58
submitted 2 months ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

Artificial intelligence researchers said Friday they have deleted more than 2,000 web links to suspected child sexual abuse imagery from a dataset used to train popular AI image-generator tools.

The LAION research dataset is a huge index of online images and captions that’s been a source for leading AI image-makers such as Stable Diffusion and Midjourney.

But a report last year by the Stanford Internet Observatory found it contained links to sexually explicit images of children, contributing to the ease with which some AI tools have been able to produce photorealistic deepfakes that depict children.

That December report led LAION, which stands for the nonprofit Large-scale Artificial Intelligence Open Network, to immediately remove its dataset. Eight months later, LAION said in a blog post that it worked with the Stanford University watchdog group and anti-abuse organizations in Canada and the United Kingdom to fix the problem and release a cleaned-up dataset for future AI research.

Stanford researcher David Thiel, author of the December report, commended LAION for significant improvements but said the next step is to withdraw from distribution the “tainted models” that are still able to produce child abuse imagery.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

I'm glad they removed them, but it's kind of closing the barn doors after the horses have bolted at this point.

[-] Iapar@feddit.org 27 points 2 months ago

Complete failure of everyone involved that it was in there in the first place.

[-] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

These datasets have billions of images in them (The Laion database have 5 billion images!). There is no way a human can go through them to check for bad content.

[-] Iapar@feddit.org 8 points 2 months ago

Then don't just use it? Or use a program? There a multiple ways to not do something stupid and none of them occurred to them because it is more important to them to be at the top of the shitpile.

[-] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

The dataset sizes needed for machine learning rule out any kind of human verification. It's just not possible to manually check billions of images.

[-] Iapar@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago

Oh, that makes it okay then.

[-] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

How would you check 5 billion images?

[-] Iapar@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago

Mu.

I wouldn't use a amount of images I couldn't check. I wouldn't use images from unchecked sources. I wouldn't make money from sexual exploited children.

And I think people that don't see the most obvious solution to that are fucked in the head.

[-] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

That won't work. Models of this kind need billions of images or they are trash.

[-] vrek@programming.dev 11 points 2 months ago

Great they removed them.... Did they report the images to the authorities?

[-] RecallMadness@lemmy.nz 4 points 2 months ago

If 2000 out of 5,000,000,000 images can be found, why couldn’t they be found before the dataset was published.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

That's a question to be pondered for the ages.

/s

this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
58 points (100.0% liked)

News

23293 readers
2927 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS