226
Simple math rule (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 2 months ago by FGoo@sh.itjust.works to c/196
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ns1@feddit.uk 63 points 2 months ago

All maths papers are like this

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Disciplines in mathematics assume you're familiar with that discipline's shorthand, constants and common forms. Also, you're not expected to read them as you're able to read a book. If it's 100% your niche specialty then maybe you could, but spending and hour or two puzzling out a broad understanding of a paper is absolutely normal, even for math academics.

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 months ago

They start by make sure you're primed to feel stupid if you don't understand it?

[-] ns1@feddit.uk 24 points 2 months ago

It can feel like that, though I'm sure it's (mostly) not deliberate. Also the sudden jump from straightforward to incomprehensible, accompanied by a comment from the author along the lines of "well duh"

[-] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 months ago

Don't forget something like "As my book focuses on explaining concepts to normal people in simple manner, I will only include simple math."

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

Every Wikipedia page on a mathematical concept as well

[-] Oestradiolo 30 points 2 months ago

Gronk has one club.

Gronk brutally smashed the head of his fellow caveman, murdering his tribe, stealing his food, taking his club.

Gronk has two club.

Mahts.

[-] Sasha 25 points 2 months ago

Come on, you can't just leave those dummy indices dangling, at least sum over them with a kronecker delta or the minkowski metric if this is some approximation of curved space.

(2) Appears to have a typo, but it could just be that the sqrt symbol won't extend further, which isn't good either lol

[-] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

Rest of the fucking owl...

[-] yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 months ago

Are we sure this book isn't a shitpost?

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 months ago

This is absolutely taking the piss. "No calculus is required" is obviously not true when there's, what, five integrals on the page?

[-] serendepity@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If this is indeed real, can somebody please point me to the paper/text? That introduction has piqued my curiosity and I wanna read the whole thing, even if the math might be incomprehensible.

[-] itslilith 6 points 2 months ago

The square you root in the second equation should go over the both integrals, but that step is pointless anyways. Just by symmetryzing the integration boundaries it's already a Gaussian integral, which is a standard integral

this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
226 points (100.0% liked)

196

16501 readers
2766 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS