404
It depends (lemy.lol)
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] poszod@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

"LLM did something silly" must be the most boring type of concern bait out there.

[-] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago

No, it's not LLM did something silly, it's google / alpphabet has a defective product which millions of people realy on

[-] Zorsith 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I would generally consider anyone who relies on AI to be an incompetent hack

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Exactly. a young child could figure this out typically

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 year ago

Yeah but who cares about people that are stupid enough to rely on shitty "AI" google products

[-] HK65@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

Then don't look up I guess.

The problem on its broadest is if companies put out shitty products and the line still goes up, then the line going up does not mean the economy is producing what we need efficiently. That means the system is obviously broken. Maybe the system never worked in the first place.

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The line going up has never meant that a company is working in the publics favour. The system has always been broken, the only way to win is to not rely on big companies and their products as much as you possibly can.

Anyone that unironically relies on LLM outputs to guide their decisions is responsible for the outcome themselves.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

People have gotten so mad at me for saying this. Seems like they're finally getting it

[-] Trollception@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 year ago

Strange. This is the result I get from Google.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 43 points 1 year ago

It's the same result the author of the image had before editing it with inspect element for internet points. You can see the source material on the bottom of the image, seems to match with your result.

[-] f314@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Looks like the sources are different: In the top right of the response you can see the fav icons of the sites the AI used to get info. They are ~~apparently the same three pages, but in a different order~~ different pages, and in the OP it says +5 vs +3 in the other screenshot.

So it looks like they might have dropped a couple of bad sources somewhere along the way. But that doesn’t help those who already got bad answers in the meantime..

[-] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Doesn't Google present them in order of usage in the summary?

[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Please explain how someone uses inspect element on iOS in what appears to be the default Safari app.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Mobile Safari supports remote debug/remote inspect element on a Mac.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Yeah I don't think I've been able to reproduce a single one of these types of posts yet. I've gotten a radically different result several times though

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago
[-] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

"Man shows that LLMs don't work the way too many people expect them to."

Called that one. Hey, this technology is like the game telephone we use to play as children, who wants to invest billions????

this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
404 points (100.0% liked)

People Twitter

8288 readers
1810 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS