900
submitted 2 days ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/politics@lemmy.world
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Bernie is such a good guy. The Dems have done him dirty so many times, they are currently continuing to support many harmful policies but he understands what's at stake and he puts all of that aside to do the best he can.

He doesn't have to do this. He's 83 years old and while his cognitive health is outstanding for his age, someone his age doesn't need to be on this grind for us. He probably won't stop until he's forced to due to his health. I love the guy and it's a shame we weren't given the chance to see him take the presidency.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Sorry Bernie but after Hillary ousted you and then Biden was shoehorned through the primary in 2020 I voted for Gloria LA riva and now I've written in Claudia de la Cruz / Karina Garcia. I think voting left of center or even a vote for that hack Jill Stein actually would show the DNC they are losing votes based on their continued shift to the right and I am even considering leaving the party on my registration over their antidemocratic primaries and their decisions to fund the campaigns of right wing extremists under the misguided notion that they're easier to beat.

Dont get me wrong, I hope Harris/Walz wins but I do not support them because their positions continue to reinforce the status quo and prop up a system that supports fascism today, right now, at home and abroad.

Otherwise im voting downballot blue except where there is a further left independent which in my area is viable for another statewide position. Thats the most practical support the " at least I'm not the other guy" strategy will get from me, and they didnt even earn it

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Gaza is hardly even an issue on the ballot, you're picking between slow genocide and fast genocide.

[-] lurklurk@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

Slow genocide is better though. We all get that right?

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

Certainly gives us more time to try to do something about it, yeah.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] wpb@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Slow genocide is better

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The fantasy world the zero-tolerance high-ground morality angels live in is as dangerous as the one MAGA lives in, and ironically has the same victims. They proudly polish their halos nice and shiny while they let the world burn.

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 46 points 1 day ago

Don't support genocide, it's as simple as that!

By the way: Voting isn't actually support. The American system is not set up in a way where votes actually add to the power of the Presidential office. On the other hand, making a deliberate choice not to act does mean supporting whatever happens without your action, which could be genocide. This means YOU HAVE TO VOTE HARRIS IN ORDER TO NOT SUPPORT GENOCIDE. The socialism angels are hypocrites.

[-] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

"Vote for the candidate who will continue to fund a genocide to show you dont support genocide "

Man yall will do anything to avoid a socialist movement.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

there are two facts about this election

  1. there are only two outcomes—0.0% chance for a third party win
  2. both candidates have a bad stance on the genocide

so neither outcome will help with the genocide. acting like voting third party helps in any way shape or form is disingenuous at best. so what should you do?

my argument is that you should vote for the person you can hope to convince on this issue. phone calls, protests, social media, whatever means you have... which of these candidates is more likely to respond to any kind of public pressure about this?

Harris might be responsive, and let's be honest, she might not be. but you know for a fact that it's definitely not the fucking orange turd. Natenyahu wants him to win. how can you ignore that?

load more comments (35 replies)
[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

Voting isn’t actually support

On the other hand, making a deliberate choice not to act does mean supporting whatever happens without your action

Interesting. So, by drag's logic, a Trump voter isn't responsible for supporting Trump, but a nonvoter is.

It's amusing to see the kinds of ridiculous knots y'all tie yourselves into trying to twist around language in an attempt to resolve your cognitive dissonance and punch left.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 46 points 1 day ago

That's a bad headline. Watch his video, he makes a much more nuanced argument.

[-] BigBenis@lemmy.world 65 points 2 days ago

I was a Bernie-or-Bust-er in 2016 because I was confident Hilary was going to win with or without my vote. I deeply regret taking that stance and feel like I let down every woman who's lost rights to their bodily autonomy, every family who was separated at the border, everybody whose life was lost or ruined due to the Trump administration's incompetent response to the COVID-19 outbreak, and everybody else who has been harmed by the Trump administration.

Don't be like me. It sucks having to vote for the lesser of two evils but that's how our system works and not voting or voting third-party isn't going to change that but it does run the risk of things getting a lot worse.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

The problem of the US is that you might lose more voters by dumping Israel than you'd gain by supporting Palestine.

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago

Is there actual polling to that effect?

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

There are some polls that show roughly 35 to 60 percent of US voters backing the sale of arms to Israel, depending on demographics, but there is a very clear divide between Republican and Democrat support so it's disingenuous to say a candidate will lose more support than they gain because that depends on which candidate.

A lot of these polls also use loaded questions like "who is responsible for this conflict" with the two choices being Hamas and Israel, which doesn't really capture any of the nuance of the situation or represent the beliefs of the person answering the question.

[-] Womdat10 6 points 1 day ago

I dont have them on hand, but I've seen a few polls in swing states where 5 or so percent more undecided voters would be more likely to vote for Harris if she promised an arms embargo, as opposed to less likely.

[-] actual_pillow@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

No one actually votes with Gaza or Isreal as a core issue outside of NYC, and the state is eternally blue no matter what.

For better or worse the majority of America doesn't even acknowledge(or even care) the conflict as an issue outside of the terminally online.

[-] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 131 points 2 days ago

Protest voting doesn't work when the candidate you are protesting is the least worst option. Democrats that will not vote out of principle have been conned as badly as MAGA republicans. End of story.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Love you Bernie, but get bent.

[-] Turbonics@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 day ago

War in Gaza... Is Bernie still doing genocide denial?

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

He can't be using the word "Genocide" specifically, because the international court and UN as well as many very old documents allow 3rd party intervention to stop a genocide, meaning by saying that exact word he would be advocating the invasion of an allied nation which is grounds for expulsion from the senate. I'm sure the 49 Republicans and a couple Dems would love to throw his ass out if a vote came up.

Anybody who wants Bernie to use the word Genocide just wants a Republican Senate Majority, doesn't care about Gaza, stop faking asshole.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] HorseRabbit@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 day ago

Your vote only actually matters if you're in a wing state. If you aren't you should be voting PSL or greens.

[-] lurklurk@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

vote blue to start turning the state into a swing state. Definitely don't vote green as they are on the record of trying to make trump win

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 201 points 2 days ago

Once you are under dictatorship, you can't vote to hold anyone accountable. Vote for Trump and you won't have a say in what happens to Gaza. Or anything else.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 120 points 2 days ago

yea, but you get to brag to all the other inmates in the political prison yard that you stood up for your principles by not voting!

load more comments (56 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Bobmighty@lemmy.world 103 points 2 days ago

If you want to engage those bad faith accounts, don't respond to the Gaza thing; that's a trap. Instead, ask about other issues like climate issues, housing issues, food insecurity problems, etc. ask them what their third party candidate has planned for that and ask for evidence of these plans. They'll move goalposts and attempt to get back on Gaza. Keep them coming back to those other issues that affect Americans daily. Many of those accounts are here to derail conversation. Derail them in turn and force the conversation back on track.

Or do what I do and downvote then block, then post the occasional reminder that most of those accounts are bad faith at best.

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] sozesoze@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

First of all, at this point people in the US should vote against Trump for their safety, and that means in the current political system they have to vote for Harris. That's the reality they have to face. The Trump party has made fascist announcements that are real and people should expect them to be made into real actions.

The problem is that the Democrats frankly have abysmal messaging and are drifting to the right further and further while using Trump as a threat to their voters. They adopt anti-immigrant policies and are distancing themselves from pro-LGBT stances, saying it's the states decision. Both these issues as well as demands for a ceasefire poll exceptionally well, but the Harris campaign seemingly don't want the edge. With all this they are signaling that right wing worries about immigrants and trans people are valid, although that's absolutely not the case, and leave people to decide for example "do I want anti-immigrant light or extra harsh anti-immigrant?" when everybody says immigrants are an issue. This is unacceptably stupid and risking the vote. And that's ignoring the elephant in the room that progressive policy like health care is exceptionally popular and using that as counter messaging would win her voters.

We've seen how popular the Democrats got after Harris took over and Walz got nominated. It signaled change. Now all the Democrats say that it's gonna be the same old as usual treading on and the same bad argument vote us or you'll get a dictatorship. I'm not denying Biden dropping out had nothing to do with the surge of popularity, but back then we also had comments like here, basically declaring any dissent from supporting a decrepit old man as the candidate as heresy. Now there are again, only Yes men here saying if you criticize Harris you're a bot or a Trump ass eater. What is wrong with you?

Finally, I have the creeping suspicion that Democratic establishment people don't fear a fascist Trump administration themselves personally as much as the population has to. Trump announces he will go after his enemies, Latinos and trans people (probably all queer people actually). He has anti women's health and rights messaging all over his campaign. But that doesn't seem to be a risk for people higher up in the party. I suspect that when you're rich you don't have to worry about abortion bans or HRT access. And if Trump threatens them with violence they always have money they can throw at him. It's much more comfortable to run a risky neo liberal and right wing platform against a fascist if you can jump ship later on.

[-] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io 113 points 2 days ago

“Gaza is not the only issue” should not be the takeaway here:

“Even on this issue [Gaza], Donald Trump and his right-wing friends are worse,” Sanders said in the six-minute video, which he posted to X. He noted that Republicans have fought to block humanitarian aid to Gaza and that Trump — who has praised Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — has suggested Gaza would be a great site for beachfront development.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago

Not voting for a candidate is not the only, nor the most effective way to push a party to change positions on an issue you care about.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
900 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19136 readers
3303 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS