"LLM did something silly" must be the most boring type of concern bait out there.
No, it's not LLM did something silly, it's google / alpphabet has a defective product which millions of people realy on
I would generally consider anyone who relies on AI to be an incompetent hack
Exactly. a young child could figure this out typically
Yeah but who cares about people that are stupid enough to rely on shitty "AI" google products
Then don't look up I guess.
The problem on its broadest is if companies put out shitty products and the line still goes up, then the line going up does not mean the economy is producing what we need efficiently. That means the system is obviously broken. Maybe the system never worked in the first place.
The line going up has never meant that a company is working in the publics favour. The system has always been broken, the only way to win is to not rely on big companies and their products as much as you possibly can.
Anyone that unironically relies on LLM outputs to guide their decisions is responsible for the outcome themselves.
People have gotten so mad at me for saying this. Seems like they're finally getting it
Strange. This is the result I get from Google.
It's the same result the author of the image had before editing it with inspect element for internet points. You can see the source material on the bottom of the image, seems to match with your result.
Looks like the sources are different: In the top right of the response you can see the fav icons of the sites the AI used to get info. They are ~~apparently the same three pages, but in a different order~~ different pages, and in the OP it says +5 vs +3 in the other screenshot.
So it looks like they might have dropped a couple of bad sources somewhere along the way. But that doesn’t help those who already got bad answers in the meantime..
Doesn't Google present them in order of usage in the summary?
Please explain how someone uses inspect element on iOS in what appears to be the default Safari app.
Mobile Safari supports remote debug/remote inspect element on a Mac.
Yeah I don't think I've been able to reproduce a single one of these types of posts yet. I've gotten a radically different result several times though
"Man shows that LLMs don't work the way too many people expect them to."
Called that one. Hey, this technology is like the game telephone we use to play as children, who wants to invest billions????
People Twitter
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.