1251
submitted 1 year ago by unlawfulbooger to c/196
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] onichama@feddit.de 78 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately it's not the people here that need to read this

[-] Gormadt 80 points 1 year ago

In this community? It's useful for talking points

Lemmy in general? There's a lot of people on Lemmy who need to read this.

[-] hemmes@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, wow. Post got me using the bookmark function.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 year ago

It might help someone explain it later though, it's a good parallel

[-] Pattern@artemis.camp 27 points 1 year ago

You’d be surprised how widespread misunderstanding of systemic racism is, even on the left.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SeborrheicDermatitis@hexbear.net 62 points 1 year ago

Naturally the account has been suspended lol.

[-] WizBizX05 39 points 1 year ago

Reddit moment

[-] Rozauhtuno 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you think that the problems (inequalities) racism brought ceased to exist with segregation, try learning about red-lining and how countless black neighborhoods got unfairly bulldozed to make space for highways. All that stuff happened only a lifetime ago, of course its effects can still be felt today.

.You could also use the same reasoning to argue that colonialism hasn't really ended either, when the colonialists went home they still left behind the scars of centuries of exploitation, that shit doesn't get washed away in a day.

[-] microphone900@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago
[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

colonialism is also still enforced today - IMF loans that force austerity policies on receiving nations, coups that topple popular governments and replace them with dictatorships that are friendly to western interests, the fomenting of civil wars and conflicts that frequently genocide entire populations, the sale of arms and training to far-right militias. neocolonialism doesn't involve direct rule but it's merely the form that's changed, not the character or the consequences.

[-] ichmagrum@feddit.de 44 points 1 year ago

... did you just straight-up post a reddit comment?

[-] Blyfh@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Aaand? People have always sent screenshots of posts from other social media on social media. Nothing new.

[-] unlawfulbooger 20 points 1 year ago

Yes, lol.

But in my defense, I’ve had this saved on my phone for over a year, and I probably got it from /r/196 to begin with :p

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] marx2k@beehaw.org 30 points 1 year ago

My mother worked for a real estate firm in the late 90s in bay ridge, Brooklyn where she was told to tell anyone calling in who sounded black or had a "black sounding name" that nothing was available or to quote ridiculous prices.

This shit ain't gone away at all.

[-] lixxday@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 year ago

Damn this is an excellent example. I'm 100% going to use this image in the future, thanks!

[-] Grownbravy@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago

Also, it’s easier to completely demolish the building. Accommodations can be made much easier, but no one does it because it’s too much work, the disabled people of the metaphor are figuring out ways around it.

Also the anti-disabled people knickknacks are still displayed EVERYWHERE desolate

[-] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 year ago

I live in hungary and when i went to san francisco one of the things i noticed that every shop, bus, street, etc was built in a way that it would be easy to use by disabled people. So regulations can help and people should support politicians eho actually want to change things(even when it turns out to be a little stupid like the cancer warnings on basically everything). Also californians are so warm and welcoming compared to hungarians.

[-] Grownbravy@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

to continue this incredibly labored metaphor, yeah things are kinda nice for everyone when there are accommodations for disabled, or mobility compromised people. There's a term for when accommodations for one group, like sidewalk curb cut-outs, actually have a multiplicative benefit for everyone, even outside of the principle group. Curb cut-outs on sidewalks make it easier for wheelchair users, and the blind, but also they benefit strollers, old people, and delivery people getting up the curb.

so making the house nice for disable people actually makes it nice for everyone.

to drop the metaphor, yeah getting rid of systemic racism is actually nice for everyone

[-] stereofony@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

And these ADA accommodations were hard-fought for by disability activists, many of them disabled themselves because nobody else cared! The same thing is happening with any kind of prejudice or injustice against any marginalized group. We need to stop with the "fuck you, I got mine" mentality if we hope to advance as a compassionate species. But the older I get, the more I feel the tribalism is too hard-coded into humans and is too easily exploited by greedy/fascist interests. Solidarity is the only way...if we could just get over ourselves for one second.

[-] OrnateLuna 7 points 1 year ago

Not to mention that the hotel does what it can to keep existing through anti disabled propaganda and incentives for the workers to be anti disabled

[-] Grownbravy@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

“That’s just the culture around here”

huh

[-] Nerorero 24 points 1 year ago

But on top of that, the previous owner raised the new one. On top of the hotel issue we now have the same issues, but with the new owner

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

The analogy is a little shaky but yeah that's a pretty good intro. The hard issue to solve here is with how this injustice is resolved. I think the most reasonable solution attacks the problem directly: rewriting racist laws (like zoning) and punishing or heavily disincentivising racist behavior in government officials (including police and judges). In the analogy, this would be equivalent to enacting hotel policies against discrimination and retrofitting disabled-accessible options into the building.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Zeshade@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What view are they trying to counter here? I understand all the words of the post and I agree with the logic but I don't see in what situation this argument is useful. Perhaps I'm lucky not to have been exposed to the people for whom it would be useful...

Edit: I saw some very clear answers to my questions after scrolling down a bit. I think I just didn't understand what the term "systemic" meant here.

[-] drislands@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

There are people who believe that any kind of fix to counter discrimination is unnecessary, because "well I'm not racist, and I certainly haven't discriminated in X way, so nothing needs to change". They are either unaware or ignoring the reality that the effects of past discrimination don't go away just because the people that did it are gone.

[-] Zeshade@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Thank you. I never thought of it that way even though I'm quite passionate about the topic. Passionate but not well informed it seems...

[-] shapis@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago

"wow you are trying to punish x people for wrongdoings of their parents/grandparents" is the argument it's trying to counter.

[-] cuchilloc@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I thought this was fuckcars for a second and it would end differently , but very similarly!! Car centrism is another form of discrimination.

[-] unlawfulbooger 7 points 1 year ago

Yes! I’m very glad to live in a place where at 32 I still don’t need a driver’s license. I can see how crippling and isolating it can be to need a car (e.g. North America), but not being able to drive it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sunbytes@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Oh that's neat!

[-] Chriszz@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Does a business owner need to accommodate disabled people? Answer in your own opinion

[-] ilikekeyboards@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

By law, yes, because you people wouldn't never account for any kind of minority unless if forced.

Y'all wouldn't return the cart unless to recover the coin. There's people beating up rough sleepers. People are intrinsically selfish

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] irmoz@reddthat.com 14 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

"This is the way it's normally/always been done" is an extension of that shit, usually done to excuse things that should not be excused and can and should change.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
1251 points (100.0% liked)

196

16533 readers
1948 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS