843
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 122 points 11 months ago
[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 62 points 11 months ago

It's nonsense to assume that every vote for Stein in 2016 would have voted for Clinton. Most exit polls showed that people who voted for Stein or Johnson would not have voted in the first place. Hillary was a losing candidate from the start.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 55 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Nobody ever claimed “everybody”, just the “enough”, and the data actually reflects that. Even if they didn’t vote, Clinton would’ve won.

I voted for Stein for 2016 (before we knew what we know now), and I voted for Howie Hawkins in 2020. But then I lived in New York, and I knew my vote wouldn’t matter, so I could vote my conscience without threatening the concept of democracy. This year I am in Florida, and I damn well fucking know I’m gonna vote for Kamala Harris and a straight democratic ticket below that. Because I understand the consequences of my actions.

[-] sirboozebum@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Let us salute this brave soul who has moved to Florida.

God speed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 43 points 11 months ago

Anybody who cares about Green policy should vote against Trump.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago

Logically, yeah.

But if these voters were logical they would realize the issue with FPTP voting systems and not fuck with 3rd parties in the first place.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zanudous@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

Imagine supporting a political party so unappealing to a majority of the population, that you resort to blaming them when you don't win.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

Trump was appealing enough to win. Was it that he was actually good or are a good portion of voters just fucking idiots?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

Nader is a mich better example. If 99% of the Florida Nader voters had stayed home and the remaining 1% voted for Gore, he would have won even with the Supreme Court's decision to stop the recount.

[-] Antagnostic@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

This tbh, if we don't want Green votes, make better reasons to them to vote the way you want them to vote. They vote green because they don't agree with the other candidates. They should fix that instead of complaining about it.

[-] Grebes@sh.itjust.works 25 points 11 months ago

Somehow “not facism” isn’t enough for some people

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 months ago

Funding genocide is fascist.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 63 points 11 months ago

Qualifications considered by those funding her campaign:

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] takeda@lemmy.world 61 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

For political accomplishments, she did managed to get invited to meeting with putin. You can't be just anybody. You have to give it to her.

As for the qualifications, trump showed us that you can do it at your own leisure, nobody will fire you if you won't do it.

[-] 4shtonButcher@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 11 months ago

This thread mostly shows how broken the democratic system in the US is, not that she did anything wrong. Try coming to a real democracy with many parties and coalitions being formed. They actually thrive on dissent, finding compromise and collaborating for the greater good ;)

[-] prole 48 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Aside from having a friendly meal with Putin, I would say that disappearing for four years, only to suddenly show your face on election years to tear impressionable young, left-leaning voters away from a party that could actually win... that's not a good thing.

If she, or her party, were for real, they wouldn't disappear for four fucking years.

I just wish she, and all of her shills, would just crawl back into the hole they came out of. Hoping this happens in a couple of weeks when she inevitably falls off the face of the planet for another four years.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

Her buddy Putin definitely doesn't think she did anything wrong.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] niktemadur@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago

Twisted mediocre bitch achieved everything she set out to do in 2016.
She must be very smug and proud of herself.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 11 months ago

Liberal misogyny always brings out the vote. \s

[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 30 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Can we just say that, going forward, if you're over 70, we don't want you in ANY high pressure leadership role.

Your career is over. Shuffle the fuck off.

[-] ninjabard@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago

Don't forget an endorsement from David Duke.

[-] sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

thats.. not how endorsements work. Endorsements dont imply any relationship.
I'm not saying that she isnt a peice of shit, she seems to be but we dont need to be making stuff up.

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

yes and no. this guy endorsing her is because he realizes she is their best shot at getting Trump to win.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ninjabard@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[-] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

That doesn't address what they said at all.

[-] BigPotato@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Their last line is "we don't need to be making shit up" and the above poster showed that it was factual. It does address one part.

Not the first part about the mechanics of the endorsement but the final part, implying it's a lie that David Duke endorsed Jill Stein for president.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 27 points 11 months ago

Lists of accomplishments?

Being only relevant a few months during election season.

[-] GeneralInterest@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago

If the US had a single transferable vote system then you could comfortably vote for a third party, if you wanted to, without helping out the opponent you dislike the most.

You just rank the candidates, so you could rank Jill Stein as 1 if you want, then Harris as 2, and Trump below that. So then if Stein has fewer votes than Harris and Trump each have (likely) then her votes would transfer to whoever her voters ranked 2nd.

Under this system, a third party candidate is more likely to win (maybe you don't like Jill Stein, but conceivably a third party could produce a good candidate). The ballot under this system looks like this:

[-] Psythik@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Arizona Prop 140 is trying to implement this exact system. I hope it passes.

[-] ThomasLadder_69@lemmy.ml 11 points 11 months ago

And Colorado proposition 131

[-] xenoclast@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The ballot example is bad, but I definitely think this is an improvement on the current system.

As with every system; someone will eventually find flaws and then it'll need updated. Which is how democratic countries should work.

If someone tells you the system is good enough already, you can guarantee they benefit from some inequality.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] uberdroog@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago

Greens have been a joke since Nader and even then....

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 11 months ago

She's also a Russian asset and a vaccine denier.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 19 points 11 months ago

"Hardest job in the world"?

please 🙄

[-] count_dongulus@lemmy.world 39 points 11 months ago

Hardest job to actually do well?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

I would’ve gone with “most important job in the nation,” personally.

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Limonene@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

Stein has arranged a lot of good climate protests. Never held office though, as far as I can find.

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 11 months ago

She got elected to a town council in Lexington Massachusetts. A whopping 539 votes. The only successful campaign she's run.

How you go from that and 5 other failed election bids straight to running for President is not something I know- oh wait, I do. If someone puts you up to it.

[-] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub 15 points 11 months ago

Depends on how you define success. She seems to do very financially well on running in national elections every four years.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml 10 points 11 months ago

Thank you for bringing more attention to the Jill Stein campaign

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
843 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

9584 readers
1745 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS