448

New York City on Tuesday reached a $175,000 settlement with a Staten Island police officer who said he had been a victim of retaliation for giving traffic tickets to people with connections to the upper echelons of the Police Department.

The officer, Mathew Bianchi, filed a lawsuit against the city last May. The suit said that he had been transferred out of his precinct’s traffic unit after Jeffrey Maddrey, then the chief of patrol and now the department’s highest-ranking uniformed officer, asked that he be punished. Officer Bianchi had issued a ticket to a woman with whom Chief Maddrey was said to be friends, according to the suit.

“This settlement is a vindication for our client, allowing him to close this chapter and continue his service with the N.Y.P.D.,” John Scola, Officer Bianchi’s lawyer, said on Tuesday. “We hope that Officer Bianchi’s courage and this decisive outcome will inspire other officers to come forward as whistle-blowers.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 91 points 3 days ago

Officer Bianchi, who joined the force in 2015, said in his lawsuit and in subsequent interviews that the standard practice in his precinct, the 123rd on Staten Island, was to avoid ticketing drivers who had cards issued by police unions — known as courtesy cards — which officers distribute to their friends and family. His troubles in the department, he said, stemmed from his willingness to issue tickets to cardholders.

Naked corruption.

The settlement did not involve any admission of wrongdoing from the city, which in court papers denied most of Officer Bianchi’s allegations, including those about Chief Maddrey’s role in his transfer.

No lessons learned. At taxpayers' expense.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 35 points 3 days ago

His troubles in the department, he said, stemmed from his willingness to issue tickets to cardholders.

And this is why ACAB. If there is a cop applying the law equally to everyone they get punished and pushed out.

Sure, he won his lawsuit, but I'm betting he's still not going to be a cop anymore. And the people involved aren't going to be punished or penalized, they got exactly what they wanted.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 days ago

Let me ask the obvious question: how easy were the cards to duplicate?

Because all it takes is just send them to everyone that lives in the precinct.

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 124 points 3 days ago

Ah, sounds like that traffic stop started with, "Do you know who I am?"

[-] festus@lemmy.ca 104 points 3 days ago

The police literally have 'courtesy cards' they hand out to friends and family to avoid getting them ticketed - that's a practice that absolutely needs to stop.

[-] ultranaut@lemmy.world 58 points 3 days ago

Growing up I had a relative with one of these cards, signed on the back by the leader of the SWAT in the next town over. My relative was high on opiods while driving with me in the car when we got pulled over because he was nodding off and kept swerving and rolling stop signs and doing other dumb shit. He showed the cop the card and that was that, the cop was suddenly so nice and just let him drive off obviously drugged out of his mind with a child in the car.

[-] prole 12 points 2 days ago

Because they're a gang. They "protect their own." Which means relatives of other cops. Not the general public.

[-] alquicksilver@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago

I think it should continue but every person who presents said card should automatically get the harshest legal punishment possible for whatever their infraction was.

Would have been a warning? Guess what, that card now entitles you to a $500 ticket.

[-] grubbyweasel@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I got one of these from an immediate family member and had way too much shame to ever use it and never got a new one. It definitely gives "don’t you know who I am" energy, without actually being anyone, and idk how anyone sleeps at night acting that way

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

Someone needs to print out a bunch of copies and leave them by the mailbox for people to take.

[-] MorrisonMotel6@lemm.ee 30 points 3 days ago

No, but maybe I'll find out when you hand me your driver's license, registration, and proof of insurance like I asked...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 95 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

So they fired, chief Maddrey, right?? Since he's the one who actually abused his position. Otherwise, what the hell is the point of this payout? It'll just happen again.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

They're not trying to stop it from happening again, they're trying to get us all to shut up about it until the next person tries to assassinate Trump so the media cycle can sweep this under the rug. That's what the big settelment is for.

[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 72 points 3 days ago

Original article is paywalled so I looked up another, as from the comments here, it seems some more details are needed. I'll include some snips of a WaPo article here.

One driver giggled when New York police officer Mathew Bianchi pulled her over for talking on her cellphone, because it was the second time in as many days that he had done so, the officer said.

Another was going at least twice the 30-mph speed limit while driving on the wrong side of the street and blowing through red lights, he added.

A third who had been doing 50 mph in a 30-mph zone reacted to Bianchi approaching his Mercedes SUV by fanning out about two dozen “courtesy cards” and telling him to pick one, Bianchi said Wednesday.

In fact, all three of them had the cards issued by the New York Police Department’s biggest union to officers who then give them to family, friends and anyone else they want to be able to get out of low-level encounters with law enforcement, Bianchi told The Washington Post.

“There’s no fear of any kind of enforcement if they have the card,” he added.

Although he let all three of those drivers go, Bianchi eventually got fed up with letting reckless drivers off the hook, some of them repeatedly, and started writing tickets even if they had the cards, he said. That allegedly led to escalating retaliation that in May 2023 resulted in Bianchi suing the city and a police captain after he was pulled off the traffic unit and put on the night shift.

Bianchi patrolled on Staten Island, where he estimated as many as half the drivers he pulled over had one of the cards, he told The Post. Officers can buy 30 of them a year for $1 each, he said. They’re given not only to friends and family, but also in exchange for perks like meal discounts, he said, adding that he believes that is violating the public’s trust that police treat everyone equally.

On Nov. 28, 2018, Bianchi gave a driver a ticket even though she presented a card, the suit states. Several members of the Police Benevolent Association allegedly approached him, one telling him that he had to obey the courtesy-card customs or the union wouldn’t protect him.

Bianchi started objecting to the practice, first to his direct supervisor and then his commanding officer, who told him they couldn’t do much, he said. Then he filed a series of complaints — to the union, NYPD internal affairs and the New York City Department of Investigation — without getting any results, according to the suit.

All the while, Bianchi kept writing courtesy-card-carrying drivers tickets when he thought it was appropriate and kept getting scolded for it, the suit states.

Bianchi said he plans to stay at the NYPD for the foreseeable future, although he plans to use his upcoming windfall to reduce his reliance on the paycheck he gets from the city. He said he hopes that his lawsuit — and his payout — encourage other would-be whistleblowers to speak up about corruption, even if there is a cost.

I'm not sure how much more some of you want out of this guy. He got tired of a crooked system, and at cost to himself, he stood up for the right thing. He's taken more direct action for change than most people ever will. I can't speak of all his actions, but if he went through this much for something like traffic tickets, I don't think he was doing a bunch of bigger corrupt stuff on the side. It would seem we would want more police to follow his example, but instead people here are lumping him in with the rest.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 days ago

I'm not sure how much more some of you want out of this guy

Don't worry, I'm sure the ACAB brigade will soon be here to scream about how this guy is still horrible because he didn't do everything that they personally demand be done...

[-] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 40 points 3 days ago

As a member of the ACAB brigade, this guy is trying to do what is right. The result is exactly why we say ACAB.

Consider this is about traffic tickets and imagine what this guy’s outcome would be if he found something worse. Like something analogous to the LA sheriff’s department gangs, or the Chicago PD’s secret torture sites. We wouldn’t be reading about a lawsuit that he won.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I'm having trouble finding the article, but a while back, there was a detective who was investigating cop corruption wind up dead.

This isn't the case I think I'm thinking of, but here's one example.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago

The part that I have the issue with is the A

Clearly it's not all cops, as this guy (and others who try to do the right thing but don't make the news) demonstrates.

[-] ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee 13 points 3 days ago

The A is because guys like this can’t last in a system designed to force them out.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

I've got a healthy skepticism of authority as much as the next Lemming, which is why I went and saw what info was out there about this. It was easy to find, and it seems to show this guy was retaliated against for doing what was morally right, there doesn't seem to be much denying that. Are we here to role play as wanting social justice, or are we here to support the people doing it? This guy did the literal thing all the top posts here every day say needs to be done: he used his power for good to hold accountable those who were not.

While he may not be Serpico, he's someone we should all be commending in this particular case. We have facts that on multiple occasions he did good for the city at risk to his personal life and career. If someone wants to lump him in with the ones that are corrupt and murderous or look the other way at things like this, they're the asshole. If we don't support this guy, why would we execpt anyone else to follow his lead?

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 days ago

And he's no longer a cop precisely because he was trying to do the morally right thing, that's why ACAB. Anyone not a bastard gets punished for it until they aren't a cop anymore.

[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Bianchi said he plans to stay at the NYPD for the foreseeable future, although he plans to use his upcoming windfall to reduce his reliance on the paycheck he gets from the city. He said he hopes that his lawsuit — and his payout — encourage other would-be whistleblowers to speak up about corruption, even if there is a cost.

No, he is still a cop and wants to use the money to keep doing what he's been doing and trying to encourage others.

[-] prole 8 points 2 days ago

We'll see how long this lasts when they start harassing his family.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

Good for him, I hope he posts on social media every day that he is not suicidal and keeps clear of "friendly fire".

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Avatar_of_Self@lemmy.world 38 points 3 days ago

Several members of the Police Benevolent Association allegedly approached him, one telling him that he had to obey the courtesy-card customs or the union wouldn’t protect him.

Looks like they were correct about that. The police union protects almost anything, except giving those with union 'courtesy cards' a traffic ticket apparently. That is just too far.

[-] prole 17 points 2 days ago

These fuckers give unions a bad name. Shouldn't even be allowed to call themselves that.

[-] JTskulk@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Unions are just organized workers, sometimes the workers are dicks and wrong unfortunately.

[-] knightly@pawb.social 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Cops aren't workers, they're the enforcers of Capital.

The only surprising thing here is that this person thought they could exercise copfriend privileges against an actual cop without getting some kind of blowback. XD

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 51 points 3 days ago

His career is going to be hell. Cops hate a boy scout.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

There are no good apples because good apples routinely get punished, or worse. Its reall easy for group of in cops to explain away how the out cop got shot and died.

Hell the cop they claim got shot by cop city protestors turnd out to have been shot in the back of the head when only other police were behind him and nothing came of that except an excuse to beat up protesters. Cops cause more crime than they solve.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago

The people who said "it's just a few bad apples" are shocked when they did not remove the bad apples and now the entire bag is rotten.

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

He better watch his back. Wouldn't be the least bit surprised if he was suddenly and unexpectedly taken out by a "random" perp...

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

He's still a cop though, right? So he's learned nothing.

[-] walden@sub.wetshaving.social 52 points 3 days ago

The cop is in the right, this time. What was he supposed to learn?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

He was supposed to learn ACAB.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago

he had been transferred out of his precinct’s traffic unit after Jeffrey Maddrey, then the chief of patrol and now the department’s highest-ranking uniformed officer, asked that he be punished.

He's learned that the cop who got wronged can pick up $175k in taxpayer money while the cop who engaged in the corruption gets to keep climbing the seniority ladder to do this shit again.

Everybody wins!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

do you want all the decent cops to quit?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago
[-] AhismaMiasma@lemm.ee 27 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The ones fighting against corruption on the inside, like this person just did. Come on Squid.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Wtf, Squid. You are being unusually unreasonable right now, man.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

And Maddry is still in charge.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 18 points 3 days ago

If Cops got MORE Taxpayer Dollars they wouldn't Need to Punish Officers who Ticket People!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
448 points (100.0% liked)

News

22896 readers
3724 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS