900
submitted 2 days ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Gaza is hardly even an issue on the ballot, you're picking between slow genocide and fast genocide.

[-] lurklurk@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

Slow genocide is better though. We all get that right?

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

Certainly gives us more time to try to do something about it, yeah.

[-] sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Certainly gives us more time to try to do something about it, yeah.

The time to do something about it is during an election. Politicians couldnt care less what you think after they have your vote. They dont need your money.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

If there was a part of the election to do something about it that time was the Primaries. The primaries that only like 30M people vote in every election. Right now your choices are between death and more death but also closer to home.

[-] sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Harris could still change her mind at the last minute.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

So you're going to get Harris to change her stance by making sure she doesn't become president? And because it was also stated that elections are the time to change them, you also imply she cannot change her mind after election?

Thats some ass logic right there.

[-] sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Well she can change her stance on the weapons shipments any time she wants. Sge keeps losing support every day in the polls, so I suggest she stop digging and try something else. Or she is going to lose. Theres a lot of progressives who will vote for her if she stops the shipments and wont vote for her if she stays the course. This is her choice.

You want to talk to someone about ass logic, talk to her.

[-] wpb@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Slow genocide is better

[-] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Which one should you prefer slowly genocide by starvation, diseases.

Or

Fast genocide by increased bombing and worse weapons.

I don't think this is a choice anyone would want to choose from.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Then we agree that Gaza isnt a partisan choice, but to answer your rhetorical I would choose slow simply because there will always be an avenue for justice as long as some of Palestine remains.

[-] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Gaza is not on ballot I agree. But trying to convince people who don't wish to participate in a genocide by telling them that their concerns don't matter is wrong.

Israel has declared if not by words surely by actions that they won't stop as long as Palestine remains.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

If it matters to you then you should be making intelligent choices to reduce harm to an absolute minimum instead of getting angry and stupid enough to supporting NeoHitler, either directly or indirectly.

[-] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

How different would he be from all the dictators and despots US has propped up elsewhere in the world. World will still turn, sun will still rise. All dictators die, all dictatorship ends. This is not end of the world.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Oh yeah I mean by that logic you might as well also put a cactus in your ass. Why? No need to ask questions, after all, the world will still turn. The sun will still rise tomorrow. Anally insert a cactus right away.

[-] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Sure when that strikes my fancy, for now I will pass.

this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
900 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19136 readers
3275 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS