293
What year is it? (lemmy.world)
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 17 points 2 hours ago

kamala was not pro corporate.

[-] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 3 points 26 minutes ago

Lol, good one mate

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 2 points 11 minutes ago

What the actual fuck are you on about

[-] metaStatic@kbin.earth 4 points 1 hour ago

only as much as every politician since Clinton

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 7 points 1 hour ago

we actually had some monopoly busting action going which is now going to be in the shitter.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 2 points 1 hour ago

Monopoly busting is good for the other corporations. Just because a company does anti-consunmer behavior doesn't mean they aren't also get screwed by another company's anti-consumer behaviors.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 5 points 54 minutes ago

yeah just like adequate tax and regulation is good for rich folks. thats the thing. not having monopolies is good for society in general.

[-] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 4 hours ago

Almost as if they are doing it on purpose and are just the more culturally liberal of the two Wall Street parties... 🤔🤔

[-] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 32 points 4 hours ago

Someone like AOC and Bernie will never be allowed anywhere near actual power. God damn money.

[-] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 hours ago

and even if they did get in power, they'd still support NATO and imperialism in general, still support capitalist exploitation, and still would only pay lip service to or fight symptoms of systemic issues instead of ripping the cause that is capitalism out by it's root

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Not one of you clowns has any actionable idea.

[-] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 3 hours ago

Cries in Latin-American Spanish

[-] sit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 4 hours ago

And this is when you vote for a third party. IMO the mentality of “having to vote one of these two” is toxic for a democratic system.

It’s a trap and these two parties massively profit off of it.

[-] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 hour ago

And this is when you vote for a third party. IMO the mentality of “having to vote one of these two” is toxic for a democratic system.

So close, and yet so far.

The third party isn't going to save you from the toxic system, nor stand a chance to fix it.

You can't reform the system, nor fix it from within no matter how hard you participate. It must be completely eradicated from the root.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Its the fundamental death of democracy. There is only ever one "correct" choice on the ballot. No real decision except to show up and vote straight ticket or suffer guilt or derision from your peers.

This works just as well on Republicans as Democrats. You don't see any dark horse Buchanans or Perots on the ballot anymore. Conservatives know any vote for someone other than Trump will be seen as a vote for the Democrat, just like Liberals know the opposite. And when the top of the ticket sucks (as with Hilary in 2016 or Romney in 2012), turnout sags and upsets happen.

The bitter truth Dems can't face is that they ran bad candidates on weak platforms after disappointing terms in office. And this is what drove down turnout. Not insidious Arabs or nefarious Jill Stein voters or Russia. If they'd had a candidate as appealing to voters as Trump, running on the left side of the ticket, they could have won. Instead, they shed 15M votes chasing the Liz Cheney endorsement.

[-] DashboTreeFrog@discuss.online 15 points 3 hours ago

I hate that you're not wrong. Gotta get rid of the current "winner take all" electoral system first though...

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

Mandatory vote, ranked choice, popular no electoral

[-] sit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 hours ago

Im with you. If such trap can exist the system is wrongly setup.

That's not possible in the current electoral system. Therefore voting third party needs to happen first.

Or really, the thing we can't say in the Internet anymore and the thing that you liberals hate more than the thought of losing capitalism itself.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 hours ago

My understanding is that for third parties to become viable at the presidential they have to have first become viable in other levels of government. A third party presidential candidate should be the culmination of bottom up building, not a once every 4 years thing.

[-] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 minutes ago

You're correct. The US third parties have never been acting in good faith, with few exceptions.

[-] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

The right won. They had more votes because many who voted democrat in 2020 voted red. How does going further left change that outcome?

If voters wanted politicians that are further left then wouldn’t they have voted for the politician that is furthest left?

I think most people just voted republican because they experienced inflation under Biden and dont understand why.

[-] SparrowHawk@feddit.it 11 points 4 hours ago

It's not soorts teams. Going further left means reaching rural people and poor people. A lot of the working class just isn't aware of what left and right mean. If the left let's republican dictate who is taking those ppl's side this is how it's auways gonna end. Posh elitism has failed yet again

[-] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago

There was an election between an independent union leader and a career politician in Nebraska and the career politician won by a landslide. How do you explain that?

The career politician ran a better campaign and lied more believably.

Also not all union leaders are left wing, paradoxically. There are legitimate reasons that Americans distrust unions.

[-] niucllos@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago

One example does not a rule make, and in the US electoral system money (and the party affiliations that bring it) speaks loudest of all. Maybe going further left wouldn't work, but going further right certainly hasn't. When Harris first emerged as the candidate she had such a swell of support, as she moved further right she lost it.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 minutes ago

One example does not a rule make

Missouri voted to overturn abortion ban and voted for republicans.

Florida nearly voted for abortion ban and voted for republicans.

Americans have shown they want change but they also don't understand how that can be achieved.

Apparently Biden/Harris chose not to push 'make things better' magical button in the Oval Office so they're getting the boot and the guy who shat the bed earlier is now getting the opportunity to burn the house down.

[-] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Voters are saying it is because of inflation. Not because she didn’t go further left.

[-] H1jAcK@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago

Nebraska isn't a homestead of liberal ideals?

[-] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago

Neither is the entirety of America.

[-] DeadPand@midwest.social 1 points 1 hour ago

How does Bernie win again and again then?

[-] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago

He hasnt been able to win outside of Vermont. Even when he lost the primaries he it was because he didn’t have enough votes.

[-] bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net 6 points 4 hours ago

They don't care about winning. They care about being cool at the right DC cocktail parties,which they have achieved by extracting their own base from the party in favor of a war criminal who left office with 13% approval.

this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
293 points (100.0% liked)

Lefty Memes

4278 readers
1289 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

0. Only post socialist memes

That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)

1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here

Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.

2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such,

as well as condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.

3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.

That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).

4. No Bigotry.

The only dangerous minority is the rich.

5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)

6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.

7. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

(This is not a definitive list, the spirit of the other rules still counts! Eventual duplicates with other rules are for emphasis.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS