485
Physics rule (slrpnk.net)
submitted 1 year ago by Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to c/196
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They're traveling away from their origin at constant velocities, so they're traveling relative to each other at constant velocities as well.

The magnitude of the resulting vector (i.e., speed) can be calculated trivially since their movement is perpendicular on a plane, as the root of sum of squares, which many could recognize as the Pythagorean theorem:

√((5 ft/s)² + (1 ft/s)²) = √26 ft/s ≈ 5.1 ft/s

You can verify this by finding that their average speed apart is the same at all times (for all t > 0):

Vavg = √((t * 5 ft/s)² + (t * 1 ft/s)²) / t = √(t² * ((5 ft/s)² + (1 ft/s)²)) / t = √26 ft/s

[-] key@lemmy.keychat.org 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Don't forget to calculate the location where everything about them began and then include the curvature of Earth considering the latitude of said location into your speed calculation.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

No, they're spherical children in a vacuum.

[-] answersplease77@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

for approximation we can assume that the boy is a point mass and the girl is a lie

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Oh, so we have to calculate the gravitational attraction pulling them back. Fucking hell

[-] Hamartia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Augustus! Save some room for later.

[-] Randelung@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_geometry

I couldn't find 'potatoy geometry' for a better approximation of earth.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You'll note that I already assumed that they were on a plane, not the surface of a sphere.

[-] Randelung@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'm also noting the stick up your ass. 🙄

If the potato remark and subreddit don't tip you off that I was being flippant, I don't know what will.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

No, the stick would be a one-dimensional line.

[-] De_Narm@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's been a while, but I think it's quite trivial.

After one second, they span a right angled triangle, therefore (using a² + b² = c²) their distance is √(5²+1²) = ~5.1 ft

They move at constant speed, therefore they seperate at 5.1 ft/s. That means at 5s it's just 5.1 × 5 = 25.5 ft for the distance and their speed is still the same.

[-] dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

~~They each move at a constant speed, but the distance between them doesn't increase at a constant pace. See my other comment.~~

Edit: I am dumb, and looked at the wrong number.

[-] De_Narm@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm trying to apply the most simple math possible and it seems to add up.

After one second, their distance is √(5² + 1²) = ~5.1 ft

After two seconds, their distance is √(10² + 2²) = ~10.2 ft

After three seconds, it's √(15² + 3²) = ~15.3 ft

As speed is the rate of change of distance over time, you can see it's a constant 5.1 ft/s. You're free to point out any error, but I don't think you need anything more than Pythagoras' theorem.

The question specifically asks for their seperation speed at 5s to ignore any initial change in their speed as they first need to accelerate, I'd assume.

[-] dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago

Ah sorry, I'm tired and made a mistake. I quickly made a spreadsheet (because keeping track of numbers is hard), and I was looking at the wrong column in the sheet. My bad!

[-] OrnateLuna 8 points 1 year ago

You were tired so you made a spreadsheet to calculate the differential equation quiz from a meme?

[-] dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago

Yes, compared to doing the calculations in my head lol

I work in mysterious ways

[-] booly@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

I don't see why the distance between them isn't growing at a constant speed.

At any given time t seconds after separation, the boy is 5t north, and the girl is 1t east. The distance between them is defined by the square root of ((5t)^2 + (t)^2 ), or about 5.099t.

In other words, the distance between them is simply a function defined as 5.099t, whose first derivative with respect to time is just 5.099.

[-] Bumblefumble@lemm.ee 39 points 1 year ago

Depends on where they met each other. If they for example fell in love during the main event of a trip to the north pole, that would change things a lot.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago

there is no north at the north pole so actually that's the one place it can't be

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 13 points 1 year ago

If you're at the south pole, would every direction count as north?

[-] Bumblefumble@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Sure, but there is a north say 30 ft away from the north pole.

[-] Missmuffet@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

Its pretty convenient that its raining, which means you can ignore the coefficient of friction since the surface is slippery

[-] itsnotits@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It's* pretty convenient that it's* raining

[-] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 32 points 1 year ago

Differential calculus? That looks more like algebra. Their speed is constant.

[-] Teppic@piefed.social 9 points 1 year ago

I agree, it is not calculus, it's trigonometry.

[-] havid_dume@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Each of their speeds is constant, but different, and they're walking in different directions.

[-] luciole@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago

Their distance is the hypotenuse of a triangle with sides 5t and t which will be root((5t)^2^ + t^2^). So the distance at time t of the ex lovers will be root(26) × t. You can basically grasp intuitively that the speed is indeed constant and equals to the root(26)=5.1 ft/sec. Technically you’d use the derivative power rule to drop the t and get the speed.

[-] luciole@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago

Look. Teachers have some unresolved shit as well.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 15 points 1 year ago

It doesn't matter what the actual answer is; to both the boy and the girl it feels like C.

[-] thecheddarcheese 9 points 1 year ago

reminds me of that one song, proof that geometric construction can solve all love affairs or something like that

[-] nao@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago
[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Who hurt the math teacher?

[-] dasgewisseextra@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago
[-] dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The question states "how fast", not "how far", thus you need to give the acceleration at that moment.

At t=0, the boy and girl both haven't moved, so their positions are 0. The distance between them is also 0, as is their acceleration.

The boy's distance in meters is t*1.524, the girl's distance is t*0.3048. The distance between them is sqrt( b^2 * g^2 ). The velocity is the current distance minus the previous distance.

At t=1, b=1.524m, g=0.305, d=sqrt( g^2 * g^2 )=0.465, v=d-d^(t-1)=0.465m/s.

At t=5, b=7.62, g=1.524, d=11.613, and v=4.181m/s.

Edit: fixed markdown

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Velocity is not the difference between distances.

[-] ji17br@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

It’s the difference of distances apart over time. Aka how fast bf is moving away from gf, aka what the question is asking for.

Yes, if you want to be pedantic, velocity a vector with direction, so I guess you’d have to frame the question relative to either the boyfriend or girlfriend, but I don’t think the difference between speed and velocity is part of the question.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Speed is just the magnitude of velocity.

My point is that OC was completely missing the mark by not properly accounting for time.

[-] dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

Hi, I made this in 5 mins because I was bored, but it's late and I'm tired, so could you please explain what I would have to fix in my comment?

[-] ji17br@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

You want to figure out distance per second. One way to do this is calculate distance apart at t=0,1,2…

The difference between each point would be the average speed over that second.

Using sqrt(b^2+g^2):

t0 = 0 t1 = 1.554m
s1 = (1.554m-0m)/1s = 1.554m/s t2 = 3.108m
s2=(3.108m-1.554m)= 1.554m/s

As you continue this you will see they travel at a constant speed apart from each other. The reason this is working is because you need to divide distance by time. Dividing by 1 second won’t change the value of the number after you subtract. If you notice you can do (t2-t0)/2s and also get the same answer.

[-] dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

Ahhh okay, thanks

[-] ji17br@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

My mistake, I didn’t check his math. I thought he was saying if you take distance apart at t(n) and subtract distance apart at t(n-1) you will get distance/sec.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Only if you divide by time. Including units is an essential sanity check.

Also, the rest of the math needs to be correct.

[-] ji17br@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Well that’s my point. The answer is correct in this specific case, because it’s already “built-in” so to speak.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

No, their answer is wrong.

[-] ji17br@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I’m talking about my previous response. I already said their answer is wrong.

this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
485 points (100.0% liked)

196

18274 readers
675 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS