730
submitted 1 month ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

‘I believed things he told me that I now understand to be … lies,’ Dave Hancock says in new Rittenhouse documentary

A former spokesperson for Kyle Rittenhouse says he became disillusioned with his ex-client after learning that he had sent text messages pledging to “fucking murder” shoplifters outside a Chicago pharmacy before later shooting two people to death during racial justice protests in Wisconsin in 2020.

Dave Hancock made that remark about Rittenhouse – for whom he also worked as a security guard – on a Law & Crime documentary that premiered on Friday. The show explored the unsuccessful criminal prosecution of Rittenhouse, who killed Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

As Hancock told it on The Trials of Kyle Rittenhouse, the 90-minute film’s main subject had “a history of things he was doing prior to [the double slaying], specifically patrolling the street for months with guns and borrowing people’s security uniforms, doing whatever he could to try to get into some kind of a fight”.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Chozo@fedia.io 243 points 1 month ago

Remember the video of him getting into a fight with some teenage girl just a few days before he killed those people? The video they wouldn't let the jury see because it might show that Rittenhouse was an escalation-seeking rage-aholic? The video that his spokesperson has definitely seen?

Yeah, he was never disillusioned. He knew who this bastard was all along. He just stopped making money off the kid, is all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] norimee@lemmy.world 179 points 1 month ago

Why is this waste of space still in the news? And a documentary? Seriously? Can we please ignore him going forward and let him be forgotten, unimportant and inconsequential in a hole, like this litte rat deserves?

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 66 points 1 month ago

Hey, he just wants to kill some more people. No big deal right?

checks rulebook

My mistake, murdering shoplifters is actually still kind of a big no-no. Apologies.

[-] norimee@lemmy.world 42 points 1 month ago

he had sent text messages pledging to “fucking murder” shoplifters outside a Chicago pharmacy before later shooting two people to death during racial justice protests in Wisconsin in 2020.

That was before he went to Kenosha.

And honestly, we all knew he did it on porpouse. This is nothing new. Blowing this up and giving it more attention just furthers the right's hero worship of him.

More attention makes it worse. It makes him an Icon and martyr for the white supremacists.

[-] dezmd@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago

Premeditation and intent. How is this weasely fuck not in prison for life.

[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 month ago

The insidious nature of systemic racism is why. White men are given the widest possible berth to acquire weapons and play vigilante. As we saw here, a white guy who talks about murdering people can, over and over, put himself into dangerous situations until he gets the opportunity to kill and get away with it. This isn't even the only example in the last five years.

[-] medgremlin@midwest.social 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Usually the situation they put themselves in is taking a job as a cop and refusing to deescalate any situation.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Really? They put a rule against murder in the book? Is that new? No? Well then they should tell people that! How are we supposed to know not to kill people if they don't tell us that's against the rules!?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] frezik@midwest.social 49 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately, he is very consequential. If you went to an NRA self-defense shooting instructor in 2019 and laid out everything Rittenhouse did, and then asked if that was valid self defense, the answer would be unequivocally no. What Rittenhouse found was an argument for shooting protestors and getting away with it.

That's scary, because if you spend much time around gun shows and gun clubs, you'll meet plenty of people who are clearly looking for an excuse to shoot somebody with a legal loophole.

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 month ago

The judge created the legal precedent for the loophole.

The greater evil behind it all is a situation where a Blackwater type organization is paid for security and people protest, then they open fire and start killing. They can all use the Rittenhouse defense and get away with it.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

People on the right still believe he was defending himself or just a kid or whatever whatever. This news shows that it was totally planned, that he willingly put himself in harms way to murder people like he was judge, jury, and executioner over some shoplifting.

It’s important that we go “oh look, he really is, undeniably, a rotten piece of filth” and can throw out all these notions of “well-intentioned” people who end up killing people like this.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

For one thing, whether or not you or I like it, he's a right-wing darling and he needs to stop being one.

[-] norimee@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

And that's exactly why we shouldn't give him attention and media space.

He is a "right-wing darling" because of articles and documentaries like that. He is triggering a negative reaction from the other side and that's why he's hailed a hero by the right.

More attention makes it worse.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

If we do not give him attention, they still will. All you are doing is not letting people know who they think is praiseworthy. I don't see that as helpful.

You do not get to control who the right idolizes. All you can hope to do is shave some of them off by explaining why those people should not be idolized.

Why people who have gone through all of childhood haven't found out that ignoring bullies doesn't actually make them go away is beyond me.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

One of the differences between the right and the left, you just made me realize, is how we treat heroes.

Kyle murders two protestors and he's a hero. He can fuck it up, but that's all it takes to get there.

If a left leaning person became a hero for rescuing cats out of a house fire, you'd have a hundred reporters digging up dirt about how he cuts in line at Starbucks, or an ex coworker thought his obsession with cute animal butts was a little creepy.

I'm minimizing. People who do good things sometimes have done real shit but I don't want to sidetrack. Point is, the right elevates their heroes while the left humanizes them. It's not just a different playing field, it's a whole other sport.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 149 points 1 month ago

Wait you mean when he grabbed a rifle and traveled an inordinate distance to the scene of a riot and shot two people to death, he wasn't just an innocent bystander after all?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 129 points 1 month ago

Imagine being such a bootlicker that you want to kill people for property crime, even when that property isn't yours. What a loser.

[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 74 points 1 month ago

He just wanted to kill people. That they were black made it more attractive, and the property crime was a convenient excuse.

[-] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 117 points 1 month ago

Rittenhouse has a hero complex, and can't accept he's nothing more than a deranged little shithead everyone knows is just a murderer that got away with it.

No one likes him, not even the right. The right used him when he was useful and then threw him away. How sad and pathetic that those were his "best" days, and they are behind him.

He'll now try to regain his "glory" days by reliving that time he murdered innocent people. And hopefully this time he's put away for life.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Nah, hopefully this time he bites off more than he can chew and the most that the prosecutor is able to charge his next victim with is self defense or involuntary manslaughter.

He's like JD Vance Jr

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 117 points 1 month ago

He deliberately sought out an altercation and he deliberately brought his gun.

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 33 points 1 month ago

They should have waited to prosecute. He would have lost today.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

That seems like it would violate the sixth amendment. Besides, we knew all of this back then.

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 20 points 1 month ago

No, you have a right to a speedy trial. You don’t have the right to be charged with a crime in a speedy way while evidence is gathered against you.

Sometimes we should wait for them to incriminate themselves.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Soup@lemmy.cafe 95 points 1 month ago

Let’s not forget how the judge in that case dismissed video evidence of him saying he wanted to shoot people. If that didn’t change this assholes mind-

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 94 points 1 month ago

Wait, you mean the guy everyone was saying went to Kenosha to murder people, actually went to Kenosha to murder people?!?!?! Color me shocked.

Only idiots and the mentally deficient bought his official story.

[-] Disgracefulone@discuss.online 73 points 1 month ago

Oh imagine that everybody with a brain was right all along and some f****** lunatic murderer got off again great job America

[-] DJDarren@thelemmy.club 68 points 1 month ago

Jesus, how was Rittenhouse murdering those guys only four years ago? It feels like it was at least ten.

[-] CasualPenguin@reddthat.com 47 points 1 month ago

We're all aging like US presidents now

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The last 8 years have gone by in what feels like months.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 64 points 1 month ago

I wish I was still on reddit for this shit. I remember when it happened and every fucking bootlicking Magoo was defending this shit stain and using the law as if they understood self defense in that context. They worshipped that guy for being "a good guy with a gun" and had every excuse in the world for why he was a victim...

Man I hope they're seeing this.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 43 points 1 month ago

Yeah I was pretty shocked at how widespread his defenders were. Regardless of whether what he did was technically self defense or not, it’s clear he’s a bloodthirsty right-wing fanatic. There’s no need to defend his public image, even if you agree with the verdict.

[-] MentallyExhausted@reddthat.com 28 points 1 month ago

The people defending him were also bloodthirsty right-wing fanatics.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Facebones@reddthat.com 14 points 1 month ago

They'd come up with new and exciting logical loopdeloops to explain how he's still the victim in this situation.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Backlog3231@reddthat.com 51 points 1 month ago

I'll just cry like a little bitch in court again. It worked last time!

[-] Ragdoll_X@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Zero surprises there. So many gun nuts are just itching to kill someone, and to those who were paying any attention it was abundantly obvious that's exactly the kind of person who Rittenhouse is considering his fake crying, taking pictures with the judge, as well as buddying up to nazis and literally making a game to celebrate his shooting.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 32 points 1 month ago

Little pudding faced cunt.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MediaSensationalism@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago

My only weakness was not being cynical enough.

[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

I always knew he was a piece of shit because of how white he is and how much support fox gave him. -- cynical man

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Nougat@fedia.io 28 points 1 month ago

For a gun to be effective against an attacker, that attacker needs to be about 25 feet away or farther when you decide to shoot them. Closer than that, it’s a melee before you get an accurate shot off.

This means that you need to escalate a situation to gunplay way before you’re in actual physical danger, in most cases.

Unless you’re walking along brandishing your weapon, in order to be ready for a possible threat. This in itself escalates any situation you’re in to “one with a gun in it,” whether you’re ever in any danger or not.

Small arms are offensive weapons. They cannot be used for defense without making otherwise safe conditions unsafe, or by escalating a possibly threatening situation into a definitely dangerous one.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 21 points 1 month ago

Generally yes, unless you're already in a defensive position and anticipating an attacker. But I'm pretty sure driving a half hour into the next state doesn't count as a defensive position.

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 23 points 1 month ago

Congratulations, US legal system! You have encouraged a murderous vigilante!

load more comments (23 replies)
[-] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 month ago

This headline/title is in bad need of some commas.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
730 points (100.0% liked)

News

23287 readers
3888 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS