865
Not enough monitors (lemmy.world)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tonyravioli@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

Legitimately what is the ultrawide monitor that's angled on the desk below the main center monitor? I've been looking for one of these to use for music production

[-] Magrath@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

I think it's just two monitors are creatively mounted. They are just sandwiched between two desks. Ultrawide monitors are generally curved so I doubt that it's ultrawide.

[-] tonyravioli@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Ah, it seems you're right. Unfortunate. If there was a monitor in this form factor I'd instantly buy

[-] GarytheSnail@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

And is it touchscreen?

[-] cooljacob204@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I think it's two monitors next to each other.

[-] MrRazamataz@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Hmm I wonder if that Sublime Text is UNREGISTERED...

[-] Guster@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

As a non-programmer - why does programmers need so much screen space?

[-] lugal@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 year ago

Sometimes it's good to have one with your code, one with the running program and one with a browser looking stuff up. You can argue one or two more (like database model, expected output, ...) but you barely need a whole monitor for each. The photo is just pretentious and comically overdone

[-] noobdoomguy8658@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Pretty much this.

It tends to depend on your branch, though, and in some fields, you really don't need anything other than your code, because you're not testing anything before it's compiled anyway. For something like frontend development, on the other hand, having some extra screen space is a blessing, be it more monitors or just one bigger monitor, especially if you have the tools to easily manipulate the screen space, like automatic window tiling.

To take the frontend example further, when you have something like i3/DWN/sway or any other tiling windows manager (that's on Linux), you can easily set up more "desktops" (workspaces), divided into tiles like the browser window (to preview the changes), your editor (to make the raw changes), and the developer tools of the browser you're currently testing things on. Not like it's impossible to achieve the same with any other tool that lets you create virtual desktops, but the less time and brainpower you use on switching tabs/desktops/workplaces, which you achieve by always being able to access everything you need at a glance, just kinda helps you enter the flow state - you just dissolve into the process completely because you stare at everything you need all the time.

The more you need to look at, the more you gain with these setups. The frontend example from above is a rather simple scenario, which is not too likely in this era, because you're pretty much guaranteed to be using at least one framework, most likely with a live preview feature with real time output of the compiling results and errors. There's no shortage of windows to open, all of which will be relevant and useful to your current task.

Either that or put some non-work related crap on the side to switch to whenever you get mad because you don't get the result you wanted to.

[-] SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 year ago

Like if you're writing an essay on paper. You have your desk covered with a reference book or two, your draft version, working version, assignment, additional clarifications and notes, ... It would be such a hassle to put it all in one neat stack and search for whatever you need every time.

So programmers like to have the programming manual, design, notes, remarks from the customer, ... spread out over the screen(s) instead of switching back and forth every time.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago

Java class names.

[-] inetknght@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As a programmer:

  • one 1080p screen for work chat/email
  • one 1080p screen for code with 3-6 pages open simultaneously (approx 80x24 or 90x40 depending on whether the file tree is also open)
  • one 1080p screen for a terminal with 4-6 terminal sessions displayed (80x24)
  • one 1080p screen for reference documentation
    • or more 1080p screens for even more documentation as rabbit holes in documentation can go quite deep

...and that's before even more screens for monitoring services, CI status, rabbit holes in documentation, etc.

Then there's video chat. It gets really fun when someone asks "@inetknght, can you share your screen?" during a video call. Then I have to pick which screen gets shared and hope it's the right one. It would suck if they how many emails I ignore. I currently have 15,070 unarchived emails in my inbox spanning over a decade. I'll get to cleaning that inbox when the bug reports stop coming.

Plus, I sometimes run VMs fullscreen. It's best to do that on a dedicated monitor. Especially if there's multiple VMs running. Otherwise good luck finding the real desktop!

[-] ZagnutInSpace@literature.cafe 4 points 1 year ago

Imagine trying to read 5 different books at once while simultaniously writing 30 books at once.

[-] Synthead@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Wow, what a horrible setup.

[-] freeman@lemmy.pub 4 points 1 year ago

I have a guy that does this. He puts so much effort in weird mobility solutions (ie: Dual monitors on a rolling table so he can work outside sometimes) or having a setup like this with TV's, monitors etc all cobbled together.

Would you be surprised to hear hes not the most organized or efficient.

[-] Synthead@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

For real. It's so much better to think about using the screen space you already have. People can do what they want, but I am happy with one screen, a tiling window manager, and workspaces. I can have a dozen or more things going on, and have it packed on a workspace. Fullscreen a window of I need to, then pop it back.

It's incredibly efficient. I see stuff like this, and I imagine what it's like to have text several feet away, screens covered by other screens, lots of neck fatigue, all the monitor borders... like it's truly bad. It feels like someone watched a lot of TV and "felt" that this was the best way to do it without trying it.

Butt I digress. It's not my setup. If they're efficient with it, more power to them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wtvr@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

That monitor setup is making me feel all tingly. Legit question: how much would a setup like that cost?

[-] CCF_100@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Your comment makes me think you'd like this meme I found the other day

[-] wtvr@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Bahaha yes exactly

[-] PeWu@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I felt loneliness when my third monitor broke, can confirm.

[-] Kes 5 points 1 year ago

You just need 3 largish televisions, a small TV or monitor for the top, and stuff to mount each screen in that configuration. Your PC doesn't need to be that good unless you are doing something like gaming, just enough to run 4 1080p windows. Once you connect them, it's fairly easy to adjust the configuration in Windows to extend and rotate the monitors to make the setup work. Depending on how you get the televisions (you can buy them used, flat screen 1080p TVs have been popular for a long time and are relatively affordable) and how you decide to mount them, you can build this setup for only a couple hundred

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BluDood@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

bro even got the RGB soundbar ⁉️

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] snooggums@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Hello Wurld

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
865 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

32536 readers
482 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS