92
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bcgm3@lemmy.world 14 points 2 hours ago

Just you wait...

  • 2024: Wicked (Part 1)
  • 2025: Wicked Part 2 (Part 1)
  • 2026: Wicked Part 2 (Part 2)
[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

Wow I didn't know they cut it in half. After the whole poster thing I wasn't super enthused to see the film, after all I thought the play did amazing job, now I'm even less enthused.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I really don't care anymore .... when a new movie is announced, I really don't care to do anything special to go out and see it. I just forget about it and wait a year or two and watch it as a stream on one of the services I already pay for.

It usually works out. If the movie was crap, everyone will tell me, I'll read about it or see low review scores for and just never bother watching it ever ..... or it's released on Netflix, Disney or Amazon and I watch it there a year or two later.

If it has great reviews and not available anywhere, then I just wait a year and rent it for $5 and watch it at home.

There's more than enough content to last a lifetime, I'm not spending any more money to watch the latest greatest movie as soon as it comes out.

[-] Whelks_chance@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

I was surprised when Dune did it, not sure why they hid it.

[-] makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Dune I can give a pass to because Frank Herbert originally wrote it as a trilogy and combined it into one book. It has pretty clear chunks breaking it up. They absolutely should have been better about advertising what it was, but it's hard to cover all that content succinctly

Wicked however is based off a 2 hour and 45 minute Broadway show with a 15 minute intermission. There is no good reason that a movie that can have tighter transistons, faster costume changes, and no reused cast should be longer than the Broadway show. Let alone twice as long and spread over multiple films

[-] keckbug@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Strictly speaking, the show is somewhat based on a series of novels. There’s an awful lot of story in those that is simply not present t in the musical, but could possibly have been included in the movie. I don’t know if that’s actually what happened, but there’s certainly a canon source for substantially more content.

[-] BowserBasher@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

From what I remember reading, yes there is some added content from the books that is not in the musical stage adaptation. I think it’s more of Elphaba’s childhood (which is quite a bit in the book).

Also remember reading that one of the reasons they decided to split it was because they couldn’t find a reasonable way to move on after “Defying Gravity” (This is the big number before intermission in the musical and really does feel like the end of that chapter) to the next scene in the film, so they decided to split the films too. Not saying it was the best way to go but maybe it means they can add more book related stuff to the second half too. The musical is sorely lacking there too.

[-] lolola 2 points 2 hours ago

Deathly Hallows

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 71 points 6 hours ago

Oh lord. This did not need to be a two parter. Man, I miss movies being well contained 90 minute stories.

[-] dditty@lemm.ee 57 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

The whole Broadway show can be done in a 2 hour-ish performance live, there is no justification to stretch this to two movies other than corporate greed milking every IP to the limit

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 4 points 4 hours ago

From everything I've seen so far about Wicked the movie(s), yes that's exactly what it is.

The show is still touring folks, go see the show if you can

[-] ME5SENGER_24@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago

Unless its a planned trilogy with 3 strong stories that could semi-standalone (short of context being lost without the other installments) then any movie that needs more than 2 hours should just be a mini series. You wanna tell a 4 hour long story about the Wizard of Oz? Fine, stick it on Netflix and anyone who wants to binge watch it can to make it “feel like a movie” and those who don’t will have 4 - hour long episodes.

[-] Flamekebab@piefed.social 7 points 6 hours ago

I'm starting to suspect that this is why I don't watch as many films as I'd like to. They've all become such a time commitment. Show me what you can do with an hour and a half!

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 30 points 6 hours ago

I’m still bitter about Spider-Man. Had no idea it was a part one until it ended. Maybe we just create whole movies with the 2+ hours we are using.

[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 hours ago

Ah fuck you reminded me of the ending of Spiderverse. Probably at least 2 years away still...

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

I don’t think they were even making part 2 when they ended it that way. Made it so much worse.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Which Spiderman was a part 1 of 2?

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

The second spider-verse movie, I think. No mention of it being a trilogy but the story clearly ended setting up a third movie.

[-] bassomitron@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

Those movies were already too long, IMO. The shortest of the two is 114 minutes. My son really liked them, but we had to break up each movie into more than one session.

[-] SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

2 hours is reasonable for a movie. It’s when it goes to three that it needs to be a really good movie.

[-] bassomitron@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

Oh I don't mind it as much; but, for an animated movie that's somewhat geared towards a wider age demographic range, it felt a bit too long for younger viewers.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Same, caught it on a plane and was pissed I had to keep sitting there not knowing the actual ending

[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 5 hours ago

This did have PART 1 early in reveal but then realized people wouldn't see it so they lied about this being a complete movie. Mission Impossible Dead Reckoning did the same thing

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

People aren't going to see a movie that lies about it being a part 1 either, at least not after the first weekend when the word gets out

[-] hopesdead@startrek.website 3 points 5 hours ago

I pretty sure it was public knowledge (even talked about in publicity) Dead Reckoning was two parts.

[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Yeah, they scrubbed it from the title once it was on digital/streaming for awhile.

Here’s what AppleTV looks like:

[-] burgersc12@mander.xyz 1 points 3 hours ago

I think this has more to do with the next one being the Final Reckoning instead of "dead reckoning part 2"

[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Well, that means they pivoted either way. Still strange, and still likely all about marketing and not wanting anything dissuading people from diving in.

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago

Damn, I planned on watching this too. No point now.

this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
92 points (100.0% liked)

Movies

7479 readers
193 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS