155

Summary

The US’s approval for Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied ATACMS missiles, capable of striking targets nearly 200 miles away, marks a significant escalation in Ukraine’s ability to retaliate against Russian aggression.

The move, coming after intense lobbying by Kyiv, allows Ukraine to target Russian positions with more precision and destruction than prior weapons.

Russia has condemned the decision as a provocation risking world war.

Analysts suggest the policy shift, reportedly limited to Russia’s Kursk region, aligns with U.S. efforts to support Ukraine without triggering broader conflict.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] superkret@feddit.org 3 points 23 minutes ago

It's already a world war.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

It is unclear how if these are US operated missiles, and authorization was for Kursk region, how they all got fired at Bryansk.

[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Russia has been rattling the World War saber for so long that it's lost all meaning. It's like they're copying North Korea's homework when it comes to international threats.

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 30 points 14 hours ago

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine could lead to world war.

[-] Shanedino@lemmy.world 18 points 14 hours ago

Hur dur us invading a country unprovoked isn't to blame.

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 14 points 15 hours ago

Make no mistake, we were headed there anyway.

Sadly with great orange Hitler in charge we're probably going to be the axis powers this time along with Putin and Winnie the Pooh and the rest of the world doesn't stand a chance because we have all the bombs.

[-] MisterLister@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago

I doubt the US is going to play an active role in that new Axis, no matter how much taintlicking Trump does... I think it's more likely we are simply declawed mostly due to a sudden internal focus shift (attempting to reroute the military to purge "illegals" and whatever other civil strife ensues as a result), leading to an effective breakdown of global presence and influence.

Once Trump takes office, the US is pretty much guaranteed to no longer be a global superpower. Maybe not overnight, but the damage done will take generations to fix and that's probably the real goal here... not to make the US join hands with them, but to entirely neutralize us as a potential threat or obstacle. We might still have all the bombs, but what use are they when our incoming government is more likely to use them on our own cities or be paralyzed with infighting about maybe not using them on our own cities?

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

Counterpoint: the military attack on illegals is a first step. An attempt to put the blame for all of our country's ills onto a specific class or ethnicity. This is exactly what Hitler did with the Jews. The next step would be to make a play to convince the populace that annexing another country would be an effective solution to cure the problems of the nation.

The fat orange fuck has literally bragged about reading Mein Kampf. He's reading from Hitler's playbook and using it as an instruction manual.

[-] tiefling 37 points 18 hours ago

Russia could easily avoid a world war by pulling out of Ukraine and paying them to rebuild

[-] socsa@piefed.social 32 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

World War against who? You have nukes and a bunch of conventional forces which can't even beat Ukraine. If you have a suicide wish then fucking get it over with already and stop jerking us around

[-] NecroParagon@lemm.ee 7 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

To be fair to them, there's not a ton of militaries that could beat Ukraine. They're pretty cracked. Gotta give them that, they're some of the best fighters we've seen in a very long time.

Except when it comes to retreating effectively. They suck at that part.

[-] Mammothmothman@lemmy.ca 1 points 16 hours ago

Its not called Russian roulette for no reason.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago

Fucking bring it.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 12 points 18 hours ago
[-] StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 14 hours ago

That Putin has threatened to end the world? It’s in the 20’s at least, but I lost count a while ago.

Part of me wishes he’d go ahead and pull the pin. Dealing with the consequences would probably distract Trump and his cronies for his entire term and would reduce the head count of his supporters, giving the sane folks in the US a chance to regroup.

[-] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 40 points 1 day ago

In other words russias invasion of ukraine could cause a world war. Its not the ukrainians who decided to fuck around with russians.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

it 100% is US backed Ukrainians that provoked the war.

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago
[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 2 points 46 minutes ago

Ah yes, tell us more about how Russia's sudden invasion and annexization of Crimea following Euromaidan was the fault of US backed Ukrainians.

Best case, you're going to blame this on the fact that native Ukrainians staged a revolution to remove their corrupt president that was trying to buddy up with the sovereign that has been abusing and betraying them since 1941. To which I say, good for them. The annexation of Crimea came during the power vacuum following that when Putin saw that his ~~good buddy~~ sycophant Yanukovych had been removed by a hostile electorate. Putin saw his slaves trying to make a break for freedom and decided to bring his fist down on it.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 26 minutes ago

Any suggestion that Crimea doesn't prefer being in Russian Federation compared to under nazi rule committed to destroying them is delusional propaganda. Crimea was transferred to Ukraine in late 1950s. No one there had to bother learning Ukrainian language and little Ukrainian emigration occurred there.

[-] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 141 points 1 day ago

The commencement of whining about how the victim defending themselves is horribly unfair, unreasonable, and must be stopped at all costs, is always a feature of bullying. I don’t know why, but it is.

[-] Carvex@lemmy.world 66 points 1 day ago

When the bullied shows up with a gun, the bully suddenly tries peace.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 85 points 1 day ago

Putin could end this at any moment, by withdrawing.

[-] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

He never pulls out. Ask Trump.

[-] Paddzr@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

He's still pushing that limb rope...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 70 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Russia brought another country in to fight. Full stop. Theatrics.

And I think it’s likely. And it’s their fault.

Edit: We lose too, btw. Head in the clouds, cocks in our hands, and then everyone is going to wonder why the power went out and the taps went dry on day one.

I swear half the US wants it because they think they’ll wipe the floor gg and go back to drinking.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 49 points 1 day ago

For any of this to lead to "world war" one of two things has to happen:

  1. The US directly enters the war on the side of Ukraine - If this didn't happen at any point in the last two years, it's not suddenly going to happen now. And it's not more likely to happen because the US "provokes" Russia, so it's irrelevant anyway.

  2. Russia directly attacks a NATO country - Why would Russia ever do this? They can't even defeat a NATO aligned independent nation. How the fuck would they ever have a hope in hell of defeating all of NATO? In what possible way would they benefit from escalating the war?

Russia claiming that American "provocations" will lead to world war is meaningless because the reality is that for them to be "provoked" into starting a war they would have to be provoked into voluntarily deleting their entire country.

No matter how badly this hypothetical world war 3 goes for anyone else, even if - no, especially if - it becomes a total nuclear war, the one guarantee is that Russia loses. And they lose hard. Putin's best case scenario here is great he Hitler's himself in a bunker in a few years and that's if he's lucky.

So unless Putin and every single person in his orbit have joined a suicide cult and are already cooking up a big old bowl of spicy Kool-Aid, there is no reason whatsoever to take these claims seriously.

[-] A_Filthy_Weeaboo@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Serious question:

What about China and Xi Jinping? North Korea has already thrown they're very flimsy and small hat into the ring...barely, but they did send troops.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 13 points 18 hours ago

What about them? Suppose China sends 100,000 troops to Ukraine? How does that expand the conflict in any way?

This is the problem with people just buying this Russian line about America "escalating" the conflict. Increasing the scale or intensity of the conflict in Ukraine has zero bearing on its scope. China entering the war doesn't force America, or any other NATO country, to suddenly become involved.

It doesn't matter if China sends a million troops. Ten million. At the end of the day the conflict is still between Ukraine, Russia, and Russia's co-beligerants. Even if Ukraine somehow ended up invading China, this still doesn't directly involvre NATO in the war.

The only thing that can possibly involve NATO is either NATO choosing to get directly involved, or some opposing party directly attacking NATO. And none of those opposing parties have anything to gain by attacking NATO. So why would they?

[-] A_Filthy_Weeaboo@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

Thanks for the detailed answer, appreciate it!

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago

Sorry if I seem like I'm getting a little bent out of shape about this stuff. It frustrates me because Russian propaganda in this area has been far, far more successful than it has any right to be. It's extremely easy to see through once you sit back and examine the basic mechanics of the situation, but I understand that that's difficult to do when being faced with something as terrifying as the threat of a global conflict.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago

In less than two months, Putin will control the US military.

[-] cobysev@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

I'm so glad I just retired from the US military. I'd hate to be serving while that dictator asshole comes back. I was still serving the first time he took office and it was bad times for us. We were able to push back on his more extreme demands of the military, but we don't have a Democrat-controlled govt to keep him in check this time around.

[-] _stranger_@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

More importantly, we don't have any morally upstanding senators with the balls to hold the fucking Republicans in line. Even McCain had to find out he was dying of brain cancer before he stood against the machine to defend the right to healthcare.

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but there aren't any Republicans left that will do that.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 44 minutes ago

They would need 4, but Murkowski, Collins is 2. There is plenty of money to bribe republicans to favour Pharma, or agriculture sustainability (deportations), though I'm not sure if congress can "stop" a declaration of national emergency martial law.

Mitt might, but it's not a guarantee.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

You mean John Curtis, the guy who's taking Mittens' seat? I have my doubts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] x00z@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Lmao. Imagine if North Korea would tell Putler that he is not allowed to use their soldiers for offense.

Russia should have been thankful there were restrictions on the weapons Ukraine received.

It's such a baby move.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 day ago

Russian Officials say a lot of things

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

I'm kind of hopeful, actually, that the fact that they are publically whining so much about escalating to a world war is an indication that they don't have the means to do so, short of going Nuclear, and I think even Putin realizes how that will end up.

I mean, he is already bringing in foreign fighters. isn't that a concession that Russian fighters can't do the job in Ukraine themselves? If they had the means to escalate while still fighting in Ukraine, they wouldn't whine about it, they would just do it.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago

What's extra sickening to me, is that this cat has no trouble operating under the assumption that his own life, and power, and glory, are worth these unending untold thousands of other lives, when in actuality his life is worth less than any one of these soldiers'.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 40 minutes ago

I'm not even sure they can go nuclear. Nukes are expensive to maintain, and Putin buddies have been embezzling that money for a long time.

[-] FelixCress@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Newsflash: there is already a war. A one Russia can end tomorrow if they fuck off back into their borders.

[-] _stranger_@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago
[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Uh huh. Sure thing boss.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
155 points (100.0% liked)

News

23320 readers
3691 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS