785
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 219 points 10 months ago

Recycling is mostly a scam. Most recycled trash is just dumped on third world countries.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 111 points 10 months ago

Metal and paper recycling is super useful.

But yes, plastic recycling is a massive lie that probably does quite a bit more harm/waste than it would be just to throw it in the landfill

[-] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 39 points 10 months ago

Metal and glass are recycleable. And if they do get into the environment, they are really just purified rocks and will gradually become sand in the weather. (Not that it’s great to have soda cans and broken glass in the sea, but to some extent it’s not as bad as microplastics).

Paper is recycleable.

Paper, wood, and other plant products (e.g. cotton) are biodegradable and come from plants that can be farmed.

In terms of sustainability it’s something like:

  1. Plant products
  2. Metal and glass
  3. Plastics

But also even more important than that, it’s far better to reuse something many times than to use single use products, regardless of the material they are made of.

[-] nyankas@lemmy.ml 80 points 10 months ago

This is wrong, please stop spreading this misinformation.

It probably differs from country to country, but in Germany, for example, between 38-48% of plastic is recycled (source). Sure, that‘s far from all of it, but still far, far better than nothing. Falsely claiming that recycling is mostly a scam and, by that, implying that it doesn‘t make sense to try to recycle you trash, is a horrible idea and only makes the situation worse.

[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 65 points 10 months ago

Germany is the best at recycling plastics in the world, yet they recycle less than half of all plastics... I won't call that misinformation based on this. Also please don't twist our words, we aren't saying recycling is a scam in general, just plastic recycling is a scam,

When we call plastic recycling a scam, we are advocating for not using plastics. Reduce, reuse, recycle, remember that.

[-] nyankas@lemmy.ml 27 points 10 months ago

Firstly, I‘m not twisting words, there is no mention of „plastic“ in the post I was replying to, just plain „recycling“.

Secondly, I’m sorry, but I really don‘t understand how a non-perfect rate makes plastic recycling a scam. Recycling is hard. There‘s no magic recycling machine, which just converts 100% of plastic waste to newly usable material. There are so many reasons for a less than perfect recycling rate (non-separated trash, contamination, badly designed packaging, technical limitations when sorting etc.pp.), that I find it just very strange and unhelpful to call it a scam without substantial support for that claim.

Sure, not using plastic would be best, but that‘s just more idealistic than realistic. I think that plastic is such an integral part of our lives right now, that it‘s not going to go away anytime soon. And that makes recycling, for now, an important step to reduce the total amount of plastic we use.

[-] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 10 months ago

In addition to recycling quota OP also claimed that supposedly recycled trash is trash dumped on poor countries while it's actually a trash management issue. The first comment is just pure populistic misinformation as you said.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Also please don’t twist our words, we aren’t saying recycling is a scam in general, just plastic recycling is a scam,

Thread OP didn't specify that

[-] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 9 points 10 months ago

The other person called plastic recycling a massive lie that causes more harm than good. That is misinformation plain and simple.

[-] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 8 points 10 months ago

Since the lie that plastic can be recycled resulted in a massive increase in the amount of plastic being used over actually recyclable materials like glass and aluminum, it does, in fact, do more harm than good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 10 months ago

It's pretty true in the United States at least.

[-] DampSquid@feddit.uk 7 points 10 months ago

And Australia.

[-] nyankas@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago

I‘m not even sure about that. According to EPA, the rate of recycling seems to be improving overall, paper and paperboard are recycled at 68.2% (2018), which is honestly a great rate. Sure, there‘s always going to be landfilling, be it because of the waste‘s quality, capacity issues, or, yes, even a bad actor. But generalizing recycling as a scam only leads people to think that it doesn‘t matter if you try to recycle or not. And that leads to 76% of recyclables never even getting the chance of being recycled.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Hegar@fedia.io 21 points 10 months ago

Are you sure that's still the case? I know china stopped accepting it ages ago - that's why most recycling just goes to domestic landfill now.

[-] Orbituary@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

It's still the case. India was a destination, too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Basic economics dictates that recycling plastic isn't profitable otherwise industry would be doing it, itself. –That doesn't make it a scam. It's more like bad marketing.

Some of it will be truly recycled like with hdpe. Some will be used more conscientiously by being sent for plasma gasification. Lots of it will still get sent to the landfill, but that's better then sending all of it. Something rarely mentioned is that most plastics become less stable each time they're melted down, making them increasingly difficult to recycle.

It's believed that ~75% of all Aluminium that has ever been produced is still in use because it's economically more viable to recycle old aluminum than refine new. Alumium refinement is a highly energy intensive process.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Resonosity@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Single stream recycling is a scam. Multi stream is much better. I recycle my paper and metals separately from glass and plastics for this reason. Wish there was an easy way to recycle glass too, but the collection networks aren't as widespread as the other two.

[-] pickleprattle@midwest.social 125 points 10 months ago

The cost to dispose or recycle should be paid by the companies that produce the product. Products would waste less material and recycling would be profitable for recycling companies doing a public service.

Yes, companies will want to make customers eat that cost. I don't know if there is a legislative solution for that or what.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 37 points 10 months ago

People are like "but the plastic bottle is free and easy", and I'm like that's because all those costs are paid for later, by everyone. It's really frustrating but common short sightedness.

No one should be allowed to product something without a plan for disposing of it safely and without environmental cost. I'm willing to suffer the inconvenience of carrying a reusable bag if it means less environmental destruction.

[-] TheRealLinga@sh.itjust.works 37 points 10 months ago

IIRC, that's actually how it was set up to begin with, way back when we used glass bottles for Coke. Big companies manipulated us consumers into thinking we were being lazy for not taking care of recycling ourselves and that's how we got to this mess today.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 16 points 10 months ago

If the companies try and make the consumer eat the cost, then the companies who sell their products in cardboard packaging instead of plastic will be able to sell it for cheaper and potentially steal business from the others. There are plenty of products sold in plastic which do not need to be.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

You can literally just put a tax on new plastic bottles vs recycled plastic bottles and the issue solves itself, the issue with recycling is that it's not economically viable.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 122 points 10 months ago

I fully support throwing AirTags, and really all Apple products, directly in the trash.

[-] w2tpmf@sh.itjust.works 49 points 10 months ago

The iSheep are down voting you. 😆

Too in love with their gadgets to take a joke.

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Jokes are funny though. This is just a bad attempt to get some fake Internet points.

Not a single Apple product in my house either.

[-] Quik@infosec.pub 10 points 10 months ago

I’m actually not too sure about that. I am currently using an older iPhone (and I really dislike Apple, it’s just that the stupid device just does not stop working) and from an environmental perspective, throwing that away would surely be worse than continuing to use it, right?

[-] IoSapsai@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago

Exactly the reason I got a second hand iPhone coming from Android. All my androids would suddenly get a stroke after three years at best. My old boss would hold a funeral for his 10 year old iPhone which worked great but shattered after a bad drop.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cybervseas@lemmy.world 84 points 10 months ago

Update: AG Ken Paxton sues Texas resident for exposing lack of actual recycling at a Houston Center.

[-] deltreed@lemmy.world 51 points 10 months ago

Plastic companies created the 'recycling' efforts to get the public to believe their use of plastics wasn't as bad as it is. In reality, it is horrible for the environment.

[-] errer@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago

I read the article, this is different from the other airtag exposes done on other recycling agencies: the plastic is still sitting on their property with a promise to be recycled later. They may break that promise at some point, but they haven’t yet, so the jury is still out IMO. Unlike other experiments like this where they find the airtags end up in a trash landfill or an incinerator.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 7 points 10 months ago

Yeah, usually these companies just end up storing it all in a warehouse or a field until they go bankrupt, then the people behind that company start another company doing the same. And yeah, they promise they're working on technology to do the actual future recycling, but it never pans out.

[-] LengAwaits@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago

We recommend four widely applicable high-impact (i.e. low emissions) actions with the potential to contribute to systemic change and substantially reduce annual personal emissions: having one fewer child (an average for developed countries of 58.6 tonnes CO2-equivalent (tCO2e) emission reductions per year), living car-free (2.4 tCO2e saved per year), avoiding airplane travel (1.6 tCO2e saved per roundtrip transatlantic flight) and eating a plant-based diet (0.8 tCO2e saved per year). These actions have much greater potential to reduce emissions than commonly promoted strategies like comprehensive recycling (four times less effective than a plant-based diet) or changing household lightbulbs (eight times less).

^https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7541/pdf^

[-] KyuubiNoKitsune 21 points 10 months ago

I don't see any of those things reducing microplastics in the environment nor plastic being dumped in the rivers and ocean. The motivation behind recycling has very little to do with climate change.

[-] HereIAm@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Am I wrong I thinking that the CO2 emission from plastics is missing the point a bit. The issue in my mind is that the plastics remain in nature for a very long time with unknown health risks to us and the ecosystem.

When comparing a plastic bag vs a paper bag for shopping I hear the argument that making the paper bag has a lot more co2 emissions tied to it. But if I throw it in the bin it will be mulch before the end of the month.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 10 months ago

AirTag in the trash. Quite fitting...

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago
[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

The recycle bin? You mean the other landfill bin, right?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 16 points 10 months ago

Venture capital strikes again.

[-] Smk@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 months ago

Plastic has multiple type that each require a different process for recycling.

Having a bunch of plastic all mixed up together needs people to manually separate them.

It's a joke.

[-] portuga@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

So that’s what those things are worth for

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
785 points (100.0% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

13062 readers
374 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS