83
submitted 9 months ago by Cornflake_Dog@lemmy.wtf to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Hey there folks,

I'm trying to figure out how to configure my UFW, and I'm just not sure where to start. What can I do to see the intetnet traffic from individual apps so I can know what I might want to block? This is just my personal computer and I'm a total newbie to configuring firewalls so I'm just not sure how to go about it. Most online guides seem to assume one already knows what they want to block but I don't even know how/where to monitor local traffic to figure out what I can/should consider blocking.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 78 points 9 months ago

You've got it backwards. A firewall blocks everything, then you open up the ports you want to use. A standard config would allow everything going out, and block everything coming in (unless you initiated that connection, then it is allowed).

So the question you should be asking, is what services do you think you're going to be running on your desktop that you plan to allow anyone on the internet to get to?

[-] fhein@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

Not entirely clear but perhaps OP is talking about blocking unwanted outgoing reqjests? E.g. anti-features and such since they mention traffic from their apps.

[-] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 3 points 9 months ago

Possibly? The way I read it, it sounded like OP wasn't really even sure what a firewall does.

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

no, not really. on linux that depends on the default policy of the corresponding chains, so it's configurable. I don't think all common distros default to reject either.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

Please stop giving bad advise. The local firewall is not the same as the public firewall and nat on the router. Your comment is incredibly misleading. You can have no Firewall and the services will not be available publicly

[-] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 3 points 9 months ago

What are you talking about? You're assuming that every residential router is going to have some kind of firewall enabled by default (they don't). Sure, if OP has a router that provides a basic firewall type service then it will likely block all incoming unauthorized traffic. However OP is specifically talking about a linux-based firewall and hasn't specified if they have a router-based firewall service in place as well so we can only provide info on the firewall they specified. And if you look at UFW, the default configuration is to allow outgoing traffic and block all but a very few defined incoming ports.

You're also making the assumption that OP is using NAT, when that is not always the case for all ISPs. Some are really annoying with their setup in that they give a routable IP to the first computer that connects and don't allow any other connections (I had that setup once with Comcast). In this case, you wouldn't even need to define port-forwarding to get directly to OP's computer -- and any services they might be running. This particular scenario is especially dangerous for home computers and I really hope no legitimate ISP is still following a practice like this, however I don't take anything for granted.

Regardless of what other equipment OP has, UFW is going to provide FAR better defaults and configurability when compared to a residential router that is simply set up to create the fewest support calls to their ISP.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

You know enough to be dangerous...

Why would an ISP assign a public IP to a users device? That wouldn't make any sense. IPs are rare and expensive so that wouldn't waste it on you. Each customer gets one IP and that is shared for all devices via NAT.

What your describing doesn't make any sense

[-] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 1 points 9 months ago

You're right, it doesn't make any sense. And it didn't make any sense at the time either. After setting up the router with a laptop, I moved the connection to the firewall but it refused to connect. When I finally got ahold of tech support they said the connection locks into the first machine that logs in and they had to release it so I could connect the new machine. And just like that the firewall was given a routable IP address and connected to the internet. Stupidest thing I ever heard of, but that's how they were set up. Now this was around 15+ years ago and I would certainly hope nobody is doing that crap today, but apparently that was their brilliant method of limiting how many devices could get online at once.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

So some obscure thing you experienced 10 years ago is now the standard? I have been doing this a while and what you are describing is Franky crazy and I've never scene it outside of some business plans with bring your own device.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] noddy@beehaw.org 1 points 9 months ago

I fail to see why this is bad advice. Sure you could just disable the firewall on your computer on a local network. But that's under the assumption that you can trust everything on your local network. What if it's a laptop? Do you also trust any public networks you may connect to on the go? Having firewall both on the router and on your computer provides an additional layer of security, and I think that's good advice in general. You can for example set it up to only allow incoming connections when connected to your home network for example.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

There is a difference between good practice and fear mongering. You aren't going to lose it all because you didn't turn on the Firewall.

[-] noddy@beehaw.org 1 points 9 months ago

To be fair I haven't configured a firewall either on my laptop. But that's out of lazyness, not out of good practice. Good practice would be to have a firewall enabled. Just because something is unlikely to happen statistically doesn't mean it's bad practice to take steps to protect against it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] MangoPenguin 28 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

By default it should be configured to allow all outgoing, and block all incoming. That's perfectly fine for a desktop/laptop and you don't need to mess with it.

You can't really do that much outgoing filtering with a firewall that will be useful, because basically everything operates on port 80/443, and often connects to the same CDNs or datacenter IPs for multiple services.

Instead DNS blocking is a much more effective way to handle it, plus uBlock Origin in your browser.

[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

Just to clarify this comment for other "total newbies": yes, the UFW default config is fine and "you don't need to mess with it".

But by default UFW itself is not even enabled on any desktop OS. And you also don't need to mess with that. It's because the firewall is on the router.

OP said clearly that this "is just my personal computer" and here we all are spreading unintentional FUD about firewall configs as if it's for a public-facing server.

This pisses me off a bit because I remember having exactly the same anxiety as OP, to the point of thinking Linux must be incredibly insecure - how does this firewall work? dammit it's not even turned on!! And then I learned a bit more about networking.

This discussion should have begun with the basics, not the minutiae.

[-] MangoPenguin 3 points 9 months ago

Many people use laptops and use other wifi networks or tether to their phone, both can expose you because of unknown firewall states or IPv6 being used.

[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Yes, I am one of those people, literally all the time. This is the point of laptops.

And I use default Ubuntu Desktop config, kept up to date of course.

If that makes me and OP sitting targets, then maybe we should address this concern to the people who make distros rather than to a random anxious newbie.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

Its good practice to have a firewall local as well. However, you are right it about it not being to critical

[-] mub@lemmy.ml 23 points 9 months ago

If you really need one take white list approach. Block everything you don't need and only open what you need. Have fun finding out what you need.

[-] savvywolf@pawb.social 14 points 9 months ago

Worth noting that if you're trying to block telemetery or ads or things like that, using an adblocking dns is probably the better option. Either through a pihole on your network or some online adblocking dns.

Other than that, if you're looking for one because you think you "need" one, don't worry too much if it's just a personal computer connected to a router. Most distros ship with sensible defaults for security.

If you actually want to use a firewall, block all incoming and allow all outgoing is a reasonable rule of thumb if you aren't running a server. Note that "block incoming" doesn't block connections that the system itself started.

[-] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 9 months ago

Blocking incoming traffic and accepting outgoing traffic is usually the default for distributions anyway.

[-] uint@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Debian is a notable exception.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago
[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

Not unless it is a server distro

[-] Cornflake_Dog@lemmy.wtf 2 points 9 months ago

This seems to be some of the most worthwhile advice. I do use a pretty reasonable DNS client (NextDNS) and it allows me to configure some useful filters and such, and when I'm browsing the internet I also use uBlock Origin and manually allow any third party content one by one.

I did configure UFW to block incoming and allow outgoing, and that should be more than enough for me. I think I'm a pretty "standard" user in the sense that I would make a fairly average target for a would-be attacker. It's not like I own a web server with goodies worth exploiting.

A part of me really wants to learn more because at some point I'll have my own router that I'll want to ensure is configured properly because I'll likely end up making my own server for media stuff.

Thank you for your reply!

[-] uint@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I recommend reading "TCP/IP Illustrated: Volume 1, Second Edition" if you want to learn more about networking. Make sure it's the second edition, because the first edition is very old. The second edition is also over a decade old now, but it's still almost completely correct, as the basics haven't changed much. And don't mistake the book to be overly simplified because of the title; it's a very technical book that references the actual RFCs wherever appropriate.

[-] Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show 11 points 9 months ago

You should block everything, except the things you want to get through. A firewall (at least in Linux) blocks everything inbound by default.

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 9 months ago

A firewall (at least in Linux) blocks everything inbound by default.

are you sure? I thought that at least UFW allows through some common LAN services

[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You don't need a firewall on a typical desktop computer. You only need them on routers and servers.

That is because your personal computer is not actually on the internet. It is on a local network (LAN) and it talks only to your router. The router is the computer connected to the internet, and it has a firewall.

The question highlights a classic misunderstanding about networking that IMO should be better addressed. I was like OP once, and panicking about this pointlessly.

Addendum: You're all replying to OP as if they're a sysadmin managing a public-facing server. But OP says clearly that they're just a beginner on a PC - which will almost certainly be firewalled by their router. We should be encouraging and educating people like this, not terrorizing them about all the risks they're taking.

[-] mcmacker4@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

I think you need a bit of Swiss cheese in your security philosophy. Relying only on your router's firewall is a single point of failure. If it fails you are screwed. Relying on multiple layers means if one layer fails, another one might save you.

swiss cheese security model

[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Well, screwed I will be, then. I'm not going to waste my life babysitting a bespoke firewall on my Ubuntu Desktop.

And it seems like a bad idea to be telling beginners on Ubuntu or Mint whatever that their "security philosophy is flawed" and they must imperatively run these 10 lines of mysterious code or else bad things will happen.

This whole discussion looks like a misunderstanding. OP is not a sysadmin on public-facing server. They are a beginner on a laptop at home.

[-] reklis@programming.dev 7 points 9 months ago

I mostly agree with you, but given it’s a laptop that may not always be at home. It is wise to consider enabling the firewall when connecting to other untrusted networks like Starbucks

[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Yes, fair point.

As I understand it, the main risk of an untrusted local network is with DNS. The best precaution being to set it manually (to 1.1.1.1 for example or ideally something less centralized). Actually I used to do that myself, running a stub DNS server on localhost. This kind of option really should be in every OS by default.

Would be interested to know the consensus on better locking down a roving laptop.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

You don't understand networking. The local firewall will only stop traffic coming in locally and your average Linux desktop doesn't have services listening outside of localhost anyway

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] superkret@feddit.org 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

A firewall by default blocks everything coming from outside going in (without being requested).
Firewalls can also block traffic going out from your PC to the internet. In a company where you need to protect against data exfiltration by employees, and as a last resort safeguard against malware communicating with outside servers, you want that. In that case, a security expert makes a detailed plan of all installed software, to determine what needs to connect from which internal IP to which external IP over which port. Then all other outbound traffic is blocked. This needs to be adjusted constantly, every time a new software is installed or an update changes a software's requirements. It's a full-time job.

On a home PC running Linux, that's absolute overkill. There are no untrusted users in your home and you're probably not the target for a directed attack by skilled actors. So just leave ufw on default, which blocks all inbound traffic and allows all outbound.

[-] everett@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago

I think you might be looking for something like OpenSnitch.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago

I would advise that you ignore a lot if the advise here and do your own research. You probably don't need a local Firewall and if you want to block content use DNS and browser extensions

[-] forbiddenlake@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

You probably don't need a local Firewall

If the computer never leaves the house, maybe. If it's ever on public Wi-Fi though, default deny inbound at a bare minimum. Linux computers with cups installed and running but no firewall were revealed yesterday to be vulnerable to RCE.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

Cups only listens on local host only by default. Also it requires you to connect to a printer which is unaffected by the Firewall.

[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

the command ss shows connections

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
83 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

55723 readers
947 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS