599

I looked all over for a date and got everything from "early 1800s" to "late 1800s" but nothing exact, so I had to make an educated guess. The first cameras practical enough to take such a photo were developed around 1840 and the excavations began in 1867.

top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Donkter@lemmy.world 97 points 3 weeks ago

Damn, this really puts into perspective for me that the sphinx was once in the center of a thriving and powerful civilization that completely died. All of that sand accumulated over thousands of years wiping out every trace of the world that used to be there and we only have evidence for it in the handful of mega structures they managed to build in an ocean of nature identical to any other undeveloped part of earth.

[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 64 points 3 weeks ago

I met a traveler from an antique land,
Who said—“Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert. . . . Near them, on the sand,
Half sunk a shattered visage lies, whose frown,
And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,
Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
The hand that mocked them, and the heart that fed;
And on the pedestal, these words appear:
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal Wreck, boundless and bare
The lone and level sands stretch far away.”

  • Percy Shelley
[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

Fun fact: Shelley wrote that poem in a friendly competition with Horace Smith. Here is Smith's version:

In Egypt's sandy silence, all alone,
Stands a gigantic Leg, which far off throws
The only shadow that the Desert knows:—
"I am great OZYMANDIAS," saith the stone,
"The King of Kings; this mighty City shows
The wonders of my hand."— The City's gone,—
Naught but the Leg remaining to disclose
The site of this forgotten Babylon.

We wonder — and some Hunter may express
Wonder like ours, when thro' the wilderness
Where London stood, holding the Wolf in chace,
He meets some fragment huge, and stops to guess
What powerful but unrecorded race
Once dwelt in that annihilated place.

— Horace Smith, "Ozymandias"

[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

That is beautiful as well!

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

I kinda like it better since it makes the same criticism of people who think their works will last forever, but then goes a step further and exposes the same fallacy in modern peoples.

[-] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 52 points 3 weeks ago

Born too late to discover ancient ruins.

Born too early to discover urban ruins.

Born just in time to watch the world die.

Imagine being an early explorer and being one of the first people to see it since the fall of the Egypt. I don't know how close they were to populated settlements, but just... imagine finding a structure no one has seen in hundreds, possibly thousands of years. It'd make the imagination go wild.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago
[-] mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah but we wont dig it up now cause we don't have the technology to preserve them

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

Archaeologists still do lots of digging, and sometimes even leave what's dug up there, although it's often reburied. And it is true that archaeology is inherently destructive. But it's sometimes also necessary to learn anything about the past. Also, in the case of the Maya, it's often more about clearing away vegetation than it is digging things up. The vegetation is already being destructive, so clearing it is often the best thing to do.

[-] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 41 points 3 weeks ago

i was getting ready for forty winks

when, lo, up popped this post on the Sphinx;

that ensued in a long stroll

down the wikipedia rabbithole

and a whole host of now-purple hyperlinks.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 40 points 3 weeks ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago

Thanks. I'm really annoyed I can't accurately date it though.

[-] FundMECFSResearch 5 points 3 weeks ago
[-] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Maybe, between two excavations, the wind has partly filled up the cavity of the previous excavation with sand and thus, the progress wasn't continuous.

This is supposedly from 1867 - 1878:
Sphinx 1878
Wikimedia Commons

[-] gnu@lemmy.zip 35 points 3 weeks ago

I find it a bit amusing that the sepia toning effectively colourised the image.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago

I thought it was a scifi spaceship at first

[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Por que no los dos?

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

It is based on Goa'uld technology...

[-] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

It's too small for a spaceship but it does have 40k spaceship vibes.

[-] Subverb@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

Couldn't find the date?

Did you check the EXIF data?

[-] Zip2@feddit.uk 11 points 3 weeks ago

The exif data is all in hieroglyphics.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

What year was 🕊️🕊️🌊☀️🦉?

[-] FiveTimbers@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

I too was trying to find the date of this photo this week. To narrow your time span, the first aerial photograph (also from a balloon) was taken in 1858 in France. So this photo had to have been taken after that point.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 14 points 3 weeks ago

Fits-sits rule.

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

Why on earth would they need to excavate a balloon?

[-] sxan@midwest.social 10 points 3 weeks ago

Is it just a fabrication that Germans in WWII shot off the nose, then? Because it looks as if it's already missing the nose here.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

As far as I know, that is a myth. It fell off in antiquity.

[-] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 30 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/_0lMkRuk5Dvs/SByi3Ct3GsI/AAAAAAAAAqU/u19MTzxnm4k/s640/sphinx+nose.png
Allegedly, it happened around 50 B.C.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Crazy that we're closer to Asterix's time than they were to when the Sphinx was built.

[-] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yes, the Great Pyramids and the Sphinx emanate the aura of eternity.

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Cocaine or a Michael Jackson thing?

[-] cheddar@programming.dev 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It's true. Hitler wanted to move the Sphinx to his base on the other side of the moon. Of course, moving the whole thing would be too difficult, so they only took the nose.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Hah.

Just in case, though, I'll clarify: what I'd heard was that, when the German army was in Egypt in WWII, some German soldiers used the nose for target practice and pulverized it. No aliens required.

Edit: I'm remembering the story wrong: the target practice thing is attributed to Napoleon's troops using the nose as target practice for cannon. It'd unsubstantiated in either case; it turns out no one alive really knows.

[-] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

Strangely the recent documentation doesn't mention that.

[-] cheddar@programming.dev 3 points 3 weeks ago

recent documentation

uploaded 15 years ago

I hate to break it to you, but this information is heavily outdated.

[-] Senshi@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

The Germans never got even close to where the sphinx is located in WW2. The Allied stopped the Axis advance in North Africa hundreds of kilometres west of there.

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

It looks like a monkey face in these two.

[-] burgersc12@mander.xyz 8 points 3 weeks ago

There's a hole in its head

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Black as your soul

I'd rather die than give you control

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I don't think that's a hole. I think it's the opposite, and an optical illusion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multistable_perception

[-] burgersc12@mander.xyz 27 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Not true. "Shaft A

Baraize also paved with cement this deep hole (shaft A) on the top of the Sphinx's head. The hole measures approximately 5 feet square and nearly 6 feet deep. An iron trap door was fitted to the mouth of the hole. It has been theorized that the hole, began as a means for affixing a headdress to the sphinx in the manner of the New Kingdom (see photo below), was later deepened in search of hidden chambers." From this site

And picture from 1925

and covered later

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago
[-] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

From a quick glance the pic looks a bit like the sand cruiser they used to throw Luke into the sarlacc pit.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Is it weird that I love this photo a lot more than I feel anything at all for the statue itself?

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I always heard this thing was used as target practice by the Nazis in WW2 and is why the nose is all fucked up; but this seems to contradict that. The nose is all fucked up here and it's at most 100 years before WW2 started.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, that's just a myth. There's also the claim that Napoleon's soldiers shot it off. The truth is we don't know when it happened for sure. Medieval Muslim writers claimed it was done deliberately in the 13th century to stop the locals from worshiping it instead of Allah, but we don't even know if that is true. It's very possible it fell off long before that just due to structural flaws.

this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
599 points (100.0% liked)

HistoryPorn

4730 readers
361 users here now

If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.

Relive the Past in Jaw-Dropping Detail!

HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  9. No genocide or atrocity denialism.

Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts

Illustrations and paintings should go to History Drawings

Related Communities:

Military Porn

Forgotten Weapons

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS