1115
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 311 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Techbros really went full police state just to deliver ads I wouldn't click on straight into my adblocker

[-] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 151 points 3 months ago

You'd be surprised how many people raw dog the internet.

[-] smeenz@lemmy.nz 67 points 3 months ago

It's terrifying

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I have a friend that pays Google a YouTube tax every month... He tells me he wants to support the creators.

I'm just kind of sad for him... I tried to explain direct donations were a million times more effective, but he clearly just doesn't want to learn how to use an adblocker.

This guy is like 30 years old.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 122 points 3 months ago

Recent versions of Android make it much more difficult for a background app to access the microphone. There will be a notification if any background app is using the mic or camera.

[-] ChillPill@lemmy.world 130 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Google's "Now playing" feature constantly listens to what's going on in the background to show you what songs are playing. They claim this is done with a local database of song "fingerprints". The feature does not show the microphone indicator because: "...Now Playing is protected by Android's Private Compute Core..."

I'm not saying that other, non-google, app do this to my knowledge; but the fact that this is a thing is honestly a bit scary.

Edit: screenshot of the "Now Playing" feature

1000009252

[-] Pichu0102@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago

For what it's worth, I did just test it with airplane mode and it still correctly identified the song playing. So at the very least, it's not lying about using a local database to identify songs, at least when it is offline.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Magister@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

Yup, the green dot top right

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 107 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

"Meta does not use your phone's microphone for ads and we've been public about this for years," the statement read.

Meanwhile:

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 172 points 3 months ago

Not defending Facebook, but if you record a video with sound, then the FB app has to have permission to record your audio.

That said, delete Facebook. Fuck Zuck.

[-] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 28 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

if you record a video with sound, then the FB app has to have permission to record your audio.

I can't tell if you're trying to explain how it currently works (which I know very well, thanks) or asserting that the current behavior is necessary in order to record with sound.

It really doesn't have to be as it is. The OS can provide a record-video API, complete with a user-controlled kill switch and an activity indicator, and the app can call it. The app doesn't need direct access to the microphone to allow the user to create a file with sound.

Edit to clarify: I'm not saying that the "permission" doesn't work as advertised. I'm saying that recording an audio file doesn't have to require a permission system as coarse and disempowering to users as it is today. I guess the people clicking the downvote button misunderstood.

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 43 points 3 months ago

Pretty sure that qualifies for that permission.

But the whole point of doing so is to use it in the app, and you for sure can't do that without the permission.

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I think this is more a teleological argument he is making and I agree. We've become numb to these permission warnings. Oh this app needs access to my camera because I need to take a photo of something once at registration. Why can't it link to my default trusted photo app and that app can send a one time transfer to it? I hardly question these permissions anymore since many apps need permissions for rare one off functions. The only thing I deny every single time is my contact list.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 months ago

teleological

I will thank you

about a million words from now

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Sanguine@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

I downvoted because of the snark in first paragraph.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] patrick@lemmy.jackson.dev 37 points 3 months ago

That is not the same thing as listening in the background.

[-] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Nobody said it was the same thing as listening in the background. It's still relevant and important.

I trust that most adults understand the implications of an exploitable permission and a strong incentive to abuse it, as well as the track record of corporate denials.

[-] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

Using the permission to record audio triggers an on-screen indicator that the mic is recording. Someone would probably notice it on 24/7 recording. Someone would have also by now found the constant stream of network traffic to send the audio to be analyzed, because they also aren't doing that on-device.

[-] Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

Meta said it does not, but what about 3rd parties…

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 3 months ago

"Meta does not use your phone's microphone for ads and we've been public about this for years," the statement read. "We are reaching out to CMG to get them to clarify that their program is not based on Meta data."

Ah, yes. The tried and true defense of "we've denied it for years and continue to deny it" must be credible coming from a source as trustworthy as Facebook. I hear they're planning on holding a press conference to pinky swear they're not listening to the microphone they demand access to in order to show you ads that make them money.

[-] scytale@lemm.ee 45 points 3 months ago

FWIW, this was debunked when CMG originally made the claim. It was a marketing guy overselling their product and they had to correct their statement. They use the same info data brokers collect, and phones actively listening to you is not true.

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 months ago

Even what they said could be true without applying to phones. They said "smart devices" a lot. They never said "smart phone".

There are a lot of IoT devices, some of which have microphones, a lot less secure than either iPhone or Android.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 54 points 3 months ago

Dildos, lots of dildos! I'm just gonna repeat that while I'm driving to see if I start getting Google ads for dildos.

[-] simonced@lemmy.one 31 points 3 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 25 points 3 months ago

If that works, you should try it with a product that you aren't interested in too and compare the results.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 52 points 3 months ago

They really need to name-and-shame beyond "Facebook Partner" considering we're talking about fucking Cox Media Group.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 46 points 3 months ago

It remains funny to me that futurism.com became mostly about covering the dystopia we live in.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 44 points 3 months ago

I remember reading some time ago that "the idea (of phones listening to everything you say to serve ads) makes no economic sense, because it'd be too expensive to run"

Looks like it actually isn't "too expensive" to run in the end.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] endofline@lemmy.ca 43 points 3 months ago

Most of the non tech people reaction

[-] Blackdoomax@sh.itjust.works 37 points 3 months ago

But before that, when it was not acknowledged by social media, it was more like ' you're paranoid. And you think you're that important that they listen to you? Common, get back to reality '

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago

I am so numb to outrage that this just seems... Meh. What happened to me.

[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

It's the world we live in. It's very much intentionally designed to make you complacent.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Subverb@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

These companies absolutely do use your microphone to listen.

My wife and I have tested this and you can too.

Have a conversation near your phones about purchasing something offbeat. We used a kitchen garbage disposal in our test. Talk about them for a few minutes, about needing to buy one, different brands, etc.

Almost immediately you'll be served garbage disposal adds.

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago

What's the last "bombshell scandal that would ruin a company" that actually ruined a company?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] patrick@lemmy.jackson.dev 37 points 3 months ago

I highly doubt that they actually managed to do this, at least any time recently.

As another commenter noted, Android alerts you when an app is accessing the microphone in the background, and it would also absolutely destroy the phones battery life more than the FB app currently does. The only way that we have the "Hey Google/Siri" command prompts active all the time is with custom hardware not available to the apps, and certainly not without Android knowing about it.

Maybe they actively listen while the app is open, but even then I think recent Android/iOS would let you know about that.

[-] ChillPill@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

Google's "Now playing" feature constantly listens to what's going on in the background to show you what songs are playing. They claim this is done with a local database of song "fingerprints". The feature does not show the microphone indicator because: "...Now Playing is protected by Android's Private Compute Core..."

I'm not saying that other, non-google, app do this to my knowledge; but the fact that this is a thing is honestly a bit scary.

[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago

This is why I don't like the push of everything needing an app. I sure do wish people in congress cared about this type of privacy issues the way they did Tiktok.

[-] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

There were whole threads of people saying this stuff doesn't happen. They would say it just didn't make sense that companies would do this, it's not worth it to them. That all the ads I was seeing at convenient times were just a coincidence.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] gcheliotis@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

A market agency claiming they do something of the sort isn’t proof that conversations are being monitored en masse. Security researchers can and probably have tested for this and found no clear, verifiable evidence, otherwise we would have known. Also, this stuff can be blocked at the OS level and I find it hard to imagine (esp. without solid proof) that Google or Apple would jeopardize their reputations to this extent by enabling such unauthorized listening in on users’ conversations.

Of course it’s good to keep watching this space but we shouldn’t jump to conclusions.

load more comments (27 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
1115 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

60042 readers
2261 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS