.lemmy.world

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations ๐Ÿ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS