223
submitted 1 month ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft landed in a New Mexico desert late on Friday, months after its original departure date and without the two astronauts it carried when it launched in early June.

Starliner returned to Earth seemingly without a hitch, a Nasa live stream showed, nailing the critical final phase of its mission.

The spacecraft re-entered Earth’s atmosphere around 11pm ET at orbital speeds of roughly 27,400km/h (17,025mph). About 45 minutes later, it deployed a series of parachutes to slow its descent and inflated a set of airbags moments before touching down at the White Sands Space Harbor, an arid desert in New Mexico.

top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] superkret@feddit.org 86 points 1 month ago

Still was the right decision not to chance it.
But I bet the astronauts wish they'd been on it now.

[-] Thorry84@feddit.nl 40 points 1 month ago

Someone who's worked their entire life to not only become trained as an astronaut, but actually go on a space mission. What do you think they prefer? Going home today or staying another few months on an actual space station?

[-] superkret@feddit.org 32 points 1 month ago

I think they'd prefer going home. The mission they came up for is long done, they may have important events in their life or their family's lives scheduled for after the planned return, and staying up for months increases the chances of long term damage to their bodies.

I imagine they're pretty bored by now.

[-] MartianSands@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 month ago

They certainly won't be bored. Astronauts time on the ISS is a precious resource, and work will have been found for them even if they weren't expected to be there

[-] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

I think I read somewhere, but I'd have to go track it down, that the ISS was catching up on a whole lot of back-logged experiments with their unexpected addition to the team.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

I keep saying the same thing and get a bunch of people replying things like, "how do you know they want to see their kids?"

[-] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

To be fair, I've met some absent parents that genuinely don't care if they see their kids again, and unfortnately it is possible for someone like that to be capable of being an astronaut.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Sure, but I think that's a different argument from "they won't take seeing their kids again over months in space when it was supposed to be an eight-day mission because they're in space."

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah there’s a thanksgiving and a Christmas coming up that they’ll miss.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

You would think that, but that's probably not the case. This is what they train for, this is what they want to do. As a rule, astronauts don't tend to get bored of space, that's why they're astronauts.

[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 16 points 1 month ago

0 gravity and living in an enclosed space take a huge toll on one physical and mental being, obviously they wanna go home today, but i bet they also wanna go home in one piece

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

That makes me wonder. What happens if an astronaut just...refuses to come back? They're up on the station and their mission is at its end. They broadcast to NASA. "Actually, I've decided not to come back. I live here now." How would NASA handle that situation?

[-] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

“Actually, I’ve decided not to come back. I live here now.”

Ed Baldwin, is that you?

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

and that could have potentially been what caused to crash and burn or burn and crash. choices choices.

anyhow... I'm thinking they want to be home right now, but maybe not riding on a boeing.

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 67 points 1 month ago

Boeing killed John Barnett

[-] lemmeout@lemm.ee 32 points 1 month ago

I like the part where they waited until after markets closing to take a chance. Also note how NASA announced that astronauts were staying after markets closed.

[-] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago
[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Meet: The Interrobang. ‽ Combination of two types of punctuation that indicates both at once.

[-] EarthBoundMisfit@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

Right choice, play it safe. Glad it landed safely, competition in space is a good thing. Better than a monopoly.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Amazing. Given Boeings recent track record, I didn't expect it to do that.

[-] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 month ago

People are (rightfully) raking Starliner and Boeing for the shitshow that has been this project so far. But the positive to take from this flight, even landing without the crew, is the fact that the capsule itself performed fine. It was the service module that was being screwy. The actual "capsule" part in "capsule" seems to have had it's issues ironed out. Just fix the shitty service module.

[-] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Fucking piece of shit Boeing. Cant believe they would land a god damn spacecraft safely back on Earth. We need to gut them and give all our money to Elon. /s

[-] vladmech@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago
[-] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

You know the Eloners were praying for it to explode.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

You do know that "let's get private corporations out of spaceflight entirely" might be something some people would like, yes?

[-] HK65@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 month ago

I would be fine with "at least don't let them self-regulate", same with aerospace.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Private companies have always been a big part of space flight, except it used to be only large defense contractors (Aka, Boeing, Raytheon, lockheed, etc). Honestly the situation is better now than it has ever been. But we'll never get all private companies out of space flight, NASA can't do it all themselves.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

China does it all themselves. Russia does it all themselves. India does it all themselves. etc.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

And they're doing a real bang up job of it... Dropping tanks of Nitrogen Tetroxide and hydrazine to explode near towns. Really killing it.

And you should know, China is not doing it themselves, there are about a dozen launch companies and aerospace manufacturers making rockets in China.

The Long March 2C that carelessly drops its booster all over the place (a poorly designed rocket) is government made, but they aren't all that way.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I didn't realize all of those countries were China. We can also add in Japan. Which I guess is also China?

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

How is the situation better than it ever has been...?

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Well, we have multiple launch vehicles, we have multiple crew capsules, multiple cargo vehicles, and just about all of them are cheaper than our previous options. The crew capsules we're using now are all several orders of magnitude safer than the space shuttle (even the Starliner in it's current state is an order of magnitude safer than the shuttle). And now we have options that don't require us to negotiate with Russia to use them.

[-] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Tons of them on r/space. They and the people who have become Boeing experts since February.

[-] Ejh3k@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Alex baumgardner jumped from the balloon from basically space, why haven't they figured out a way to do it from low orbit yet?

Because he wasn't moving very fast... To be in orbit you need to be traveling around the earth extremely quickly. The problem is slowing down, not the altitude.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And the ionosphere is the dangerous part. Bellow that, drag slows you down before you burn.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Because he jumped while in the stratosphere (middle level of 3-level atmosphere surrounding the earth). Therefore he didn't have to manage the friction and heat that space shuttles have to endure when they enter the uppermost mesosphere, then stratosphere, then troposphere.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratosphere

[-] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago
this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
223 points (100.0% liked)

News

23305 readers
3212 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS