647
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 2 points 33 minutes ago

So the main reason to vote for her is "I am not Trump". Is that it? I don't think that sound that good.

[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

i think the bottom text has it wrong.

this is probably a stronger argument to get people to vote for her:

"Kombucha Girl" meme, disgusted face what she'll do

"Kombucha Girl" meme, reconsidering face what her opponent won't be able to do if she wins.

[-] scrubber@lemmy.wtf 1 points 23 minutes ago

what do you mean "ours", did you mean "mine"? I don't know you and I'm not associated to any group except my family

[-] mostdubious@lemmy.world 2 points 42 minutes ago

their value system is completely opposed to ours. there is no point in any kind of good faith debate. they want in groups and out groups. they cannot be reasoned with. drop that entire concept and ask yourself what comes next if the fate of the world hangs in the balance.

[-] PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

If we stopped constantly arguing logic and reason to people that clearly have none, and focused on discussions of how we improve the country through governance and policy, we could actually convert some of them. But If i were to imagine life as a Trumper all I would see is hatred towards me everywhere, why the fuck would I listen to people insulting me?

Not that this would happen because at the end of the day, both sides of the aisles have their fair share of people whose political ideology is just to regurgitate what their own social circles reinforce while simultaneously be unable to withstand some minor pushback on topics and then confirming to the other that they dont know what theyre talking about. And the media will constantly put a megaphone up to this ignorant minority so the other side can confirm to themselves how dumb that side is.

Shit half the time I try to make the point that most people voting for trump are doing so because of their social circles influence on them, and that we should try and treat them with decency if we ever want to change their minds, and I get downvoted into the floor and hear a bunch of "centrist bad" nonsense. Political parties are just sports teams to many at the end of the day, they were raised to follow one and think the other one sucks, and most involved don't realize how brainwashed they are that they now see the other half of the country as a hostile foreign entity.

Meanwhile capitalists rob us all blind and continue to spread this narrative that we should fight each other, so we dont unite against them.

[-] Zansuvobr@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

She does not exhibit leadership qualities. It's going to be preaching to the converted, because only the converted could be so blind to her failings.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago

My favourite is telling a trumper I don’t fucking care what they think.

Letting the air out of their sails is more entertaining when it’s become obvious they are living for the drama of controversy and feeling their opinion matters so much to someone else than the message itself.

[-] mostdubious@lemmy.world 1 points 41 minutes ago

bingo. who would care what a cretin thinks. now, the next problem is what do you do when they still get a say in what your life and the lives of others will be like?

[-] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

let me know when she stops supporting a genocide, promises to retain Ms Khan, and actually has detailed plans for inflation/health care and then i'll care.

[-] Subverb@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

What if I told you: No Shit

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 19 points 20 hours ago

Part of the fucking problem is that Dems seem to have kinda given up on ever getting anything nice. The only thing that matters is "BEAT TRUMP". Healthcare, civil/labor rights, debt relief, the anti-war movement, environmental protections, business regulation, green infrastructure development... none of that is even being offered up.

The only thing you hear is "Whatever position you have, know that Trump will be worse than Harris, so you have to vote Harris". How do you go up to someone's door and ask for their vote on those grounds? What do you say to someone who looks at Trump and Harris, shrugs, and says "They look the same to me"?

It isn't the MAGA voter that you have to worry about. It's the voter that's been getting burned election after election by disappointment and can't be bothered this time around.

[-] mostdubious@lemmy.world 1 points 40 minutes ago

there's no point in trying to legislate when they know that everything they do will be sabotaged by the opposition.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 8 minutes ago

Putting this on a bumper sticker

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago

What do you say to someone who looks at Trump and Harris, shrugs, and says “They look the same to me”?

What do you say? You say "are you suffering a stroke, would you like me to call you an ambulance?"

Americans aren't being given a real choice here, too bad, but that's how it is. Anyone who is eligible to vote but doesn't realise Trump is a genuine threat to democracy the world over maybe shouldn't be allowed to vote.

If you were caught in someplace where you didn't have access to water, and the only choices were a bottle of piss with blood in it (Trump, in this metaphor) and a warm, stale coke light (Harris, in this metaphor), which one would you choose? Neither of them are particularly enjoyable or healthy in the long run, but if you were in a place which had no access to fresh water (spelling out my metaphor here, but democracy), you would die without consuming liquids. Still, you probably wouldn't choose the pissy blood, because that'd actually be dangerous to drink no matter how dehydrated you were. A warm, stale coke light would still be a functional drink, no matter how much you'd never choose it if you had an option.

See where I'm going?

Chomsky did have a good point once about how there's a difference of the type of lack of democracy that you can see between America and Russia. (I'm Finnish, btw, fuck Putler.) He made the point that Americans tend to like to think they have a choice, whereas Russians are pretty openly certain they don't. As a heavy exaggeration, that is. I don't recall which book it was, but I think it was honestly one of his books from the 70's about linguistics, which made it weird, since it started with a chapter about CIA shenanigans and propaganda.

[-] sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I'd never vote republican under any circumstance. ..But if I click "Harris" am I complicit with her clearly stated intentions to commit mass murder, when I also have a choice to not vote for either candidate? Whats the responsibility of individuals which comprise and propel groups which openly state they are about to commit that stuff? Does "Do the least harm" just not apply in some situations? I know that legally its not a defense. If you aided murder you are getting punished unless its self defense, which this is not.

If I travel to the edge of the middle east and someone wants to kill me for his murdered wife and children who died screaming, burning slowly in a israeli hellfire missile strike, do I have it coming? I honestly dont know. Part of me thinks yes, I have it coming if I voted for either Harris or Trump. Can someone more philosophically inclined than me help me with this?

Metaphor wise, it feels like l'm being told to shoot an innocent or maybe get shot myself.

[-] candybrie@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Abstaining from voting makes you somewhat complicit in whoever wins. You have the ability to affect the outcome with whatever choice you make (Harris, Trump, neither). If you choose neither, it is partially your fault the winner won as you could have voted against them.

It can be boiled down to a classic trolley problem. A greater harm the trolley is hurling towards, a lesser harm you could divert the trolley to. You can choose inaction and let the greater harm happen or you can choose action and cause the lesser harm. Most people think the lesser harm, even if they enact it, is better. But it's a classic morality problem for a reason. Some people view the action to cause the lesser harm as less moral even if it prevents the greater harm.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

Does “Do the least harm” just not apply in some situations?

I think its a fundamentally false choice. People get bound up in the moral weight of their vote, when they spend an hour or two making the decision every 2-4 years. Then they spend 2080 man hrs+ / year working for an employer and god knows how many hours engaging in consumerist behaviors which plays a drastically more meaningful impact on the political and social economy of their neighborhood than the weight of their votes.

A Harris guy working for Raytheon has more blood on their hands than a thousand Trump voters who work construction or do email jobs. A postal worker doing the yeoman's work of processing all those mail-in ballots has more consequence to their community than a dozen canvassers trying to GOTV. A gym teacher making off-color jokes about LGBTQ students in the locker room is going to weigh heavier on civil rights than a hundred ACT BLUE donators.

If I travel to the edge of the middle east and someone wants to kill me

After all the bombings and killings we've done in the Middle East, you're less likely to be murdered by an angry local dissident than to die of cholera or dysentery because the place you landed has no access to safe drinking water.

it feels like l’m being told to shoot an innocent or maybe get shot myself.

You're being told to feel complicit in a system that's totally outside your control, while being hoodwinked into participating in systems within your control without thinking about what you're really doing.

[-] lemmy_user_838586@lemmy.world 81 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What if I told you... return2ozma is part of the problem. They continuously post negative articles about Harris and very little negatives about Trump...

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago

very little negatives about Trump…

The problem with lemmy.world is the lack of Trump-negative articles. There simply isn't enough of them.

[-] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 32 points 1 day ago

Um, out of interest I went through their posts of the last week or so. Three were critical of trump, one was critical of biden

Perhaps a bit of cognitive bias going on there?

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

People had an utter panic attack about this a few months ago. It's just that they post so much stuff that their name becomes recognizable so people freaked out because they noticed some of it, a small percentile really, was critical of Joe Biden. They panicked and tried to ban the user from basically everything they could. Most of them never thought to look and see what you did which is this user basically posts ad nauseam everything they can find. Some of it critical of Biden some of it critical of trump most having nothing to do with politics at all.

I had thought that people calmed down and cooler heads had prevailed. I guess there's some weak-willed people still out there though.

load more comments (41 replies)
[-] multifariace@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Has she shown regret as a proponent of profits in the California prison system at the expense of humanity?

[-] xenoclast@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Has Trump? Is it worth giving up your right to democracy over? Giving up the health and welfare of ALL women. The future of the world over? No it fucking isn't.

Vote, and then you can go back to being a faceless idiot on the Internet or bot or whatever.

[-] multifariace@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

If you are bringing up Trump when I talk about Harris, then we are not having the same conversation. Learn how to use critical thinking, even when your "common sense" gets in your way.

If you want to talk about democracy, then we need to address the problem with our system of elections and representation.

If you want to talk about health and welfare, then neither party gives a shit. Harris shows she is okay with the way things are going except returning to Roe v Wade. Trump blames immigrants, his favorite red herring, because he has no concept of health and welfare. Unless you mean corporate welfare.

I'm not sure what you are referring to in "future of the world over."

I can see you are as frustrated as we all are with the direction of our politics. It will never stop me from voting, no matter how futile it seems. I wish everyone did. Again, that leads to the topic of systemic issues with our voting. I hope someday our passions for a just and fair country with sound, constitutional decision making will become reality. For now, we are stuck with bought and paid for politicians and self-righteous eccentrics. It IS hard to accept this state of the union.

[-] kittenzrulz123 2 points 16 hours ago
[-] xenoclast@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

That is correct. That's the argument they were making

[-] kittenzrulz123 1 points 15 hours ago

Two logical fallacies dont add up to a cohesive argument

[-] xenoclast@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

You're so smart!

[-] i_ben_fine@lemmy.one 4 points 1 day ago

You're failing to follow the advice of the meme

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
647 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5345 readers
2748 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS