814

"Most of the world’s video games from close to 50 years of history are effectively, legally dead. A Video Games History Foundation study found you can’t buy nearly 90% of games from before 2010. Preservationists have been looking for ways to allow people to legally access gaming history, but the U.S. Copyright Office dealt them a heavy blow Friday. Feds declared that you or any researcher has no right to access old games under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, or DMCA."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] obinice@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Good thing the "Feds" have zero jurisdiction in my country then. Feck em.

[-] kaffiene@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago

And thus. Again, piracy seems to be the moral choice

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 15 points 3 days ago

Pirates now the only ones preserving this culture, yeah

[-] uriel238 61 points 3 days ago

Feds are wrong, or would be if copyright continued to serve its original purpose (according to the Constitution of the United States) to create a robust public domain.

All media should be accessible through public libraries, and arguments by federal courts presumes that the public does not have vested interest in content. It presumes the government isn't there to serve the public, which raises questions as to why we have government in the first place.

[-] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

This is the kind of fucking bullshit that creates assholes like trump and rfk jr.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] timetraveller@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

So weird because as a kid, I would rent these video games day 1 from the local library… free of charge.

What is the issue now that they are retro. Shame.

Thankful to have all mine.. back… up… and running.

[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Correctamundo! Intellectual property law is yet another thing that needs reform. I don't even like the term "intellectual property". It's a modern invention. For thousands of years everybody just repeated what they saw other people do, in a process called "the spread of civilization." It worked great until inventions like the printing press created opportunities for business people who didn't create anything to get rich by getting exclusive rights to other people's ideas. But even then, copyright was always something you held not something you "owned". The modern IP industry has done a very effective job at converting everybody to think of rights as property and infringement as theft. We need to return to the original concept that creators, who used to be freely imitated, can temporarily have exclusive rights to what they create because the public lets them. There's nothing evil about this, it's just a return to sanity.

[-] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 129 points 4 days ago

Read a comment a while ago that if libraries weren't a thing today and someone would propose them, the FBI would be on their ass and stalk after them for even suggesting such radical views. Copyright law is utterly broken and a disservice to society in it's current form and execution. Politicians need to get their fat fingers out of the stock market by law.

[-] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 38 points 4 days ago

I really feel like the source code needs to be released after 25 years. We need to be able to protect older games.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NutWrench@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

I'm glad I keep backup copies of anything that might be important later on, like the 40 gig MAME Rom library.

[-] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 65 points 4 days ago

It sounds like the problem is not with the feds but with the DMCA. It needs to be overturned.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 47 points 3 days ago

OK, I'll download them then.

[-] wavebeam@lemmy.world 58 points 4 days ago

They’re right. I have been using old videos games for recreation. Too bad that they’ve decided to prevent me from paying for the privilege or at least being tracked through library usage and have instead decided it’d be better if I was just an untrackable “criminal”

Either way, I’m enjoying these old games and living my life guilt free.

[-] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago

You'd better not also be reading books for fun. By their logic, any recreational use of books from a library should also be considered illegal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The purpose of the US government is to create as many criminals as possible to put in gulags and sell into slavery. That has ALWAYS been the history of the US. There has NEVER been any "freedom" involved. Oh, Bill of Rights, you say?...NONE of them stop what I just laid out, and those rights were reserved for a very limited group of people and you are not one of them

[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 135 points 4 days ago

That's cool. Won't really stop any of the shit that's been happening though.

Good luck corpos, for every pirate you take away ten more will take their place.

hack the planet

[-] Fuzzy_Red_Panda@lemm.ee 38 points 4 days ago

They're trashing our rights!

Hack the planet!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] mPony@lemmy.world 74 points 4 days ago

FTA

Industry groups argued that those museums didn’t have “appropriate safeguards” to prevent users from distributing the games once they had them in hand. They also argued that there’s a “substantial market” for older or classic games, and a new, free library to access games would “jeopardize” this market. Perlmutter agreed with the industry groups.

So as long as someone, somewhere, might make a penny off of them, they can't be free. Insert your own metaphor here.

[-] zarenki@lemmy.ml 25 points 4 days ago

This argument is even more ridiculous than it seems. During the copyright office hearing for this exemption request (back in April), the people arguing in favor of libraries talked about the measures they have in place. They don't just let people download a ROM to use in any emulator they please. It's not even one of those browser-based emulators where you can pull the ROM data out of your browser cache if you know how. It's a video stream of an emulator running on a server managed by the library, with plenty enough latency to make it very clearly a worse gaming experience.

It's far easier to find ROMs of these games elsewhere than it is to contact a librarian and ask for access to a protected collection, so there'd be no reason to redistribute the files even if they were offered, which they aren't.

On top of that, this exemption request was explicitly limited to old games that have been long unavailable on the market in any form, which seems like an insane limitation to put on libraries, places that have always held collections of books both new and old.

All of that is still not enough to sate the US Copyright Office, the ESA, AACS, or DVD CSS. Those three were the organizations that fought against this.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago

It's been demonstrated multiple times that when you make access easy and affordable people will pay for it over pirating it.

[-] Pulptastic@midwest.social 17 points 4 days ago

The same logic would apply to books. ::gestures at library::

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 days ago

They also argued that there’s a “substantial market” for older or classic games, and a new, free library to access games would “jeopardize” this market. Perlmutter

And if that market demand isn't being catered to, or is being actively refused to be served, is there any wonder people are finding other ways to get that stuff?

All they're doing is hoarding this old software and preventing its use based on the speculation that they might eventually figure out a way to profit from long gone developers work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

The problem with these fundamental rulings is that they're largely trying to fit square objects through round holes. When a simple ruling is made to essentially say "to current law, no", the law itself ultimately becomes meaningless, because older games couldn't be easier to pirate. Most of them are smaller than a TikTok video, and are so cheap/easy to host that you'll never stop them from being shared. Hell, emulation has come so far that you can effectively emulate these games on a browser, on multiple devices, even devices that don't natively support gaming.

The smart thing to do would be to say that maybe the legal framework that embodies retro gaming needs to be researched and heavily considered. It's a hard task that'll require many lawyers, many fights, and lots of lobbying to ensure the word of law is worth something. Sadly, it's easier to say "lol no" and to essentially just promote piracy.

[-] xep@fedia.io 104 points 4 days ago
[-] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 48 points 4 days ago

I'd say it's more intolerably long copyright terms than the DMCA specifically.

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 45 points 4 days ago

The DMCA is just the icing on top of the 95-120y "work for hire" copyright duration shit cake.

[-] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 40 points 4 days ago

Sharing is caring

[-] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 22 points 3 days ago

Land of the Free, everybody

[-] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 65 points 4 days ago

People will just continue pirating those games then.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 40 points 4 days ago
[-] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 days ago

Hey now...we all of course only have copies of our own blurays and DVDs on our home media servers.

[-] Vaggumon@lemm.ee 59 points 4 days ago

Yo ho ho and fuck the police

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 29 points 4 days ago

insane takeover of the public square here.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 45 points 4 days ago

“Fair Use” is a thing. Someone needs to go back to law school.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 39 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Pearson is trying really fucking hard to write that out of the public consciousness. I took an econ 101 class about 12y ago for funsies and the section of the course on copyright insisted that "the rights of copyright owners" were absolute with no exemptions.

[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

Of course, it's in their best interests to falsely educate.

IMO when it comes to educational books that are intended to be used within an educational system like a college, first amendment shouldn't apply. The entire purpose is to educate the public your freedom of speech interferes with facts. Should it be found that your books consciously represented misinformation, the company is automatically found at fault and must recall then replace all books at their own cost and be fined tens of thousands of dollars per book that remains after five years.

Should they fail to replace 80% of all sold books within those 5 years, the entire chain of command responsible will face prison terms no lower than one year.

There were so many textbooks I had through my years of education that were blatantly wrong.

I'm also looking at those schools who want to teach creationism in place of evolution. Can't misrepresent facts when the books you can use get recalled.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 19 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

stop giving money to lobbyists

🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

That's not enough, let's outlaw lobbying.

[-] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

Oh yeah? ~reaches for feathered Tricorn~

You don't say? ~shifts buckaneer coat across shoulders~

No, you don't mean that? ~straps on pistol/saber belt~

Why would you say such a thing ya daft cunt ? ~quote by nearby African Grey Parrot~

https://youtu.be/gP9qaDhcSwQ?si=fXLBBjA0VxJeHcja

How does a 1998 law have retroactive rights over previously published works?

[-] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 39 points 4 days ago

you can't stop the signal, mal

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Does this mean my library isn't allowed to have games you can check out anymore? It's been doing that (and other things that aren't books) for at least a decade now with donated items.

[-] yamanii@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

This is more about the online one you can do with books and movies, they wanted to expand it to retro games and ESA fought tooth and nail to deny it.

[-] Hackworth@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago

Shithole country.

[-] nucleative@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

I could lend out my old computer with old games installed to somebody else to use, right?

What if instead i lend my hard drive, is it still the same thing? Or what if I lend out my remote access screen sharing password to my old PC. Still the same?

Maybe the legal workaround is to game the system here a bit - forget downloading executables which feels a lot like pirating and just lend access to a system that is legally running the original license.

[-] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 6 points 3 days ago

Not a lawyer but I believe in the US this would be legal as you are granting the use of the original license and not duplicating any content for simultaneous use by others.

What I would like to see is a gentlemans agreement of sorts where companies agree not to come after people for playing pirate, emulated or archival copies of games that are decades old and not for sale in any format anymore. I guess this is somewhat encompassed in the framework of "Abandonware".

[-] mm_maybe@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 days ago

Well, maybe we need a movement to make physical copies of these games and the consoles needed to play them available in actual public libraries, then? That doesn't seem to be affected by this ruling and there's lots of precedent for it in current practice, which includes lending of things like musical instruments and DVD players. There's a business near me that does something similar, but they restrict access by age to high schoolers and older, and you have to play the games there; you can't rent them out.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
814 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58998 readers
3173 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS