317

DNC night one ratings beat RNC by 21 percent despite late Biden speech (www.independent.co.uk)

submitted 2 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Early data comes as Trump reportedly concerned Kamala Harris nomination speech will outshine his from RNC

The first night of the ongoing Democratic National Convention in Chicago had signficantly better ratings than the opening of the Republican National Convention last month, according to overnight data.

The DNC had 11.4 percent of sampled households watching in 44 major metro areas across seven networks on Monday, compared with the RNC’s 9.4 percent rating, a difference of over 20 percent, according to TV analyst Michael Mulvihill, president of insights and analytics at FOX Sports, FOX Entertainment, and Tubi.

In a statement on X, the analyst warned that the data was just preliminary.

top 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 75 points 2 months ago

Only one person cares about these ratings, and he hates this.

[-] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 16 points 2 months ago

That weird obsession with crowd size....

https://youtube.com/shorts/Cf88zzwxrEU?feature=shared

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Heheh, that little look at his own hands.....

And the cameras scanning the, not one, but two packed arenas, the second one being where Trump's convention had been....

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 44 points 2 months ago

It's so weird that a former "celebrity" would be such a ratings loser. How humiliating that must be, when he has every advantage. Looks. Experience. Bottle of sperm freshly harvested from a couch glove...

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 43 points 2 months ago

Interesting that people still care so much about live viewings of non-sports content in the age of VOD.

But also: lol Trump is gonna lose his shit

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Fun fact: "TV ratings" are polls!

[-] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

“These ratings are fake ratings. The best people are telling me this. And I know it’s true because I’m very intelligent—my uncle, MIT guy, very smart, good genes. This is the Marxist, fascist media trying to take Trump down, just like they did to the late, great Hannibal Lector.

Just yesterday, a TV executive—big, tough guy, never cried before in his life—came up to me and said, with tears running down his face, he said, ‘sir, I’ve never seen ratings as fake as these.’”

— Donald Trump, probably

[-] ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

As I read all these classic lines (and try not to roll my eyes out of my head), I can see them scrolling up a TV screen—some in yellow text—just like those old "Greatest Hitz" CD commercials.

[-] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

79.2% did not tune in

better article would have discussed why both parties are not seeing voter enthusiasm at high percentages and do not think being in bed is the end all reason for the disengagement

[-] Volkditty@lemmy.world 84 points 2 months ago

I'm voting for Harris. I don't need to watch a pep rally to convince me.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Yeah, all she has to do is be a functional human being, and she's already demonstrated that.

Still needs to campaign hard in battleground states for down ballots.

But this isn't useless, the people tuning in to conventions are already voting for that party. But they're the ones knocking on doors, phone banking, and other important volunteer work.

Their engagement is very important, and that's who conventions cater too.

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

egads!!!

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

So am I. But what are we doing to convince others, especially others in battlefront states? Michelle reminded me about that. And honestly it was just refreshing to hear political speech that wasn't making me cringe or retch.

[-] Carvex@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago

I work 10 hour days, 5 days a week to make enough to barely save a small retirement, that maybe some day I'll use before dying. I don't care to see any of these people on TV congratulating themselves on a Tuesday. I will vote Democrat for the forseeable future because of sanity, but my disengagement is hardly measureable.

[-] Triteer@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

That's not how relative percentages work lmao

[-] aniki@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 months ago

Mate I woulnd't tune in if Jesus was giving a speech. Both of these conferences are just hot-air extravaganzas -- absolutely worthless.

[-] almar_quigley@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Who fucking watches live TV? Go home boomer and answer the pollster calling your landline to complain more about how much you hate the dems.

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

It's largely boring and goes for like 15 hours a day for several days in a row. Much of it occurs while people are working, and the big names often go on after half the country is asleep.

What are you even talking about? Do you think people staring at their TV for 45 hours would somehow translate to voter enthusiasm? No one watches live TV. People watch clips or recordings after the fact, just like with literally everything else.

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

I have plenty of voter enthusiasm, I just have better shit to do with my life than watch the DNC or the RNC. I already know what they're gonna blabber about for literal hours in a row and I frankly don't care to listen again.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

What could I possibly gain by watching political party propaganda on TV, especially if I already agree with the message?

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

The Independent - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for The Independent:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/dnc-chicago-biden-ratings-rnc-b2599149.html
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/dnc-live-updates-harris-obama-speech-democrats-b2598844.html
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-rnc-speech-shooting-biden-republican-gop-b2582501.html

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024

317 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers

2693 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News