453
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 58 points 3 days ago

Guy threatens to assassinate presidential candidate

Cops: I sleep

Guy steals 3.50$ subway fare

Cops: Real shit!

[-] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 151 points 4 days ago

The article is truly representative of a sleazy drama - and that's putting it nice. We learn that Oliver condemned the post:

Chase Oliver, the Libertarian Party’s presidential nominee, condemned the since-deleted post.

That's great.

But then the LPNH responded - to him - their candidate leader, I stress... as follows:

The Libertarian Party of New Hampshire responded to Oliver’s statement, telling him to “f*** off” and “read any book on libertarianism.” They went on to call him a homophobic slur.

It's seemingly out of The Onion - except it's for real.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 66 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

read any book on libertarianism

I have a suggestion.

A Libertarian Walks Into a Bear. Bonus points because it's even about New Hampshire libertarians.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago

American libertarianism is great. Most of them have vastly different ideas of what libertarianism is or should be, and none of those ideas work.

[-] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago

What you don't want to do whatever you want and pay no taxes but still want the government to supply you with infrastructure?

[-] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 days ago

Seconding this book recommendation. I started skim reading it a few months ago, and it was so entertaining it pulled me in.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

From what I read, it seemed like the problem was more with libertariansthan it was with libertarianism.

Like, the type of person that would leave their homes to live in a town they read about online that promises a libertarian mecha… of course it’s gonna fail. I bet if you get similar demographics of dudes that support Bernie Sanders, that town would fail too.

I don’t doubt that Libertarianism would be terrible for 99% of people, and incredible for 1%, but I doubt it would fail this spectacularly.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

The problem is that American Libertarians aren't libertarian. They're masquerading economic liberals.

The reason their government has failed and always will fail. Is because they are against government itself. All but the most dogmatic, ideological, and importantly antisocial anarchist and actual libertarians recognize the need for government and it's existence. They just believe it should be largely flat, answerable, and as much as possible based in consent. Even national/federal goverment is acceptable depending on structure and ability.

American Libertarians only support government that protects their personal privilege. And nothing else.

And while it's possible for any group to fail. No other group self sabotages so completely from the start.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago

Hey hey, many of those dipshits moved into NH to try and take over the state because we already had slightly crazy politics.

Because NH has 400 stare representatives (and 24 more state senators), it’s easy to get morons elected in small towns. As with most libertarian “plans” though, it didn’t work for very long.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I always wonder why democrats don’t form a plan to take over Wyoming. It’s a very small state. Get together 100k people to move out there over the course of the next decade or so. It’s a lovely state too.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago

Because the LP of NH isn't more than a bunch of bigots and racist hiding behind the LP name. It's like the worst people from every party decided to go and join it.

[-] grte@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 days ago

If you want to know why it feels like that,

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_State_Project

That may have contributed.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

O it %100 contributed to it.

[-] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Oh so, the libertarian party of....every state in the US

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Did you even read the article? No it's not like every LP in every state.

[-] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

...a bunch of bigots and racist...

It's like the worst people from every party decided to go and join it

Yep, just about sums up the Libertarian Party nation wide!

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

They have not progressed since this incident

[-] Zier@fedia.io 55 points 3 days ago

Libertarians are just another sect of the GOP. They are the same party.

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

Libertarians are even dumber than Republicans. Which is saying something.

[-] b161 9 points 3 days ago

Libertarians are just Nazis who want to be able use cryptocurrency for weed and pedophilia.

[-] fern@lemmy.autism.place 5 points 3 days ago

Let's be real, weed is their excuse but they all want coke and opiates.

Libertarians are repubs without the religion and/smoke weed

[-] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Importantly, they split the vote though.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 57 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Libertarians are truly the most oppressed minority.

NH Libertarians describing themselves

Yall chucklefucks do know that that saying is meant to be used derisively, right? Fuck, even African/Native American trans folks don't genuinely refer to themselves as "the most oppressed minority" and you fucks certainly aren't more oppressed than them.

Also, just for anyone who isn't aware the NH Libertarians are famously batshit insane beyond MAGA or regular Libertarians.

[-] just_ducky_in_NH@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

They are, indeed. It’s just embarrassing to the state.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago

If things ever get truly awful just drive west and offer to help with tree tapping!

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

MEEE VEEECTEEEM

[-] whereisk@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

People that want to be able to yell “fire” in packed theatres without consequences and own nuclear weapons at home are truly the most oppressed ideology.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

I cannot imagine a situation in which Kamala Harris is assassinated that doesn’t end in either president walz or a coup.

Assassination is politically unpopular even against unpopular candidates, and Walz seems extremely popular.

[-] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 34 points 4 days ago

This shit has to stop. 🤬

[-] Hydra_Fk@reddthat.com 26 points 4 days ago

Careful she has a red light saber! Pretty sure she is a sith?

[-] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 14 points 4 days ago

Thank goodness - I thought maybe I was the only one who saw that!

[-] Hydra_Fk@reddthat.com 13 points 4 days ago

Just two nerds alone on the Internet.

[-] Substance_P@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago
[-] Albbi@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 days ago
[-] Cort@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Any of you other dorks think she's holding it at a dooku-like angle?

[-] Zier@fedia.io 2 points 3 days ago

She isn't actually holding anything. All those lights are light sabers that she is levitating behind her, with her mind!!!

[-] JohnOliver@feddit.dk 15 points 3 days ago

This is how civil wars start...

[-] APassenger@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

I think that's been the Russian plan. Break cohesion and let us flounder. Murdock, whether he fully knows it or not, is useful to that end.

[-] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

honestly im kinda surprised we didn't get a lot of violence when trump lost in 2020

edit: I meant a full civil war

[-] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

From memory and a couple quick Google searches

  • January 6th, including both the violence at the national Capitol and related, often violent protests outside verious state capitols
  • Death threats to election count and poll workers
  • Republican legislator invites armed men into the Oregon State Capitol during a protest
  • Armed protestors rally around the tallying center in Detroit while the count was ongoing
  • Brawl with counterprotestors at the "million Maga march"
  • Violent "Stop the steal" protests in Sacramento

I wouldn't say there was just a little violence after the 2020 loss

[-] shiroininja@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

they've been off their rocker for a while

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 10 points 4 days ago

Wait til you hear what ancaps are saying.

[-] Embargo@lemm.ee 9 points 4 days ago

I have a feeling that Oliver is not going to be elected as the party president... considering the whole being a insert homophobic slur here and all.

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 6 points 4 days ago

lol. Not at all controlled by Russia

The Independent - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Independent:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/new-hampshire-libertarian-party-harris-assassination-b2613763.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

OK, now I'm thinking the LPNH is a troll, because their response to the party leader is funny as hell.

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
453 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18894 readers
2719 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS