1467
Selective rage (slrpnk.net)
submitted 3 weeks ago by ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to c/memes@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 186 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Personally I think a large part of the lack of outrage over the first four is that no one who watched the movies had heard of the source material. People who watch Marvel movies don't tend to read the comics, but Ariel was a Disney movie (one of the most famous of all time) remade as another Disney movie.

[-] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 94 points 3 weeks ago

Correct. Nobody was bothered by Nick Fury’s change for example, even though he went from white to black. That was a wholly unknown character for most Marvel moviegoers. And Samuel L. Jackson is awesome in that role.

[-] WammKD 56 points 3 weeks ago

Actually, Fury's always been black in the Ultimate Marvel Universe; the character and the design was actually based on Jackson so casting him for the MCU probably was an obvious direction choice.

I also had my boss, when I worked in fast food, list this as one of the issues he had with the movie, when it came out (to quote him, "he's a white character; no offense but that's what he is," which was particularly galling, given the aforementioned fact).

[-] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago

TIL; thank you! I was aware enough of the comics to know of white Fury, but didn’t know there is, in fact, a black Fury.

Your boss is an idiot. I’m white as printer paper and would gladly let SLJ play me in a biopic. Because he’s awesome in every role he’s played. Good actors are good actors.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] bassomitron@lemmy.world 57 points 3 weeks ago

Personally, I think the lack of outrage is because the people who get outraged by black people being cast for roles that were previously white characters, aren't concerned when it's white people being cast no matter the source material.

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 66 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

"Personally, I just want to chalk this up to racism so I can be upset about it"

[-] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

"Personally, I just want to chalk it up for people being mad for no reason so I can feel safe in my view that racism is over because Barack Obama or something."

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 22 points 3 weeks ago

Could this be because people don't tend to get mad over things they don't know exist? Naaaaah, must be racism. Anyone who disgagrees that racism is the most likely explanation thinks racism is fake.

What is it with leftists and making mountains out of molehills?

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] bassomitron@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago

Name one outrage among conservatives in the US when a white person was cast for a role that was any other ethnicity in the source material. Sure, it happens on the Left, Netflix is especially accused of white washing (recent example: Three Body Problem). But, conservatives don't give a shit when it happens the other way around.

Regardless, I truly couldn't give a shit who gets cast for what regardless of source material. If the actor/actress is able to play the part well, I come for entertainment and couldn't care less.

[-] Sarmyth@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

The best example I can think of where the race choices really got stupid to the point of offensive was the first "The Last Airbender" movie where the director race swapped the entire fire nation to Indian, made the water nation white when they probably should have been Innuit or something similar, then chose to mispronounce the main characters name to make it sound more ethnic when the source material was in English, so they knew exactly how it should be pronounced.

Then for whatever reason, people got mad that the main character was white when it was the only character animated in such a way they could be white, and the tribe was a nomadic collection of people making it somewhat possible albeit not relevant to the nation theming of the other nations.

Anyways, this triggered my annual Last Airbender rant, so sorry about that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AhismaMiasma@lemm.ee 108 points 3 weeks ago

Eh, plenty of people voiced issues with the racial (and gender) recast of the Ancient One when Doctor Strange came out.

Tilda Swinton is great btw.

[-] TheSambassador@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

I think that this is making fun of the people who were upset at Ariel being black in the remake. The people this is making fun of don't care about recasting race until it's done from a white character to a black one. It's pointing out hypocrisy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 101 points 3 weeks ago

"You will not replace us!" shouted the white supremacists after centuries of erasing a multitude of other cultures, histories, and societies.

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

It has always been about power.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 80 points 3 weeks ago

Thank you for sharing this. I never know why I feel so annoyed at people who are mad about it, but this is it.

This is why "All lives matter" makes no sense

[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 32 points 3 weeks ago

“All Lives Matter” is like a Narcissist trying to bring the spotlight back to them. They can’t stand not having the attention, and will do anything to get it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 69 points 3 weeks ago

In fairness to Tilda Swinton, they decided to entirely rewrite the character to be a Celtic woman instead of a Tibetan man. This was probably to avoid being censored in China, but getting away from the racist 1930s, "oriental mysticism," trope was probably a good idea. It's certainly a lot better than letting Jonny Depp pretend to be a Native American because he's one-eighth Cherokee.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] praise_idleness@sh.itjust.works 57 points 3 weeks ago

I hate it because it's disney and we all know that it's just a braindead money grab virtue signaling and has nothing to do with actual representation or inclusion. Make another Miles Morales, not this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world 53 points 3 weeks ago

I only care when it's stupid, like Medieval Poland being full of black people, not even modern day Poland has that many black people.

You can call me racist if you want but casting a black guy to play the president of the USA in like 1910 would be as stupid as casting a white guy to play Nebuchadnezzar.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 41 points 3 weeks ago

The Witcher isn't in Medieval Poland though, it's in a fantasy land.

Rings of Power was far more dumb because there's black people, but only in a few extremely important roles. Almost as if there's some sort of reverse curse going on, where a baby pops out black, and they immediately make it their king/queen. Or more likely, they realised very late on that they'd made a very white cast, and made a few last minute changes.

[-] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

The Witcher isn’t in Medieval Poland though, it’s in a fantasy land.

So by that logic it's fine to make Wakanda full of white people because it's fantasy land right?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] androogee@midwest.social 33 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Representation matters. Giving the few traditionally non-white roles that get written in Hollywood to white actors is an actual problem.

Getting mad about the existence of black characters in fiction fucking stupid. Really fucking stupid. Unjustifiably fucking stupid. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[-] Ibaudia@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago

Getting mad sure, but it is definitely a dumb creative decision to have characters be random races that don't make sense in the historical context and it's fine to criticize it. If it's a purely fictional world with no basis in reality then no one should care.

[-] androogee@midwest.social 23 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

No. Fuckin stop it. Its unbearably stupid.

Historical fiction has existed for a long time.

Y'all ain't out here throwing a pouty parade when someone adds technology or magic or monsters into historical fiction.

But black people? Existing? If that's where you draw the line, it's really clear why. Make all the excuses you want.

[-] Ibaudia@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

Historical or alternate history fiction falls under pure fiction imo. That's fine as long as it makes sense. If it's meant to be some super grounded realistic historical slice-of-life then it would just make me think "when are they going to bring up the fact that there's X type of person walking around here" for the whole story.

Not exclusive to black people. If there were a story that took place in 12th century Mongolia and there was some Nordic guy walking around I would be like "huh, what's his story" and then be confused when it was never mentioned. That's how I feel about a lot of these creative choices.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

100% agree, but what should be done would be to green light projects by writers of other races based on different cultures and folklores diversifying the pop culture space (for lack of a better term).

What is done instead is treating minorities as a checklist that needs to be checked in every piece of art even when it doesn't make sense for them to be in that story.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 16 points 3 weeks ago

It'd be as bad as having people of color play Hamilton and associates!

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de 50 points 3 weeks ago

So what is white if Romani isn't? I really do not understand the American concept of race, for me they are all humans.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 32 points 3 weeks ago

Hating Romani is more a European thing.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] assembly@lemmy.world 43 points 3 weeks ago

To me, the weirdest one was Johnny Depp as a Native American. Like I couldn’t wrap my head around it in the movie. I kept thinking the plot was that he was a delusional person who believed he was Native American.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Dusktracer@lemmy.world 40 points 3 weeks ago

Scarlet Witch wasn't originally Romani.... she was originally still Jewish. You know, since she was Magneto's daughter. The Romani thing came later. So that's kind of a mischaracterization. The Johnny Depp as native american was super wierd, like the black face RDJ in Tropic Thunder. It was cringe @.@.

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 100 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know how people got that take from Tropic Thunder when they explicitly make reference inside the movie to how messed up and wrong it was. Like, that was the joke. RDJ was playing a character so full of himself that took method acting to it's extreme. Am I missing something? Id love to be educated

[-] captain_oni 55 points 3 weeks ago

No, you're right. RDJ's role on that movie was a joke/commentary about both method acting and black face.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 36 points 3 weeks ago

like the black face RDJ in Tropic Thunder. It was cringe @.@.

Did you actually see Tropic Thunder? It's pretty good. His character is meant to be looked down on and the movie makes that clear. It's more of a criticism of actors doing things like black face and playing disabled characters to chase awards.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago

I absolutely remember people being mad about the first one.

The others not so much. The fantasy movies don't really matter the same way as a historical movie about slavery does. The fantasy characters are even gender swapped without a problem at conventions.

And yes that means the racists who got mad about Ariel are dumb.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 32 points 3 weeks ago

I think in case of Ra's Al Ghul in Nolan movies, the title is passed from one leader to another. He's not a 1000 year old warrior.

load more comments (38 replies)
[-] MolochAlter@lemmy.world 32 points 3 weeks ago

The only one of these that is remotely acceptable, to me, is Tilda Swindon, because they explicitly detached themselves from the character to avoid getting shat on by the CCP for casting a Tibetan and from Americans for casting a Chinese person.

The others are all crap, IMO.

Every time a character is washed we lose the chance to be exposed to global actors that would fit their profile.

[-] MouseKeyboard@ttrpg.network 17 points 3 weeks ago

The only one of these that is remotely acceptable, to me, is Tilda Swindon, because they explicitly detached themselves from the character to avoid getting shat on by the CCP for casting a Tibetan and from Americans for casting a Chinese person.

That makes it worse tbh

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 weeks ago

Wait until you tell extremist, right-wing Christians that Jesus wasn't a white guy! Oooohhh boyyy!

Also, I think it's important to not forget that in the internet age, a very small minority of hateful asshats can appear to have a very large voice. They are still a very small, minority group of asshats.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

TBH I think the bird and in general the music score ruined TLM more than anything

But I'm against the very concept of using Live Action films to perpetuate Intellectual Property rights while skirting any requirement to pay royalties to the original teams who made the animated films from which the remake was adapted 1:1 script and scene composition.

A lot of the other examples here did give really weak or bland performances, I even think the Lone Ranger would have been better without Depp in it.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Don't forget Snow White who looks like a white person but is mixed-race white and Latina, so she isn't white enough to play Snow White.

And also don't forget the very light-skinned black woman who couldn't play Cleopatra because Cleopatra wasn't black. (How do we know? We don't? Cool. Cool cool cool.)

load more comments (23 replies)
[-] LouNeko@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago

My issue is that we are pairing nationality with skin color or ethnicity here. Those are not mutually exclusive. There are 2nd or 3rd generation Asians immigrants in Mexico, just as there are Mexicans living in Ireland, and Irish people in India, etc.. Somebody could be a fully integrated national but not part if the nations major ethnicity. Even saying AFRICAN-American is kind of pointless, like it matters where your grand-grand-grand-grand-parents came from. They're as much American as anybody else. We don't call everybody else European-American for comparison.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] borgertwo@ani.social 23 points 3 weeks ago

Believe me, white folk do get offended about non-white characters being changed to white, in fact they the most likely ones to be offended, especially when it comes to historic figures. All this meme is doing is framing an inaccurate depiction of white folk to suit a biased narrative. Keep in mind also, a minority few cannot represent an entirety. Just as all black or asian folk are not alike, same holds true for white folk. This an era where a difference in race is not the concern, but rather the upper class rich people that use ethnic label stereotyping to have us fight among each other as distraction. Don't fall for their trickery of dividing us.

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago

People would have been pissed if some of those were racially accurate

[-] Shard@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

My problem is her eyes not sharing the same postal code.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] pseudo@jlai.lu 19 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

That funny because when I put my non-USA definition of is white and not-white or african, this image as absolutely no meaning.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
1467 points (100.0% liked)

memes

9948 readers
2756 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS