592
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 80 points 1 month ago

If Kamala was a garbage candidate, what does that make Trump?

For bonus points, how is it not the voters fault considering any rational answer to the above question? You may open your book to look up topical issues like peace, climate, genocide, rights, hate, juvenile bullying, criminal bullying, felony conviction, bigotry (don't miss misogyny relating to to "garbage candidate", see above), and tariffs.

[-] missingno@fedia.io 54 points 1 month ago

If Kamala was a garbage candidate, what does that make Trump?

The guy who told voters what they wanted to hear. "I know you're upset at the world, and I'm going to make it great again."

The best Kamala could do was "I won't do anything differently from the Biden administration."

[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago

The constant liar who told voters what they wanted to hear.

[-] missingno@fedia.io 33 points 1 month ago

You and I both know he's a con artist who won't fix anything. But when voters don't feel like the establishment is listening to them, that's when they become desperate enough to fall for a con artist. Because at least the con artist made them think there was hope.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 9 points 1 month ago

You can complain about that all you want, but the fact that Bitcoin is reaching new record highs tells me that your average person would rather be conned than be told the truth.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub 28 points 1 month ago

It is utterly wild to me that Biden had to withdraw from the race because he was so unpopular and the Harris team was like, let’s just tie ourselves as snugly to that man as possible. Real brain geniuses on that team. I just read she was relying on a ex uber exec. And it all made sense.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Turns out, lecturing the voters doesn't make them want to vote for you. Everything you said is correct, but those weren't the concerns that resonated. To quote Bill Clinton's strategist in 92, "it's the economy, stupid." Yeah, the economy is doing great right now, but you have to ask, "for who?"

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 23 points 1 month ago

If Kamala was a garbage candidate, what does that make Trump?

47th President of the USA?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Sergio@slrpnk.net 69 points 1 month ago

Unpopular opinion: Kamala was a solid candidate.

Biden was headed to a humiliating defeat. Another couple debates, and maybe he loses NY and CA and we have a Dukakis- or Mondale-level annhilation. Kamala stepped in and ran a solid campaign on very short notice. Trump didn't even have time to come up with a good nickname for her! She kicked his ass in their only debate, and he was literally too scared to do it again.

In the end, she lost by a couple hundred thousand votes in 3 states. She was wrong about Gaza and the economy, but PA, MI, and WI are credibly winnable in future elections. Kamala was not a garbage candidate.

[-] wpb@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

What was solid about her? She lost to Trump of all people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I hope you realize this but Harris ended up in a humiliating defeat.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] brianary@startrek.website 48 points 1 month ago

If voters bear no responsibility, do you really believe in democracy, or are you thinking about this as an issue to be solved by authority?

The self-righteousness of this discussion is a problem. Politics requires some humility, which we seem to be short of.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Little bit of A, lotta bit of B.

Trump was the most garbage candidate in every way in the history of our country.

He basically coasted to victory.

Double-standards for days.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] schema@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's kinda crazy to me that a sizable amount of people expect a perfect completely spotless candidate, or they don't vote and hand over the win to fascism.

In a rational world, Harris would have won without even doing a single rally, because the alternative is Trump and his cronies.

People generally don't realize that the only way to get an option to the left of the democrats is if Republicans no longer win elections. But with each "punishment", voters give the democrats, the Republicans' grip on power gets tighter and tighter, with more cronie judges, more gerrymandering, more voter purges, more ID rules, and more propaganda.

So, are the voters, or rather those who didn't vote, wrong? Fuck yes, for the reason that because of them, we now have Trump as the US president rather than him going to prison like he deserves. Of course they are wrong. How is that even a question?

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

People generally don't realize that the only way to get an option to the left of the democrats is if Republicans no longer win elections.

Absofuckinglutely wrong. The number of Democrats still buying this bullshit is astounding. THIS is why you lose so damn much.

No Democratic candidate has had more support from right leaning voters than Bernie Sanders in the last 30 years. Explain that with your model. It's not just about some smooth gradient from left to right and capturing the middle. We are in a populist age. The people are totally fed up with the status quo.

It's disruptors that win, not whomever captures the center of a spectrum that only policy wonks even care about. Anyone who's chief concern is left vs right is already a decided voter.

[-] schema@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Way to miss the point. Against Trump, it shouldn't matter who the other candidate is. A fucking bucket of snails could have been candidate and I'd vote for it over it over fascism.

this is why you lose so damn much

"This candidate isn't left enough for me. By not voting I essentially vote for fascism". That is why democrats lose.

Would a more left leaning candidate have more chances? Maybe? No matter what, should it have mattered if the alternative is Trump? Absolutelyfucking not, but apparently it does.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] LostMyRedditLogin@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Good luck with shaming people into voting for you. It didn't work in 2016 and it didn't work now. Letting the DNC off the hook won't change anything.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] wpb@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is maddening. It will never stop. The democrats refuse to campaign on progressive policies, which are incredibly popular among the entire electorate (yes, also among republicans, see the recent ballot measures in Missouri on paid sick leave and higher minimum wage, for example), instead opting to position themselves as "republican light". They completely capitulate to republican messaging on pretty much every issue (border wall, fracking, pro war, etc), and predictably lose to the people who invented this messaging. And then comes the worst part: angry libs start blaming the electorate instead of the people who lost. It's not the lack of the dems even mentioning universal health care, no it's the trans people. It's not the genocide that the current democratic regime is committing, no it's probably actually latino voters. It's not the fact that the Harris campaign asks us to pretend everything is hunky spunky with the economy, offering nothing to relieve the 80% of the population who live paycheck to paycheck. Noooo you know what it's actually white women and muslims faults. You fucking morons.

Can't wait for the 2026 anti-transgender dem ticket, and the anti gay marriage ticket in 2028. It's gonna be great.

[-] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

then comes the worst part: angry libs start blaming the electorate instead of the people who lost

I feel like even calling them "angry libs" gives them some measure of undeserved credibility. Let's call them "fucking crybaby closet fascists" because that's what they are.

Try some lefty moves or keep losing Dems.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 30 points 1 month ago

Perfection is the enemy of progress.

I can tell that many people in these comments have given up on every artistic skill they've ever tried to learn because their attempts were never good enough right out of the gate.

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

This, but unironically.

Trump was so bad that in a sane world a desiccated cat turd shoukd have beat him

The fact Harris lost doesn't mean shes a bad candidate, it means we don't live in a sane world.

[-] wpb@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Yeah I agree, it's the voters who are wrong. Can't wait to see how this strategy pans out next cycle!

[-] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Honestly, the voters voted in a way that made sense, given the information they had, which was either nothing - complete and utter lethargy, or a hyper-partisan distortion of reality reinforced by a multi-billion dollar propaganda industry backed by, among many others, the literally richest man on the planet in addition to an entire network of propaganda stations blasting disinformation 24/7. The voters being wrong is intentional and has been in the making for decades.

[-] wpb@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

They did vote in a way that makes sense. The Harris campaign offered nothing in the way of economic relief, while committing genocide. That's an insanely bad proposition. Stop blaming voters and look at your dogshit candidates.

[-] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Be honest: you claim that Harris offers no economic relief because you yourself never bothered to look up her actual policies and you've been told that she has none. It's wild to even compare anything she's proposed to Trump's economic policies and conclude that she offers the general populace less when all Trump has done is to massively shift wealth from the bottom to the top and will most likely continue to do just that.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Being right doesn’t automatically make you popular.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

Harris had concrete plans to tackle many, though not all, of the issues people actually care about. People voted for the man openly stating he will make those issues worse.

It's blatantly the fault of the voters. Until you people can get your heads out of your asses and join us in reality nothing will change.

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Truth. We definitely need to nominate better voters next cycle.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The voters aren’t wrong. It’s the non-voters that are wrong. Democracy should never be collateral for a protest..

EVER.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Who here actually votes in more local elections? Have you voted for the mayor or council members of your city? Sheriff? Literally any office lower than governor, senator or president of the entire country?

The top problem (garbage candidates) is literally caused by the bottom one (voters). There is garbage at the top, because nobody cares enough about the bottom.

Then again, it's not like Trump was ever a politician before running for president...

[-] NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I do vote in my local elections. I think the problem is actually too much money in politics. The oligarchs support and donate an infinite amount of money to campaigns. That leaves genuine candidates with nothing and little exposure.

I think we should severely limit how much they can donate to campaigns as well as having ranked choice voting, which can help people vote for candidates they like without "throwing" their vote away.

However, the democrats didn't put up kamala against others in a primary for us to vote for. She was simply selected. Moreover, the last time Bernie ran, the democratic party basically sabotaged him. There are deep issues that we need to solve.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DemBoSain@midwest.social 12 points 1 month ago

I am deep in MAGA country (Trump won this county with 70%). All of my local elections are single person.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

If the only reason you voted for trump as a form of ‘punishment’ towards dems, then yea that is on the voters. You should be voting for what helps you. Not to be a petty idiot.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

Cool, so, we'll see the voters in the primaries going forward, right? Unlike in 2016 and 2020, when they nominated said garbage candidates?

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Um...

the voters kinda did the nominating...

Edit: To clarify what I mean. People who voted in the Democratic primary didn't exactly vote for Biden, but voted for delegates that pledge to vote to Biden at the convention. Those delegates then can vote for who they think the people who voted for them would want when Biden dropped out. The delegates decided the voters would've wanted Harris since shes the VP, and that's probably what the voter would've want.

If you argue that Biden only won the 2024 nomination because of 2020. Well yea voters voted for him in 2020 too. 🤷‍♂️

People need to vote in primaries.

[-] Comrade_Spood@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago

That doesn't sound like a very democratic process to begin with cause all the power is in the delegates who can just choose whoever they want and not follow the desires of the voters. Which is how pretty much the whole system works to begin with, so its pretty rotten even at the very bottom

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
592 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5609 readers
383 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS