182
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 131 points 1 week ago

"Guys... what if our racist, sexist bully acts like a racist, sexist bully?"

[-] comador@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

When a mange riddled deranged old wolf comes out of sheep's clothing... News as 11.

[-] slaveOne@reddthat.com 7 points 1 week ago

The crazy part is that he has never worn sheep's clothing.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 66 points 1 week ago

So... They gonna send someone else or what?

[-] HK65@sopuli.xyz 51 points 1 week ago

I mean, they are sending a convicted felon against a former prosecutor.

They are not sending their best people, as many people say.

[-] RustyShackleford@literature.cafe 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

My thoughts exactly, they might as well put a sofa and JD Vance on the Republican side and send thoughts and prayers.

[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Actually, I'm willing to believe he IS their best people.

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

It’s totally weird.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I'm not sure they are not sending their best. When looking at people like Ron de Santis or Mike Johnson, I actually like the idea of them sending an imbecile into the race instead of a crazy but potentially capable candidate.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Capable of what? DeSantis showed during the primary that he was incapable of getting the voters on his side, and Mike Johnson couldn't even get the representatives from his own party to vote for him. Trump is the best they've got.

[-] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago

I hope he completely loses his temper and lashes out, making a complete ass of himself. Kamala is tougher than him and can handle it.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

Remember, everybody thought the last debate was going to be a cakewalk for Biden. All he had to do was show up and not look like a sundowning dementia patient. And look how that turned out.

Harris may be able to "handle it" in that he's not going to get her all worked up where she'll break down and cry or something. But will she be able to hold her own on the debate floor? She is untested in that realm and her rally speeches show that she's still not the most confident public speaker, and I could see a situation where Trump just doesn't allow her to get a word in edgewise. Even if he says nothing but his usual incoherent word salads, if he can essentially bully her into silence by just throwing her off with his usual interruptions, firehoses of lies, and shouting down her responses, it could bolster his strongman persona, play to his mysoginist base by "putting her in her place", and give some independent voters the impression that she can't keep up.

Like I said, Harris hasn't been tested. Arguing in a courtroom is one thing when there's a judge who can keep the opposition in check and has the ability to enforce it. It's different when it's moderators who are toothless and can't or won't do anything about Trump who doesn't give a shit about the rules at all. And her continuing uneasiness when she gives rally speeches in front of friendly crowds makes me wonder how she'll handle someone who's game plan is literally to make her look like she belongs back in the kitchen, barefoot and pregnant.

Harris' game plan right from the beginning is that he goes to the debate and just lashes out. That's why she wanted the open mics. But like I said before, Biden got the debate he wanted on his terms and it ended up ending his campaign. Hopefully Harris isn't making the same mistake.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

What's even worse, I worry that Harris may be getting coached to try to thread the needle between getting words in edgewise and not opening herself up to accusations of sounding "shrill," which is probably literally impossible.

Personally, I think her best bet is to give zero shits about being called "shrill" or "nasty," address Trump with every bit as much of the insulting and contemptuous attitude as he tries to use on her while also calling out his bullshit directly and expressing coherent policy positions, and then -- crucially -- respond to anyone who calls her "shrill" afterwards by derisively laughing and mocking weak crybaby Trump for whining that he can't handle her.

Even then, it will be an incredible challenge for her to be perceived as the winner, no matter how much sh wipes the floor with him in any objective sense.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Hopefully he blows a vein or two

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 4 points 1 week ago

A sound bite of him soiling himself on mic would be fun.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 week ago

I’d love it if he got so raged out that he had a stroke on live tv.

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

Mr. Trump plainly believes that Ms. Harris is unintelligent, advisers and allies say.

Coming from the guy that passed an Alzheimer’s test by knowing how to read a fucking clock. Trump is borderline retarded.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Well, let him run head-first into this trap of his own making. Let the nation decide when Harris can address all given issues with ease and coherent sentences while Trump produces random gibberish.

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 24 points 1 week ago

Saddest thing is nobody is going to watch this who hasn't already decided.

The people who voted for him in the last two elections, who would gladly lick the diaper leakage dribbling down his leg off his lifted loafers, will not watch this. They will watch the clips of Fox News sycophants highlighting the two or three gotcha lines and declare him the victor, regardless of his performance.

People on the fence will tune it out, as they have everything else, because they are absolute fucking morons who don't give a shit about anything outside their own sight line.

Harris supporters will confirm that she is a competent orator and debater who won against a gibbering human suitcase full of soiled laundry, and nothing will change.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

nobody is going to watch this who hasn’t already decided

Exactly. Hillary cleaned his clock in the debates and lost. Professor Lictman has documented many debates where the election winner lost. Debates mean nothing. That said, there are other much more reliable factors and Professor Lictman has used them to predicted that Kamala Harris will win this election.

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Thing is, Lictman predicted 2000 correctly but couldn't take into account supreme court fuckery. I'm less worried about winning than I am the fuckery.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

Being a trump advisor sounds like the most stressful and unfulfilling job imaginable. They should probably quit.

[-] ohellidk@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

If they don't get fired first!

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

I would just hide away all the time so he doesn't ever think of me enough to fire me.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They're falling over themselves to suck his dick. None of those people is in any way compelled to do what they're doing. None of them deserves the slightest bit of pity.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yes, but let me dream that someday enough competent people quit that his entire political apparatus simply crumbles.

[-] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

They certainly don't get paid ~~enough for for this shit~~

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Misogynist toadies gotta eat y'know.

[-] Today@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

We will probably see some good ads the day before the debate to get him riled up.

Harris should wheel a loveseat out onto the stage, and when asked about it, say “oh, I was just trying to help my opponent’s running mate feel more relaxed and comfortable”

Like, holy fuck, can you imagine how hilarious it would be if she just went full troll and started needling him with oblique, subtle jabs? Not saying it’s a good idea considering how dumb our median voter is. But it would be quite funny.

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

I have no intention of watching this. I am going to watch the Walz/ Vance debate. That will be entertaining.

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 4 points 1 week ago

I'm not at all sure he can play "tough". It's a lot easier to do when not actually facing the opponent. I predict that he'll attempt to make a joke of it all and complain about something irrelevant. Unless of course he's all drugged up. Then nobody can predict how fucking weird he's going to be.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I think they just mean he's going to be shouting and borderline, if not outright, sexist and racist.

Raw Story - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Raw Story:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.rawstory.com/trump-debate-bully/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[-] Volkditty@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

As opposed to what?

[-] Marleyinoc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

They spelled mentally incompetent bullshitter wrong.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Debates since 2016 (hell, 2000) have been anything but. They are tragicomic farces of inane television “news” production and political spectacle.

It’s not possible to have anything good come from them, but if nothing bad comes from them, then, well - go do, I guess.

I’ll be under the couch with my eyes closed and hands over my ears.

this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
182 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18852 readers
3782 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS